🚨🚨🚨Thread!

Buckle up.

1/66

It’s been claimed that voting by mail leads to massive corruption and fraud. But what are the facts?
2/

U.S. citizens will vote by mail this year in record numbers. In the face of a global health emergency, election officials across the country from both parties are working heroically to ensure that voting by mail is accurate, accessible, safe & secure.
3/

There's simply no basis for the conspiracy theory that voting by mail causes fraud. None.

@CNN & @washingtonpost fact-checks show this. But many others have examined the issue and arrived at the same conclusion. Still others have provided some key context. Take a look!
4/

Here is @CNN's fact-check, cited by @Twitter:

cnn.com/2020/05/26/pol…
5/

And here is @washingtonpost's fact-check, also cited by @Twitter:

washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/…
14/

U.S. Election Assistance Commission White Paper: Deep Dive on Early, Absentee, and Mail Voting (@EACgov):

eac.gov/documents/2017… Image
17/

All types of voter fraud in U.S. elections are minuscule in comparison to the number of ballots cast, according to elections experts (@BrennanCenter):

brennancenter.org/our-work/analy… Image
18/

@Reuters poll finds that 72% of all U.S. adults, including 65% of Republicans, support a requirement for mail-in ballots to protect voters (@Cmkahn):

reuters.com/article/us-usa… Image
20/

In 2016, roughly 1 in 4 voters cast their votes via mail-in ballot (@voteathome):

docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/ef45f5_81a… Image
21/

"Oregon has mailed out more than 100 million ballots since 2000, with about a dozen cases of proven fraud; a 0.000012 percent rate" (@drvox for @voxdotcom):

vox.com/policy-and-pol… Image
22/

President disbanded his own commission charged with investigating voter fraud in 2018, without producing any systemic evidence of fraud. @miwine & @tackettdc for @nytimes:

nytimes.com/2018/01/03/us/… Image
23/

"Deeply conservative Utah has moved almost entirely to vote-by-mail in recent years" (@aseitzwald & @sahilkapur for @NBCNews):

nbcnews.com/politics/2020-… Image
24/

President requests vote-by-mail ballot for Florida Republican presidential primary (@mannahhorse for @pbpost):

palmbeachpost.com/news/20200311/… Image
25/

Fox News Anchor Chris Wallace: "I've done some deep dive into it, there really is no record of massive fraud or even serious fraud from mail-in voting." "It's being carried out in Republican states, it's being carried out in Democratic states."

26/

From more than a billion votes cast between 2000 and 2012, there were only 491 cases of absentee-voter fraud (@news21 Voting Rights Project):

votingrights.news21.com/article/about/ Image
27/

Parties are virtually equal in percentages of who votes by mail (@cstewartiii for @Caltech):

electionupdates.caltech.edu/2020/03/20/som… Image
30/

GOP state officials warming to vote-by-mail (NE, OH, WV, IA); Iowa Republican SoS Paul Pate: sowing “doubt about the integrity of the process is as dangerous as vote fraud" (@NickRiccardi for @AP):

apnews.com/4cf54df2ab65b4… Image
31/

Mistake, not fraud: "Fraud by individual voters is almost nonexistent; mistakes in a confusing system are the real issue" (@Rutgers_Camden Professor Lorraine C. Minnite):Â

scholars.org/sites/scholars… Image
32/

@BrennanCenter's "The Truth About Voter Fraud" found that even among the small number of reported incidents of 'fraud,' most turn out to be traceable to other causes:

brennancenter.org/sites/default/… Image
35/

@kirstenfrankly (Chief of Staff, UT GOP Lt. Gov. @SpencerJCox): "there is very little evidence of voter fraud within our mail-in system" (@NBCNews):

nbcnews.com/politics/donal… Image
36/

GOP leaders have long urged their supporters to vote by mail. GOP governors are sounding the call for easy access to mail-in ballots (@DoyleMcManus for @latimes):

latimes.com/politics/story… Image
39/

@Heritage election fraud database reports just 143 convictions involving fraudulent use of absentee ballots over the past 20 years (approx. 0.00006% of total votes cast):

heritage.org/voterfraud Image
40/

@SenatorRomney says 90% of Utah Republicans vote by mail (@BudrykZack for @thehill):

thehill.com/homenews/senat… Image
41/

"There is no evidence that mail balloting results in rampant voter fraud" (@AmberMcReynolds & @cstewartiii for @thehill):

thehill.com/opinion/campai… Image
42/

Former Republican campaign strategist compares president to "the boy who cried wolf" in spreading panic and undermining faith in the electoral process, to the detriment of his own base. (@grace_panetta for @businessinsider):

businessinsider.com/trumps-crusade… Image
43/

@KimWyman12, Republican @secstatewa, supports vote by mail. (@llerer for @nytimes):

nytimes.com/2020/04/15/us/… Image
44/

Research on vote by mail shows neutral partisan effects. (May Wong, @SIEPR):

siepr.stanford.edu/news/new-resea… Image
45/

"Trump casts doubt on mail voting. His campaign promotes it." (@NickRiccardi for @AP):

apnews.com/6416231367cfa0… Image
46/

In 2017, the risk of mail-in vote fraud was 0.0004% to 0.0009% (@hopeyen1 & Calvin Woodward for @AP Fact Check, quoting @BrennanCenter):

apnews.com/e45b0fd875cd2b… Image
47/

Former Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Reagan, @LarryKorb: "U.S. troops routinely vote by mail. Why can't the rest of America do the same?" (@MilitaryTimes):

militarytimes.com/opinion/commen… Image
48/

@leedrutman for @FiveThirtyEight: "There is no evidence that vote by mail gives one party an advantage":

fivethirtyeight.com/features/there… Image
49/

Justin Levitt (@_justinlevitt_): "Each act of voter fraud in connection with a federal election risks 5 years in prison....a single extra vote is simply not worth the price." (@BrennanCenter @nyulaw):

brennancenter.org/sites/default/… Image
50/

Oh, and I (@EllenLWeintraub) have also spoken on the topic: "Democrats have studied this, Republicans have studied this, and no one can find any evidence of rampant voter fraud either historically or particularly in the 2016 elections."

thehill.com/homenews/admin… Image
51/

To sum up:

Many Americans will be voting by mail this year. In the 2016 general election, 139 million people voted overall; even more could do so this year.
52/

With that many voters, could a few instances of illegal voting activity crop up?

Perhaps.

But there is no basis to claim that it will be anything other than exceedingly rare.
53/

Facts matter. Data matters. When Prof. @_justinlevitt_ researched in-person voter fraud between 2000 and 2014, he found just 31 credible allegations – just *allegations*! – out of more than a *billion* ballots cast.

washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2… Image
54/

Research by U. of Wisconsin & Stanford political scientists “indicate[d] that the proportion of the population reporting voter impersonation is indistinguishable from that reporting abduction by extraterrestrials.”

liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.108… Image
55/

The numbers are similarly tiny for voting by mail. Even the Heritage Foundation’s voter-fraud database contains only 13 instances of absentee voter fraud across the 5 states that had all-mail balloting going into this year: CO, HI, OR, UT, & WA.

nytimes.com/2020/05/18/opi… Image
56/

Voting by mail will not make the 2020 election substantially fraudulent or massively corrupt.

There is no basis for that claim.

None. Zero. Zip. Nada.
57/

Specifically:

There is no basis for the claim that the election will be substantially fraudulent or massively corrupt due to mailbox robbery.

There is no basis for the claim that the election will be substantially fraudulent or massively corrupt due to ballot forgery.
58/

There is no basis for the claim that the election will be substantially fraudulent or massively corrupt due to illegal ballot printing.
59/

There is no basis for the claim that the election will be substantially fraudulent or massively corrupt due to fraudulently signed ballots.
60/

There is no basis for the claim that the election will be substantially fraudulent or massively corrupt due to voters being told for whom to vote.
61/

There is no basis for the claim that the election will be substantially fraudulent or massively corrupt due to a cheating free-for-all.
62/

There is no basis for the claim that the election will be substantially fraudulent or massively corrupt due to a forgery free-for-all.
63/

There is no basis for the claim that the election will be substantially fraudulent or massively corrupt due to a ballot theft free-for-all.
64/

Claims that voter fraud is widespread are, as shown above, “dead wrong,” “crying ‘wolf,’” “false,” “a debunked lie.”
65/

Such falsehoods are not mere words.

These falsehoods may well undermine the American people's faith in our democracy.

And the *real* fraud would be if U.S. citizens were deterred from voting and our government reflected the consent of fewer of the governed.
66/

True leaders speak truth.

Especially in an election season plagued by pandemic, economic uncertainty, and death, the American people deserve nothing less than the truth from our leaders.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ellen L. Weintraub (@ellenlweintraub on threads)

Ellen L. Weintraub (@ellenlweintraub on threads) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EllenLWeintraub

Oct 28, 2022
🔥NEW!: @FEC GOP commissioners are so eager to grease the skids for corporate spending in US elections that they don’t seem to care where the money comes from, including, in a matter just released, money from – I kid you not – *Russian oligarchs.* This is, in a word, alarming. 🧵
@FEC The Republicans ignored an @FEC investigation that revealed that a US corporation that spent on a number of US elections was overwhelmingly owned by Russian oligarchs and had nothing but Russian funds in the bank.

@ShanaMBroussard and I wrote about it: fec.gov/files/legal/mu…
@FEC Worse, when they went to explain themselves, the Republicans disregarded decades of Commission precedent, governing law, legal logic, and the interests of the United States.

Their misrepresentations demanded a direct response, and they’re getting one:

fec.gov/files/legal/mu…
Read 5 tweets
Sep 30, 2022
Sad to report: @FEC announced today the dismissal of a slew of important cases on key issues like dark money, soft money & coordination. Several of us had worked hard over the past few years to keep these matters alive in the face of obstructionist colleagues and bad caselaw. 🧵
@FEC These efforts involved a activating a previously unused, alternative enforcement path that Congress wrote into our governing statute.

There is still hope that the American people's interests can be vindicated, at least in these matters.
@FEC This path allows those who file complaints to sue those they allege have violated the law when @FEC fails to act. The strategy was working. Today's dismissals should not affect those existing lawsuits – the dismissals have not cured the injury that allowed those suits to proceed.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 15, 2022
🧵 The @FEC gave @Google what it asked for last Thursday: Permission to launch a program exempting political email from Gmail's spam filters.

The legal ship has now sailed, but the policy question remains: *Should* Google flood Gmail users' in-boxes with spammy political email?
@FEC @Google I voted against allowing Google to pursue its plan, not because of the public's huge and breathtakingly hostile reaction to the program, but because I believe that, legally, what Google proposed was prohibited in-kind corporate contributions to federal political campaigns.
@FEC @Google But I think the commenters had the policy issue right. Google's unofficial motto is "Don't be evil." I'm not sure dumping spam into in-boxes counts as "evil," but it does run counter to the guiding principle to "make Google more useful for all our users."

abc.xyz/investor/other…
Read 7 tweets
Jul 14, 2022
This morning at the @FEC's open meeting, Commissioner Trey Trainor (@txelectionlaw) decided to "pass judgment" on a requestor asking the Commission about childcare rules.

He called the requestor’s need for childcare "abhorrent."

Video:
@FEC @TXElectionLaw The discussion concerned an advisory opinion request from @RepSwalwell that asked whether he could use campaign funds to pay for overnight childcare when traveling on congressional or political business.

Details: fec.gov/data/legal/adv…
@FEC @TXElectionLaw @RepSwalwell Verbatim: “To be real honest with you, I'm actually going to pass judgment on it. I think it's abhorrent that Congressman Swalwell would have such a young child and want to leave them in the care of someone else for a weeklong trip overseas."

@FEC Commissioner Trey Trainor
Read 5 tweets
Jun 27, 2022
First Amendment thread!🧵Follow along! ⬇️

Not only was the GOP @FEC commissioners' blocking of a $781.6 million complaint against Trump & his campaign contrary to law and not only did it carry the unmistakable stench of partisanship…. 

…it was also just the latest attempt to discredit U.S. news media as appropriate sources of information for @FEC complaints.
When Complainants or our lawyers cite news reports, the Commission evaluates the overall credibility of those news reports and, necessarily, the news organizations that produced them. Make no mistake: that is what our Republican colleagues rejected in this matter.
Read 11 tweets
Apr 25, 2022
“Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy,” says @elonmusk, @Twitter’s likely new owner.

One of Twitter’s challenges in supporting democracy is to avoid spreading disinformation like wildfire. And content moderation isn't the only way to slow disinformation down. 🧵
@elonmusk @Twitter A wildfire requires not just a spark to start the fire but also wind to fan the flames. On Twitter, algorithms are the wind. Musk says he wants to open-source Twitter's algorithms. But algorithms' effects don't depend on whether you can find their source code on Github.
@elonmusk @Twitter It's how they're tuned. At the moment, social media companies' algorithms "exploit the basic human compulsion to react to material that outrages," as I wrote in the Georgetown Law Technology Review in 2020.

georgetownlawtechreview.org/wp-content/upl…
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(