It would be a mistake to go straight to the question of whether the policy articulated in the president’s draft executive order, which sets out to limit immunity for social media platforms that restrict access to content, is the right one. 1/6
That debate is important, but Congress has already weighed in and provided broad immunity. It passed a law. Some members want to change that law, but so far, they haven’t been successful in convincing a majority of Congress to go along. 2/6
The president is trying to short-circuit the legislative process and change the law… through executive order. That’s not how it works, folks. And couching it as a request for the FCC to issue “clarifying” regulations doesn’t change what the president’s trying to do here. 3/6
The courts have already clarified what the law means. That’s *their* job in our constitutional system. The president’s job is to faithfully execute the law as interpreted by the courts—which looks nothing like the “clarification” proposed in his executive order. 4/6
Of course, faithfully executing the law isn’t Trump’s jam. He wants to be all three branches of government: the executive, the legislature, and the courts. That’s the very definition of tyranny, which is why the separation of powers is the bedrock of the Constitution. 5/6
So let’s have a debate over the role of social media platforms in our society and whether Congress got it right. But first, let’s condemn the president’s executive order for what it is: a blatant attempt to bypass Congress and amend legislation by presidential fiat. 6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Defense Department has confirmed that U.S. Marines detained a civilian—reportedly an Army veteran who crossed a yellow tape boundary on his way to a Department of Veterans Affairs office. This is an apparent violation of the Posse Comitatus Act. 1/16 reuters.com/world/us/us-ma…
The Posse Comitatus Act (PCA) bars federal armed forces from directly participating in law enforcement activities unless “expressly authorized” by statute or by the Constitution. It’s a critical protection for individual liberty and democracy. 2/16
What constitutes a law enforcement activity for purpose of the PCA isn’t always clear. But activities that unambiguously fall within that category include arrests, searches, and seizures of persons or property. 3/16 congress.gov/crs-product/R4…
A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) requiring Trump to return control of the National Guard to CA Governor Newsom. The order is accompanied by a powerful opinion that affirms the rule of law, separation of powers, and the First Amendment. 1/23
U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer found that CA is likely to succeed on the merits of some of its claims, which is the first and often most important criterion for issuing a TRO. To start, the law Trump relied on to federalize the Guard didn’t give him that authority. 2/23
That law, 10 USC 12406, applies only if there’s an invasion by a foreign nation or a “rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States,” or if the President is unable to execute federal law without using the military. 3/23
Trump has federalized at least 2,000 National Guard forces and reportedly plans to deploy troops to Los Angeles over Governor Newsom’s objections. If that happens, it will be the first time since 1965 that a president has sent troops into a state without a state request. 1/19
That’s alarming enough. But Trump has also authorized deployment of troops anywhere in the country where protests against ICE are occurring or are likely to occur, even if they are entirely peaceful. That is unprecedented and a clear abuse of the law. 2/19
To back up: Presidents have deployed troops for purposes of quelling unrest or executing the law only 30 times in U.S. history. The Brennan Center has published a guide compiling and annotating those instances. 3/19 brennancenter.org/our-work/resea…
Yesterday the Brennan Center filed an amicus brief in support of four companies that challenged Trump’s imposition of worldwide tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). 1/15 brennancenter.org/our-work/court…
Trump imposed the tariffs by declaring a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act (NEA), which gives him access to standby powers contained in 150 different provisions of law, including IEEPA. 2/15 brennancenter.org/our-work/resea…
The main issue currently before the court is whether IEEPA authorizes tariffs at all. The law doesn’t use the word “tariffs,” but the Trump administration wants the court to read sweeping powers into the law that aren’t explicitly conferred. 3/15
What’s this new executive order directing the Defense Department to take over huge swaths of public land on the border? Simple: it’s yet another abuse of emergency powers—this one seemingly designed to make an end-run around the Posse Comitatus Act. 1/17 whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
Listing all of Trump’s abuses of emergency powers thus far would make this thread far too long. But the country is still reeling from the latest one: emergency tariffs imposed on every country in the world, including islands inhabited primarily by penguins. 2/17
And then there’s Trump’s abuse of the Alien Enemies Act—a law that applies only during an armed attack by a foreign nation or government—to stealthily deport 137 Venezuelans, 75% of whom have no criminal record whatsoever, to an El Salvador prison that’s a living hell. 3/17
To get around the normal legal process for imposing tariffs on Canada & Mexico, Trump declared national emergencies and invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Another day, another executive action, another abuse of power. 1/15
IEEPA is available only to address an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to our “national security, foreign policy, or economy.” So Trump declared that Canada… the country he has mocked as the 51st state… poses an unusual and extraordinary threat to our national security. 2/15
Got that? In his social media posts, Trump says Canada is barely a “viable Country.” But in declaring a national emergency, he says that Canada’s power over the United States is so great that it threatens our very security. Quite a concession to our northern neighbor. 3/15