Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
M. Nolan Gray 🥑 Profile picture
@mnolangray
May 29, 2020 • 4 tweets • 2 min read • Read on X
#JusticeForGeorge ImageImage
#GeorgeFloyd ImageImageImage
I don't know who told the two officers to drive directly into the crowd but they almost lit a powder keg...
...a potentially very crazy situation, averted only by organizers stepping in.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with M. Nolan Gray 🥑

M. Nolan Gray 🥑 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mnolangray

M. Nolan Gray 🥑 Profile picture
Aug 22
Something I've been thinking about a lot: In a recent 5Cast episodes, Andrew Callaghan made an off-hand comment about how nearly all of the recently-minted conspiracy theorists he has talked to mention "Ancient Aliens" as being a watershed moment.
I don't think it should be illegal, but whew buddy, a major outlet branding itself as "The History Channel" running content like this was profoundly unethical. In an entertainment industry with a backbone, anyone involved in that slop is blacklisted.
Netlix is doing the same thing with "Ancient Apocalypse." It's not just that these shows promote bullshit. It's not even that they conclude that entire hard sciences are bullshit. It's that they promote a mode of thinking that breaks peoples brain and corrodes social trust.
Read 6 tweets
M. Nolan Gray 🥑 Profile picture
Jul 29
In recent years, supply-and-demand denying interest groups have cajoled state legislators in Sacranento from excluding any housing that has hosted a renter in the last X number of years from using state housing laws legalizing a lot more housing...
...bad actor cities like LA then make the problem worse by shifting the burden of proof on homeowners. Many normal people give up, and projects don't proceed.
In this case, this house will either remain a dump or flip into an expensive single-family home, when it could have been four apartments. (Or with SB 1123, up to 10.) Is this a win for equity? Of course not.
Read 5 tweets
M. Nolan Gray 🥑 Profile picture
Jul 2
SB 79 is live in Assembly Housing! Image
@Scott_Wiener cayimby.org/legislation/sb…
@Scott_Wiener Councilmember @JedLeano speaking in support! Image
Read 15 tweets
M. Nolan Gray 🥑 Profile picture
Jul 1
The impossible has become possible: we've passed a clean CEQA infill exemption. This is probably the most important thing California has done on housing in the present YIMBY moment. Image
I explain the significance of this historic win in this thread. 👇
If your Assemblymember and/or Senator voted AYE, please take a moment to CALL or EMAIL them to say THANKS! We need more courageous votes like this if we're going to end the California housing crisis!
Read 7 tweets
M. Nolan Gray 🥑 Profile picture
Jun 28
You've probably been hearing a lot about budget bills, environmental reviews, and labor fights out here on the West Coast. It's all adding up to probably the biggest policy change in modern California history. Here's a breakdown for the perplexed. Image
In 1970, California joined various states in mandating that all public projects undertake an environmental review, disclosing and mitigating impacts. This made sense amid a frenzy of freeways, urban renewal, etc. Thus, CEQA: the California Environmental Quality Act. Image
The enforcement mechanism was intuitive: if an environmental review should have been conducted and wasn't, or failed to study some relevant impact, or failed to undertake reasonable mitigation, nearly anyone could easily sue and force the issue. Image
Read 20 tweets
M. Nolan Gray 🥑 Profile picture
Mar 25
In my experience, asking developers what they think will get more housing built nearly gets you an answer tied to a specific cell on their most recent project proforma, e.g. drive down interest rates, lower fees, etc. It makes sense: this what they spend all day thinking about.
Asking a fish about water, etc. They build homes, they don't do policy. It's weird to expect them to center hard-to-quantify things like entitlement risk, or upstream determinants of inputs like land costs, which are increased by restrictive zoning.
Nor is the modal developer especially good at imagining what would make entirely new classes of development work, e.g. missing middle. Usually just a glib, "nobody builds that/will build that." Of course, that was true of ADUs before statewide California legalization.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(