Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Robert Sharp रोबर्ट शार्प Profile picture
@robertsharp59
Jun 2, 2020 • 4 tweets • 7 min read • Read on X
Meanwhile, the judgment in Serafin v Malkiewicz will be handed down tomorrow

Its a crucial libel case - the first time the @UKSupremeCourt has considered the new s.4 'public interest' defence.

#LibelReform @SLSingh @davidallengreen @senseaboutsci @englishpen @IndexCensorship
@UKSupremeCourt @SLSingh @davidallengreen @senseaboutsci @englishpen @IndexCensorship Serafin v Malkiewicz case details are here. You can read a summary of the case and also watch the hearings from March
bit.ly/302Qsee
@UKSupremeCourt @SLSingh @davidallengreen @senseaboutsci @englishpen @IndexCensorship Thanks @SLSingh for the lightning quick RT! Takes me back to the heady days of 2012 #LibelReform campaign!
@UKSupremeCourt @SLSingh @davidallengreen @senseaboutsci @englishpen @IndexCensorship Case is also relevant for Scotland and Northern Ireland. In both cases the respective Law Commissions have draft Defamation Bills ready to be debated by the devolved parliaments, with 'public interest' clauses included.

@mjrharris @PaulConnollyNI @mePadraigReidy @ScottishPEN

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Robert Sharp रोबर्ट शार्प

Robert Sharp रोबर्ट शार्प Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @robertsharp59

Robert Sharp रोबर्ट शार्प Profile picture
Dec 8, 2020
The replies to this tweet/op-ed are full of people reminding David Lammy about the shocking abuse of the Bengalis by Churchill, and reminding us of some of his greatest, racist quotes. This prompts a quick thought... 1/n
Perhaps we tolerate obvious rights-abusers like Churchill in our national story because, regardless of the bad things they did, they set us on a trajectory that we nevertheless approve of (at least in the context that Lammy is talking about in the article). 2/n
We celebrate Churchill’s promotion of human rights and overlook his violations because (done right) they lead inexorably towards a situation where Churchill’s own abuse of colonised people would be prevented or punished. 3/n
Read 11 tweets
Robert Sharp रोबर्ट शार्प Profile picture
Dec 8, 2020
Gah. I just managed to pocket dial someone, and then unwittingly left a 6 minute voicemail of various domestic conversations. I’m absolutely mortified.
I say ‘pocket dial’ but what I actually did was press the button on my Bluetooth headphones to try and switch off the podcast I was listening to. I think Siri must have activated, and interpreted whatever I said as a request to call someone. 2/n
This is an entirely 21st Century embarrassment, made possible only through the invention of at least three major technologies (mobile phones, Bluetooth, voice recognition), with my bright red face at their confluence. 3/n
Read 9 tweets
Robert Sharp रोबर्ट शार्प Profile picture
Sep 27, 2020
This crazy story about a university claiming that posters in a window “break the law” is a good example of how chaotic and inconsistent law-making can lead to a denial of liberty. Quick thread. 1/n
I’ve been doing some reading on the ‘chilling effect’ recently. It’s usually used with regards to freedom of expression, but it’s a term imported from US legal thought, and can be applied to any kind of liberty or lawful activity. 2/n
Supreme Court Justice William Brennan warned of how a ‘chill’ can be “generated by vagueness, overbreadth and unbridled discretion” of laws/state powers used to curb speech. (Dissent in Walker v City of Birmingham, 388 US 307 in 1967)
3/n
Read 17 tweets
Robert Sharp रोबर्ट शार्प Profile picture
Sep 24, 2020
My first thought when reading this was to think of a solution. What barristers had some kind of badge? Or what if barrister wigs and gowns were reinstated in Magistrates Courts?

This was the wrong thought. Because...
We shouldn’t need freakin’ badges to stop people making racist assumptions.

If I had the emoji keyboard installed then between every word in that sentence would be a clap icon.
ASIDE: The other day I experienced the opposite of this. I had to go to hospital for a thing, and I turn up in my generic work clothes - smart shoes, trousers, shirt, no tie - with my office lanyard around my neck.
Read 5 tweets
Robert Sharp रोबर्ट शार्प Profile picture
Sep 23, 2020
Right so I know this is probably a first world problem but I’m going to indulge myself with a moan about... plastic bags from @Ocado 1/6
During the spring lockdown, we were pretty conscientious about avoiding the shops and doing more online deliveries.

At about the same time, @Ocado stopped its programme of recycling plastic bags, because that could obviously be a source of virus transmission. 2/6
The problem with this is that every time we have a delivery, we get about a dozen plastic bags. In the before times, I would just hand bags from the previous shop back to the delivery driver and get a 5p rebate. But recently they’ve been piling up in the garage. 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Robert Sharp रोबर्ट शार्प Profile picture
Sep 12, 2020
One thing I think about a lot is what headlines and political messaging would look like if liberals/progressive adopted some of the tabloidy, accuracy-stretching tactics we see deployed by the Johnson right. This news story might be a good case study.
‘Johnson set your opt out of human rights laws’ reads the headline. Now, if you read the article, you’ll see that he wants to opt out of very specific human rights measures, on immigration and when soliders can be prosecuted for acts committed while on operations.
However, one can argue that to derogate from some provisions in the human rights laws and treaties is to undermine the entire framework. And if that’s true, then attacking one human right is to attack them all.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(