When the charge of third degree murder and the alternative charge of manslaughter were laid against #Chauvin, the @ACLU criticised the 3rd degree murder charge as being “legally defective.” #GeorgeFloyd
@ACLU highlighted: "Third Degree Murder applies only when the acts of the defendant were committed without regard to their effect on any particular person, and not when the actions were directed to a specific person." #GeorgeFloyd
@ACLU said since 1896 to present, Minnesota courts have repeatedly ruled that to support a charge of 3rd deg murder, the offender’s actions need to be ‘eminently dangerous to more than one person.’ #GeorgeFloyd
I personally find this interesting and I know some of you will because you asked whether the prosecution charged a third degree murder as it would be easier to prove. If the ACLU is correct, it would seem the opposite is true. #GeorgeFloyd
The case prosecutor has since changed and the matter is now in the hands of the Minnesota attorney general, Keith Ellison (ie a state rather than county level prosecutor) #GeorgeFloyd
Keith Ellison has added a charge of second degree murder (again, this doesn’t exist in the UK where we simply have either murder or manslaughter charges) #GeorgeFloyd
2nd deg murder carries a max of 40y. Higher than the 25y max for 3rd deg murder and you’ll note from the wording of the charge, it’s ‘unintentional.’ Prosecution need to prove #Chauvin committed a felony, here an assault in the 3rd degree, which killed #GeorgeFloyd
What's a 3rd degree assault? See screenshot of the statute. #GeorgeFloyd
What's substantial bodily harm? See screenshot. How will they prove it? Check the next tweet #GeorgeFloyd
There are two autopsy reports in this case. One from the prosecution team, one from independent MEs instructed by #GeorgeFloyd's family.
The 2 autopsy reports rules homicide But note the difference. The autopsy from the #Floyd family specifies asphyxia while the other says no evidence of manual asphyxia but that the restraint triggered a heart attack. Pros report does make reference to neck compression.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 To journalists contacting me about the recent developments with the #StephenLawrence case. I don't have much to say without sounding like a broken record. I say the below entirely in my own capacity:
I've become friends with Stuart Lawrence. This year marked the 30th anniversary of Stephen's murder. I attended an event with Stuart a few months ago where he was asked by a police org to, once again speak about racism in policing, the investigation & how it affected his family.
Stuart cried on stage that day. He spoke about the pressure he feels to be positive and to be honest, it broke me. I am heartbroken by the number of times the victims of murder have to become activists, spokespersons and pioneers to receive even a semblance of justice.
They've concluded that the system of accountability for racism and racial discrimination in deaths of Black people following police contact is not fit for purpose. 🧵
Black people are 7 times more likely than white people to die following police restraint.
The role of racism in these deaths is not substantially scrutinised.
Chris's mum shared how much joy he brought to her home. How he shone a light. How he would go out to his way to ensure she was happy
Chris's dad has spoken about the moment he was called and informed his son had been shot by the police. His voice broke as he shared that it wasn't until 12h after Chris had died that he received the news.
1. I saw this article and paused at the headline for a moment wondering whether to retweet it. To me the issue was much more fundamental than this but less straightforward to explain. independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…
2. One of my duties as @policeISOB chair is to ask challenging questions of the police; particularly of the ones in leadership positions within this programme.
3. On Friday, @CliveMyrieBBC asked both me and DAC Amanda Pearson to provide examples of the most egregious instances of racism that we'd seen or experienced. He clarified that this could be personally or professionally.
These Kilclooney tweets are a real insight into racism
1. Does something racist
2. Doubles down on said racism using the "I know one or two ppl of that race" excuse
3. Denies it's racist and lies to shift the goalposts. But the lie actually reinforces the racism by again showing he thought it was acceptable to call Kamala Harris "the Indian". Also just an unbelievable lie tbh.
1. Many missing the point. Black lawyers are exhausted when mistaken for a defendant because black defendants are overrepresented in the criminal justice system. It is a SYMPTOM of the over-criminalisation of black people.
2. It reminds us that people who work in the CJS are so used to seeing Black faces to the point that ANY Black face in the court room is a defendant. It shows the internal programming of those that work at court and how deep this issue runs.
3. The solution to this isn't just anti-racism training of course staff and the judicary. It's dealing with the wider issues of racism across the entire justice system that cause so many Black people to end up in docks of court in the first place