It is hilarious when you refer to Kautilya's Arthaśāstra to try to prove that ancient Hindus practiced slavery, when Arthaśāstra says exactly the opposite.
Infact, Arthaśāstra says in no uncertain terms Hindus ("Aryas") shouldn't practice slavery under any circumstances!
Rana Safvi is hailed as a ground breaking historian and award winning author in secular Jamaat. Her entire work eulogizes Mughal invaders and Gangi Jamuni Tehzeeb.
This thread dissects and fact-checks some statements made by her. Thread (1)
We first examine some of the statements made by this "historian" which unveil the real "historical knowledge" she possesses.
After the dissection, we shall delve into the nature, motivation of her work, the powers behind her promotion and hype around her work. Let us begin (2)
Rana Safvi posted a picture. She claimed that this structure was found during excavations from
Bet Dwaraka (Gujarat).
This verse is a part of the section which describes the very popular narrative of Vyasa requesting Ganesha to become the writer of Mahābhārata on Brahma's advice. Ganesha instantly agrees. This is followed by a comparison of Parvas of Mahabharata with the branches of a tree
While this section is found in Southern (Kumbakonam) and Bengal recensions, it is absent in Sharada, Newari and Malayalam recensions etc of Vyasa Mahabharata.
As a result, the entire section was removed in the critical edition(which was used for translation by Shri Bibek Debroy)
In the sculptures of Mathura and Badami and also in several later day depictions, Vishnu DOES NOT place his foot upon Bali. The laughing face in the sky is Rahu.
You seem to be absolutely clueless about conventions of early Indian art.
This alleged verse is quite popular in modern Hindu and Hindutva circles. It is often passed off as a verse from Mahābhārata. But it has ABSOLUTELY ZERO scriptural basis and is a modern creation.
Infact, NOWHERE in entire Sanskrit literature is हिंसा ever equated to धर्म
When you tell modern Hindus this verse is fake, their knee jerk reaction is "but this verse even if fake is essence of Mahābhārata which is about righteous war".
This misconception arises coz their understanding of what हिंसा entails is different from how ancients understood it
Here is a fascinating map of all the places of ancient India as mentioned in Mahābhārata. This map is put on display in Purana Qila, which is the ancient Indraprastha of Mahābhārata.
Take a look at the map and see the name of your region during those days.
Mahābhārata is simply the encyclopedia of ancient India. The geographical details are very comprehensive. Below in this thread, I shall elaborate upon every region (2/n)
To the NW in Afghanistan is country of Yavanas, the Bactrian Indo-Greeks (Modern Begram). To their East in Hindukush is the country of Aśvakas and Kāmbojas. The Kamviri Nuristanis of Afghanistan, Kamboj of Punjab and Kammas of Andhra Pradesh could be their partial descendants.