@KenCaldeira and I have a new study out, “Empirical prediction of short‐term annual global temperature variability” which presents a methodology for forecasting global average temperature variability on interannual timescales. Our live forecast is here: weatherclimatehumansystems.org/global-tempera…
The full paper is: Brown, P. T., & Caldeira, K. (2020). Empirical prediction of short‐term annual global temperature variability. Earth and Space Science, 7, e2020EA001116. doi.org/10.1029/2020EA…
Some background: Global temperature variability on sub-decadal timescales can be of substantial magnitude relative to the long-term rate of global warming.
For example, global temperature increased by ~0.42°C over the 5 years between 2011 and 2016. This is equivalent to approximately three decades worth of long‐term warming (~0.14°C per decade since the middle of the twentieth century) over a short period.
Also, subdecadal global temperature variability has an extensive spatial footprint in the sense that approximately 87% of the global surface and 99% of the global land surface exemplifies a positive linear relationship between local and global temperature deviations.
Therefore, it is not surprising that this type of short-term global average temperature variability has been shown to have considerable environmental and societal effects.
This is particularly the case because extremes like the global frequency and extent of heatwaves scale with the global average temperature:
See e.g., Fischer, E. M., & @Knutti_ETH (2015). Anthropogenic contribution to global occurrence of heavy‐precipitation and high‐temperature extremes. Nature Climate Change, 5, 560. doi.org/10.1038/nclima…
Thus, downstream impacts of anomalous heat are wide-ranging; they have been associated with phenomena as diverse as primary production, the distribution of fish, coral bleaching, agricultural output, economic growth, energy demand, human mortality & migration, & civil conflicts.
This is why we hope that accurate foreknowledge of annual global temperature anomalies will be of some value for risk mitigation purposes. See an AMS talk for subsequent work with @climateai on a more direct application to relevant impacts: ams.confex.com/ams/2020Annual…
Our methodology utilizes only global spatial patterns of annual mean surface air temperature anomalies to predict subsequent annual global temperature anomalies via partial least squares regression.
The method's skill is primarily achieved via information on the state of long‐term global warming as well as the state and recent evolution of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation and the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation.
For the task of predicting global temperature anomalies one to four years ahead of time, we find that our method is skillful relative to simple "naive" benchmarks and it typically outperforms global climate models initialized to the observed state of the climate system.
Additionally, our method is much less computationally expensive than forecasts made with global climate models.
We will update our forecast monthly and we will also keep tabs of the chances that any given year will be a new record and/or the chances that it will breach the Paris Accord-associated limit of 1.5°C. Our live forecast is here: weatherclimatehumansystems.org/global-tempera…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Do Climate Attribution Studies Tell the Full Story?
How a cascade of selection effects bias the collective output of extreme event attribution studies. 🧵
Over the past decades, there has been an explosion in Extreme Event Attribution (EEA) studies focusing on (“triggered by”) some prior notable weather or climate extreme.
The collective output of these kinds of studies certainly gives the impression that human-caused climate change is drastically changing all kinds of weather extremes. This is probably reflected in a marked increase in Google searches on the topic.
In a 2nd Trump presidency, rather than doubling down on the misguided notion that science is an authority that can fully dictate policy, scientists should strive to delineate between strict scientific facts and their political preferences. 🧵
Much like the Democratic party as a whole, scientists and their institutions (universities, research labs, professional societies, journals) are reflecting on the election results, especially what they signal in terms of public trust in science and expertise.
2023 set a record for global temperature in the instrumental era, breaching the 1.5°C 'limit' for the first time.
But global temperature itself is not very relevant to impacts. So where did 2023 come in, in terms of those more impact-relevant climate changes? 🧵
The Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society released its annual "State of the Climate" report last month. Below, I highlight some of their cataloged trends, ranking them roughly from intuitive to more surprising.
First, sea level continues to ⬆️ due to land ice melting and the thermal expansion of the ocean. A sea level rise of 110 mm from 1993 to 2023 corresponds to approximately 1.4 inches per decade or 1.20 feet per century, though this rate is expected to accelerate.
California’s Massive Park Fire Would be Less Severe if We Proactively Reduced Fuels.🧵
The Park Fire shows that both a lack of active management on US Forest Service land and land management optimized for timber production are far from ideal for wildfire safety.
As of today, August 14th, the Park Fire has burned nearly 430,000 acres (672 square miles), or about 65% of the size of the state of Rhode Island. It is officially still only 40% contained and has destroyed over 600 structures.
The Park Fire currently stands as California’s fourth-largest fire since meticulous record-keeping began in the 1980s, and by itself, it has burned more area than that from all California fires in the calendar years of either 2022 or 2023.
Is climate change driving massive increases in severe thunderstorm costs and causing “The Possible Collapse of the U.S. Home Insurance System” as @nytimes reports?
There is a large and growing gap between climate science and the reporting coming from 'climate desks'…🧵
It is true that both US billion-dollar disasters and global insured disaster losses are increasing, and a large fraction of the overall increase seems to be driven by increases in losses from severe thunderstorms.
But what, specifically, does climate science say about historical and expected changes in severe thunderstorms and their associated hazards of tornadoes and hail?
When considering the risk of natural disasters like floods, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has adopted a useful framework for breaking down the risk of impacts.
This is useful for considering the underlying causes of any changes in flood disasters because, on the many-decade timescales that climate change progresses, there will not only be changes in the hazard but also changes in exposure and vulnerability.