A timeline of Keng article
May 2012 - Rappler publishes, citing intel report, w/ side from Keng via phone call. (Story about Corona, not him)
Feb 2014 - Rappler corrects typo. Keng claims he was triggered by this (I can't imagine how he knew it was edited hindi naman na-repush)
May 2012 - Rappler publishes, citing intel report, w/ side from Keng via phone call. (Story about Corona, not him)
Feb 2014 - Rappler corrects typo. Keng claims he was triggered by this (I can't imagine how he knew it was edited hindi naman na-repush)
2016 - Keng reaches out to Rappler with a PDEA clearance (intel report not from PDEA) and wants to take down the 2012 article which was not about him.
Rappler had to verify PDEA doc, for a clarification, to a 4-year-old article.
Rappler had to verify PDEA doc, for a clarification, to a 4-year-old article.
In 2014, dissenters in the Supreme Court wanted to remove the clause on assumed malice in defamatory imputations. They were overruled. 6 years later, the Manila court rules malice was assumed because Keng is a private citizen.
Again, the story was about Corona.
Again, the story was about Corona.
As one of the petitioners in the Supreme Court, surely you know and understand this 'no @attyharryroque? :)
As @glendamgloria says: "The court is not a gatekeeper of journalistic standards. It is a gatekeeper of a more basic right that is enshrined in the Consitution: the right to a free press and the principle of checks and balances in a democracy."
