Emily Galvin-Almanza Profile picture
Jun 16, 2020 15 tweets 4 min read Read on X
So, my friend @spiceybinks asked me about prison gerrymandering. Which may seem like a kind of far-off issue...counting people *in prison* as "residents" of a district for the purpose of allocating representation.

But it's actually a factor perpetuating police violence.
As many have pointed out (including one of my favorite humans @Taniel) it goes like this:

Black and brown people are policed more aggressively
They get locked up in prison at dramatically higher rates
Prisons are often far away from their homes in conservative districts.
So the result here is that very white, conservative districts are able to *increase their voting power* by incarcerating primarily BIPOC.

Think about that.
There's a really helpful overview on places where this is still happening, which I've provided here. But gerrymandering is just half the picture.

theappeal.org/politicalrepor…
People who are incarcerated are stripped of their voting power basically everywhere. Over 6 million people have lost the right to be heard in our society because of a criminal conviction.

sentencingproject.org/publications/f…
So here's where we're at: Black and brown people policed at higher rates, incarcerated at higher rates, stripped of their political voice at higher rates AND their population power given to whiter, more conservative districts.
Sheriffs are elected. City and county councilmembers who make decisions about policing...mayors...governors...prosecutors...they're elected.

But when you look at who is electing them, you have to remember how many people have been silenced.
All of which is to say, voting is vital and hugely important. But your vote--my vote--all of our votes are not enough if they only represent what we want for ourselves. It's vital to use your political power to vote on behalf of those who cannot, and work to restore their rights.
The only way we'll dismantle the structures of oppression is together. It's hard work. It means learning every fucking detail about your local DA even if you yourself are unlikely to ever engage with them.
And it also means having a heightened awareness of how the skewing of the basic institutions of democracy has preserved police violence and mass incarceration for so long.
Oh one more thing--if anyone tries to make you believe that the right to vote is somehow *traditionally* or normally tied to incarceration or wrongdoing...that's just not true. Want to know how we got felon disenfranchisement?

Slavery.
Not, like, sort of or metaphorically. After emancipation, slave-holding districts created "black codes," or criminal law designed to create reasons to arrest and jail Black people, and then lease their labor back to formerly slave-holding plantations. theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
Tying the right to vote to whether a person has a criminal record was *deliberately* developed to silence Black people once they got the right to vote.

So this is, in fact, a mechanism designed to suppress and marginalize the voices of a community that has perpetuated on and on.
OH AND ONE MORE THING!!! This is separate and apart from the structural racism perpetuating police violence.

Voting makes communities safer. Did you know that? I forgot I once did a thread on it, with links and research :) twitter.com/i/events/11066…
And if you want an up-to-date overview of where Black votes are being given to prison towns, here you go... theappeal.org/political-repo…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emily Galvin-Almanza

Emily Galvin-Almanza Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GalvinAlmanza

Jul 25
I'm sorry, I need to make a few points.

1. This is an awful tone to take, as a leader, when talking about government action to forcibly, sometimes violently, remove people from a place where they are seeking stability.
This tone is bad because it treats the circumstance of homelessness as if it were an overt, intentional action by the unhoused person. "No more excuses"? You think people saying "homelessness is not a crime, please don't treat it as such" are giving EXCUSES?
2. It's especially bad when you consider what sweeps do. Sweeps result in arrests, and displacement, but also strip people of all their worldly possessions.

vice.com/en/article/v74…
Read 8 tweets
Jul 3
The thing about the Trump immunity case is that yeah, to an extent it creates "King President" but tbh it much more creates "King SCOTUS." This is because what is an "official" act of the prez will of course be litigated and...
...who is waiting at the end of the road on all that litigation? King SCOTUS of course, who will get to decide what's official, what *evidence* is sufficiently tied to official acts to come in or not come in, and basically whether a case lives or dies.

And one more thing.
This whole idea of a job being so important that you get to be above the law? Yeah, that idea comes *straight* from the absolute mess of absolute and qualified immunity in policing and prosecution.

In my sector...
Read 9 tweets
Jun 29
You may have heard the term “Project 2025” floating around, and you may even have cracked open the 900+ page document yourself, only to see a lot of kind of bland, policy-wonk text. So let me crack through the policy-speak and tell you WTF is in this document.
This is, um, a long thread. But if you want a lot of info about Project 2025, all in one place, you've come to the right place.
This document is what Trump and his team will do if elected. It’s their document, their plan, their platform. So like…it’s not *me* saying what they’ll do, this is *them* saying so.
documentcloud.org/documents/2408…
Read 114 tweets
Apr 21
Oh brother. OK, so first someone with "Attorney for the State" in their bio asked me for...an example of there being a chasm between what the law allows and what justice would be. Which is a bit surprising to me, so I kinda ignored it. But you guys want it, here we go.
The person I'm quoting here informed me that the law is clearly written on paper, and any American can understand it, which...well...I wish that was the case, because then lawyers and courts wouldn't be as necessary (no more statutory interpretation!). BUT...
But it's true that there are laws written on paper. The problem is that (1) they are unequally applied and (2) they are more impossible to comply with for some people for reasons that are not their fault.
Read 27 tweets
Nov 24, 2023
This article is so good and so thorough and so sad

newrepublic.com/article/176854…
It's not just that college graduates bring vital services to a state like medical care and high-end tech work and innovation and development. It's also that it's hard to get valuable businesses to move to a state with horrible schools bc they will struggle to retain talent.
That's when you get into a situation where you can't open a new lucrative state business because the key engineering talent that you need doesn't want to live in a state with carceral policies and garbage schools. They have kids.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 14, 2023
Hey hey hey everyone, it's that time again! Your weekly @PFJ_USA video on something gross about your criminal legal system.

This week: the "Brady" rule, or, why oh why do prosecutors have such a hard time handing over evidence of innocence?
So basically, when a person is accused of a crime, the rules of our court system say that prosecutors have to turn over "discovery," which is the evidence they have against the person.

Makes sense, right? If they think someone is guilty, they should be able to show why.
And from a system perspective, handing over that evidence right away makes sense: if the evidence is overwhelming, the person might decide to plead guilty when faced with, like, a very clear videotape of them doing some crimes.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(