I've looked at the Bolton complaint, and a bit about the remedies portion t (electionlawblog.org/wp-content/upl…).
The suit seeks declaratory relief (saying Bolton breached agreements), a constructive trust (disgorging any profits), and what looks like an injunction /1
The suit seeks declaratory relief (saying Bolton breached agreements), a constructive trust (disgorging any profits), and what looks like an injunction /1
These are the two paragraphs of the complaint that suggest what the government might seek as a court order against Bolton (and his publisher and others working with him) to prevent publication of the book and disclosure of otherwise (supposedly protected) information /2 
On the book publication itself, the language requests a court order for Bolton to notify publisher that he's violated a duty of prepublication review and to delay distribution of and retrieve and dispose of copies of the book "insofar as he has the authority to do so" /3
But the book was reported in warehouses last week and could even be in the hands of bookstores right now. The government has not yet even asked for a temporary restraining order to make this happen. So hard to see how such a request wouldn't be moot by the time heard. /4
That's even assuming there would be no First Amendment problem with blocking review (which of course would be a major issue given that this is a classic "prior restraint"). So the chances of an order blocking publication seem quite low. /5
The other part of the requested injunctive relief, to stop Bolton from publicly disclosing information in the book before the government has granted permission also seems likely mooted by release of the book, and it would raise similar (or greater!) First Amendment objections. /6
Whether the government could get the other relief it seeks (declaratory relief and disgorgement of Bolton's profits via a constructive trust) depends upon how strong the breach of contract/fiduciary duty claims are, an issue I'll have to defer to others with more knowledge. /7
But given the late timing and the potentially large constitutional problem, why is the government asking for relief that it is very unlikely to get? Perhaps it is because Mr. Barr's boss would like him to make that request, and Barr is obliging. /8
It may be no more than a complaint written for an audience of one, more about looking tough against Bolton and claiming he's violating the law than about getting actual court relief (at least on the injunctive side). /9
