1/ So, I did a quick analysis of cable news pre-rally coverage. Looked at the period between 12-5PM. Here's how much time CNN and MSNBC spent discussing Trump's rally today during that period. (Note: There's context to consider here, hence the thread).
2/ Much of the coverage centered around the risk, harms and damage associated with the rally as well as coverage of the 6 Trump staffers that tested positive for Covid. So, it wasn't a pass or raw Trump boosting by any means.
3/ Both hyped crowdsizes a bit. MSNBC hyped it the most though and repeatedly claimed throughout the day that there were 100,000 people expected for the rally.
CNN pointed to expected crowds as evidence of enthusiasm for Trump.
4/ Will leave it up to you to assess whether this is too much or too little pre-rally coverage. But, just remember that this coverage *before* the event. And whenever media talks about one thing, it means they aren't talking about something else (that may be more important).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ The right-wing noise machine has a disorienting effect.
Flooding the zone with lies, hate, conspiracies and intimidation. It distorts the conversation, tilts media narrative toward their nonsense, fosters fear and anxiety.
But recognize: this moment unlike any in decades…
2/ I am not sugar coating things. But, I also want to share some major considerations that many aren’t aware of. Considerations as to why this moment is so very unique.
3/ No 1 - recognize that this is the first presidential election in nearly 30 years where Rush Limbaugh is not the single largest get out the vote operation in the country.
The absence of Limbaugh is actually so much bigger than Limbaugh alone though.
2/ Project 2025 shutting down policy work isn't significant because: a) the bulk of the policy work is already done. The 900 page policy book is already written; and, b) the other 3 Project 2025 pilars remain in place -- especially the Playbook pilar.
3/ Project 2025 still plans on doing personnel work and still plans on doing the training work. Essentially, Project 2025 will still be the foundation of staffing a Trump admin should he get back into office.
1/ So this might partially help explain the delay: Last evening (4/16), Fox submitted a motion to the court. The motion asked the court to allow Fox to introduce as evidence that Donald Trump and others (Trump was the only one Fox named) made the same claims about others.
2/ A previous ruling said Fox wasn't really allowed to do this and they needed to keep focus on what they did. But, Fox is asking for the court to clarify and also approve this for 2 reasons (and this is kinda amusing)...
3/ First, basically to argue that because Trump was saying it, they had to cover it. I'm not sure they will prevail here. The judge has already said they don't get to use the neutral reportage defense and that's basically what this would be.
1/ There's something incredible in the background during this Dominion trial that is at least as significant (and possibly even more significant) as the trial itself for Fox News' bottom line.
My goodness is this a doozy...
2/ As the trial is happening, Fox News will be renegotiating or gearing up to renegotiate carriage renewal with 3 cable providers -- Xfinity, Chater and Cox.
It's hard to overstate how significant this and how potentially consequential this is for Fox News' future. Here's why...
3/ The dirty secret is that Fox News is the only commercial tv channel that actually doesn't need a single adl. They could have $0 in ad revenue and they'd still have more than a 35% profit margin.
That's cuz Fox is the 2nd most expensive channel on every cable bill (ESPN is #1)
1/ Judge issued ruling on the summary judgment motions in the Dominion v Fox News case.
Fox Corp and Fox News' motions for summary judgment to dismiss the case have been denied.
Domion's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.
Details to follow...
2/ In its partial ruling in favor of Dominion, the court did determine statements made by Fox were statements of fact and were not statements of opinion.
3/ The court ruled that Fox News is responsible for the claims made about Dominion; but, it left open the question for the jury as to whether Fox Corporation (Fox News' parent company) is responsible.