Not yet peer-reviewed but thank goodness for preprint
A few reflections
1. The randomization worked. The groups were pretty balanced
2. They pre-specified their subgroups. That's important
So the results?
Thread
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
2. Subgroups. Now it gets interesting! Tells us a lot about COVID19:
--No 02 support: Mortality looks higher for Dex
--02 only: Mortality 3.5% lower for Dex
--Ventilator: Mortality 11.7% lower for Dex!!
I can't find much wrong with approach or analysis but will see if others do
But this study hints at a bigger point about this disease
Key line from paper:
Beneficial effect...is dependent on using the right dose, at the right time, in the right patient
4/5
Later in disease course: Immune response may be the problem and drugs like Dexamethasone helpful
That means that if you take the drug too early, it may end up doing more harm than good
5/6
This is great. A fabulous study done under the most difficult of circumstances by @UniofOxford researchers within @NHSuk
Huge bow to the Recovery Trial investigators
Because we can't edit in twitter, a minor clarification.
The groups in this trial are pretty balanced.
But even if they weren't -- doesn't mean that randomization was flawed.