☀️ Profile picture
Jun 23, 2020 23 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Now that I have pointed these things out we'll now see the Vedic timeframe to understand Astrological dating.

P.S. - This is an open debate if anyone has input they can join in cause this field is full of uncertainty.

Let's see the units and timeframe by our Ved and Vedanta. Image
In Vedic frame:

Satya Yuga equals 1,728,000 Human years

Treta Yuga equals 1,296,000 Human years

Dvapara Yuga equals 864,000 Human years

Kali Yuga equals 432,000 Human years
Now these things shouldn't stop making sense in your head when I've already cleared how time (as dimension) changes after a certain interval of space-time relativity frame and also affected in 10 dimensional string oscillation of Universe.
Also that how a 14ft human of Treta Yug can reduce to just be a mere 5ft in Kaliyuga and why as the gravitational pull increased there is no one who can levitate in air for sometime or take high jumps enough to cross oceans.

According to Hawking, light isn't the fastest entity.
Though it was Sudarshan, Deshpande & Misra who were the first to propose the existence of particles faster than light, Tachyon.

Hawking estimated that 100 seconds after the Big Bang the universe had expanded to the size of our solar system. Is light the fastest entity, really?
Hawking's success came from how he challenged there are particles in Black hole and it evaporates. He even emphasized that if we master quantum mechanics and the M-string theory we would be able to time travel or change space-time

Now I need to put few more theories first here:
We know that Earth is getting smaller means the density overall is increasing. It doesn't change at the level of rocks but layers of Earth. It affects the rocks that's a different thing.

Now we'll see something from Einstein's wormhole theory to shed light on this further.
Einstein also told us that the force of gravity is a consequence of the way mass warps space and time. The more mass we squeeze into a region of space, the more spacetime is warped and the slower nearby clocks tick

However this doesn't be the same scenario with Volume & hence...
With density equations change further.

This gives us an idea that a shrinking earth & expanding universe increased time for one revolution.

Thats why in SatYuga they lived more years in same time. It was not they lived longer, their year ran faster than ours with same framework
Are you getting what I'm saying?

Time for:

Satya Yuga 1,728,000 years
=
Treta Yuga 1,296,000 years
=
Dvapara Yuga 864,000 years
=
Kali Yuga equals 432,000 years.

The framework of time didn't change here.
And it is not my saying, but Aryabhatta considered the four yugas as the four equal parts of the Chaturyuga (Yuga Cycle).

Another of our astronomer Paulisa believed the same.

Actually, the 4:3:2:1 was proposed by Brahmagupta but he didn't calculate relativity which they did.
All the calculations of Brahmans were in divine years of Brahma why? Because you know when you need to multiply any digit then you have to first convert them into same unit representation. You cannot multiply centimetres with kilometre and expect a final result now do you?
That is Chaturyuga of Brahma is equal to 12000 years and,

One day of Brahma = 12000 × 1000 i.e. 12 million years which followed by Night Of Brahma of equal duration becomes 24 million years.

The "eminent" scientists use this 12000 years to represent their 5000-7000BC theories.
So, now we know that during Ramayan times there was clear distinction or Manav and Vaanar. They were not considered the ancestors human but two different species.

Now the Vaanars weren't apes-

They could talk and perform rituals and their cranial capacity was more.
It is impossible to find the trace ancient men and Vanar in India because we never buried our dead.

Moreover there have been some incidences where Vaanar married Humans too supported by genetic studies, modern humans may have bred with "at least two groups" of ancient creatures.
This suit well with Archaic Humans description who are dated to 600,000 to 800,000 years ago and they went extinct about 11,000 years ago.

Point to note there were already very few Vaanar in Dvapar Yuga.

Dvapar Yuga ended about 5100~5200 years ago.
Now earlier I spoke of time being equal interval which changed w.r.t epoch.

So the events of Ramayan must have happened 4,40,000 years ago/or then Treta Yug came to end w.r.t. our epoch timeline.

For Dvapar Yuga the Ramayan must have happened about ~9 Lakh years ago.
Now how do we derive when Kaliyuga started?

It is derived from Aryabhatta's books.

Meaning: "When the three yugas Satya yuga, Treta yuga and Dwapara yuga) have elapsed and 60 x 60 (3,600) years of Kali yuga have already passed, I am now 23 years old". Image
Here Aryabhatta cannot be using Divine years of Brahma cause he said in comparison of his own age and to compare the digits we make sure that the units are of same comparable value.

See: Image
The problem with Nakshtra dating arise cause according to the old tradition, the first place was assigned to the nakshatra prevelant on the Vernal Equinox. Sage Vishwamitra modified it & started measuring from nakshatra at the Autumnal Equinox
(Aadiparva A.71 and Ashwamedha A.44)
And the people/researchers get intimidated by these big numbers and suggest the closest value of Nakshatra to be true like for Ramayan they say it happened 10000 years ago.

But they miss that the Nakshatra cycle repeat in every 25739 years.
AtharvaVeda gives two identifiable focuses here:

1. Beginning stage in Punarvasu
2. Advancement of Kritika Nakshatra (in Plaiedes star grouping) back to beginning stage. Image
This thread ain't conclude here if you're reading it now just know it'll be continued...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ☀️

☀️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HinduvaSenpai

Jul 10, 2020
This was said by Bhishma that women like to marry a warrior even if he falls instead of coward.

Now 72 Hoors:

"Verily for the Righteous there will be a fulfilment of (the heart's) desires; Gardens enclosed, and grapevines; And voluptuous women of equal age"

Qur'an 78:31-33"
The exact numbers are reported by Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal , Sunan al-Tirmidhi. ImageImage
Also in other Hadiths:

1) In Ibn Majah, Ibn `Adi in the Kamil, and al-Bayhaqi in al-Ba`th wal-Nushur

2) In Sifat al-Janna, al-`Uqayli in the Du`afa’, and Musnad of Abu Bakr al-Bazzar

3) In Musnad Ahmad ibn Hanbal ImageImageImage
Read 9 tweets
Jun 27, 2020
Fake Claim #23

VEDAS ARE UNSCIENTIFIC Part-I

This "pseudoscience" propaganda is so strong that writing such disrespectful articles in the country of Hindus is a new trend.

Dare they question "our brothers" about splitting of moon and how water become wine? ImageImage
I've encountered the verses they quote for propaganda too but some of it has already been taken earlier and most of it I wanna compile in a later thread which would just be an extension of non-sense cause instead of Vedas, in the name of it they quote Puranas.

Anyway, let's see
Rig Veda 1.38.7 says that;

"Cloud rains in those places where the atmosphere creates low Pressure."

We teach this in middle school but don't tell them where does this knowledge come from about factors of rain.

1/n Image
Read 67 tweets
Jun 12, 2020
Chapter 4:

Th Distortion of Vedas/Sanskrit by Max Müller and it's series of its consequences to this day on Hindu culture, religion and society

Now before his fanboys interrupt me let me make myself clear what kind of distortion I'm talking about

See this shall explain: ImageImageImageImage
Now before jumping into it I want to tell people few things about Müller, it's kind of an introduction from his own letters and a statistical information by John William Adamson.

A background check on Müller:

1/n Image
Now we'll see the letters of Müller taken from

“The Life and Letters of Friedrich Max Müller.”
First published in 1902 (London and N.Y.). Reprint in 1976 (USA).

1.  TO HIS WIFE, OXFORD, December 9, 1867

Here he expresses his desperation to uproot Hindu religion:

2/n Image
Read 37 tweets
May 25, 2020
Fake Claim #21

VEDAS ARE ANTI-WOMEN Part - II

The allegations are so dirty here like you can't discuss this things with anyone. How do they even think about his absurdity to fabricate. I'm disgusted to even write about it.

But let's debunk cause this filth has to be stopped
They fabricated YajurVeda 23.19:

"All wife of the host reciting 3 mantras go round the horse. While praying, they say: ‘O horse, you are, protector of the community on the basis of good qualities, you are, protector or treasure of happiness. O horse, you become my husband.'"
1/n
As we can see in Yajur Veda 23.19 there's no mention of wife or husband in the entire verse. The verses from Chapter 23 explain rituals related to ‘Ashwamedha Yagna’, which was performed by Emperors as a mark of showing superiority over other kingdoms.

2/n Image
Read 26 tweets
May 25, 2020
Fake Claim #22

VEDAS SAY HINDU GODS EAT BEEF

This is the most vulgar allegation so far and we don't need any outsider to forge fake theories when we have these so-called Hindus who can do to it 100x better for few dollars.

That's why I'm taking this before completing #21 ImageImage
In Vedas, carnality has been clearly prohibited. In many Vedic mantras, there is clearly prohibition of killing any creature and eating it, such as

Yajurveda 1.1:

"O man! Animals which are cow, they are never capable of violence."

1/n
Yajurveda 40.7
Those who know the relative soul of God as equal to their soul i.e. like their own interest, likewise in others

AtharvaVeda 8.6.23
Those people who eat raw & cooked meat available from the destruction of males & females, embryos & eggs, we should oppose them
2/n
Read 23 tweets
May 22, 2020
Fake Claim #11

Moon Runs On Water

Another day, another stupidity but what hurt me more is that one gentleman believed them and was like maybe that's what they believed thousands of years ago?

Sir, what they follow is believe system, what we follow is natural law

See yourself.
They cite Atharva Veda 18.4.89 transalated by Arya Samaj & alleged that as per this verse, moon runs on water

Here we can see Arya Samaj translation clearly has the word ‘अपने’ in bracket. The translation only says that Moon runs having it’s own (अपने) water in light of Sun

1/n Image
Though Arya Samaj translation clarified everything, I personally don’t consider this translation to be accurate here.

The best translation for Atharva Veda 18.4.89 is by ShriRam Sharma. So let’s read it:

See, the verse only says that Sun & Moon are running in Universe.

2/n Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(