I get the point...but am also dreading how many urbanists RTs this essay will get and how it will be wielded against BIPoC planning folks making more nuanced arguments latimes.com/opinion/story/…
Like, this only makes sense if you don't see freeway construction as part of a continuum.
I even had maps (!) showing how freeways had been used to wall communities off and contain populations once covenants were struck down!
But what made the physical boundaries so formidable was all of the other stuff that undermined their communities in the process. And, of course, policing.
Police had essentially been able to use the 10 as a boundary, containing the community for decades. When a young woman was shot in Westwood - evidence that that containment had failed - that's when the hammer came down.
And LAPD would play its role by terrorizing South Central residents, like with the infamous raid at 39th and Dalton
There's more, but the larger point (again, to urbanist folks) is that social/economic/cultural/racial landscapes are inextricably intertwined with the physical ones... they are not independent of each other.
Meaning that ripping a freeway out does not automatically qualify as anti-racist policy.
*ducks*
If you're not also engaging the legacy of disenfranchisement that those freeways helped deepen, then you have to ask what's been resolved.
Namely, law enforcement has been the ones deployed throughout history to police the mobility of Black and brown folks, whatever the built environment. They can and will continue to do that if a freeway gets ripped out.
But my larger point is that this is a moment where a wide range of folks are finally taking up questions of how race and racism shaped cities. And it's time for urbanism to go beyond the lens of the built environment to the deprivations and privileges built upon/embedded in it.
Anyways. Gonna post below some dives into how these things all intersect. First up: a deep dive into the history of South Central and how the quest to uphold white comfort north of the 10 meant aggressive repression of Nipsey's community. la.streetsblog.org/2019/08/15/nip…
A dive into the history of a corridor worst hit by the unrest of '92 and least recovered - and how a developer was able to hold the community hostage to blight for decades. la.streetsblog.org/2018/10/16/ver…
How disenfranchisement and generational trauma manifest on an individual level... the story of a friend who was struggling to stay housed. la.streetsblog.org/2018/09/07/as-…
The extent to which our planning processes do not allow for the contemplation of the costs disenfranchisement and disinvestment have imposed upon lower-income communities of color la.streetsblog.org/2016/11/22/wha…
And finally two on what it means when access to the public space is fraught because the streets are contested la.streetsblog.org/2013/11/06/dea…
Translating this for a planning audience: Youth in Watts describe the lengths they go to to feel safe in the streets la.streetsblog.org/2014/03/21/to-…
Finally, finally, the conversation we had with Richard Rothstein/The Color of Law and how we learned that, despite dedicating years to the study of segregation, he didn't see/understand the value of the concept of white privilege. la.streetsblog.org/2017/09/28/ame…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This (re the 110) is a bit oversimplified. The 110 was constructed as the Black pop. was experiencing rapid growth in South LA (which was still largely white then) and was spilling beyond the borders of redlined zones. It was more about containment/division than displacement. 1/
Where the East LA interchange was actively about "slum clearance" the 110 S. route was contentious b/c it was going to run thru white neighborhoods wherever it was put. Kenneth Hahn & protesters tried to push it much farther east to no avail. newspapers.com/image/68933525…
But the original Figueroa Pkwy plans had it running through the middle of S. LA. And the 110 rte had the added benefit of running alongside redlined zones and containing the rapidly growing Black population to the Eastside.
The LAPPL claims CM Soto-Martinez called for patrols to watch over his Lexus, but even Fox's own story has been corrected to note the CM doesn't own a Lexus & that it was a staffer who made the call about their personal vehicle. But why should police let facts get in the way...?
What about the hypocrisy of targeting someone for a public smear campaign when the evidence indicates they are not the guilty party? Just asking for the public...
On 1/18, Feezy filed a $10M tort claim vs. LASD for the NYE incident where dep. Justin Sabatine put a gun in his face & threatened to blow a hole in his chest. Audio of the threats quickly went viral. But the Sheriff did not respond for nearly a week 🧵: la.streetsblog.org/2023/02/03/any…
When they finally did, the statement was underwhelming, categorizing the threats to Feezy’s life as “unprofessional language” & the displaying/drawing of a weapon. It didn't mention the intimidation Feezy faced at the station or answer any ??s I asked.
LASD also released body cam footage of the incident. Though the detention lasted half an hour, the cam footage is just 4 min long, and only from Sabatine’s camera, which he did not turn on until a min. into the encounter, in violation of LASD policy.
Now @kdeleon is just making sh*t up. He didn't suggest @mhdcd8 take LAX from CD11 to expand the Black middle class there. He didn't want assets taken from CD9 b/c it would likely result in KDL/CD14 losing assets.
Tavis Smiley: My point is that you're not in the room...you're not voting on the issues that matter to your constituents. So when you say that your constituents will be left w/out a voice if you aren't there... You ain't there now.
LAPD's statement that they turned off 🚨/sirens to indicate "they would no longer be attempting to stop the vehicle" as they approached the intersection doesn't make a lot of sense. Nobody being pursued thinks, "phew!" while 🚓 is just 50ft behind you. latimes.com/california/sto…
Sirens are as much a signal to the person being pursued as an indicator to other road users to stop/slow down/move right/get outta the way. This is the moment the signal was turned off. They're both speeding & the first vehicle is probably 3-4 car lengths from the intersection.
Captured on a dashcam as the vehicle being pursued and LAPD speed toward them. LAPD has just turned off their lights in this image.
Saying the car part carried by Petit resembled a "nonfunctioning firearm" was bad enough, but it wasn't the only troubling assertion LAPD made at the hastily called "town hall" on the shooting the other night. la.streetsblog.org/2022/07/29/lap…
To justify the shooting, LAPD is working to anchor the narrative about the threat Petit allegedly posed in the 911 call. To do so, they took the highly unusual step of embedding a partial transcript in their official statement on the shooting. lapdonline.org/newsroom/offic…
I say "partial" b/c LAPD has also said that the caller followed Petit for some distance. That transcript is not included here, likely b/c it would contradict the intention of the excerpt above, which is to suggest Petit was brandishing a weapon/engaged in threatening behavior.