My Authors
Read all threads
A law regulating platform amplification of user content IS a law regulating speech. Smart people are wasting time having discussions that assume that problem away. 1/
You can’t escape First Amendment barriers (or international human rights law) just by shifting focus from “harmful content” to “the amplification of harmful content.” 2/
Most discussions I hear about this focus on making platforms demote / not amplify harmful content that is still, for better or worse, constitutionally protected speech. A law like that would have two First Amendment problems. 3/
First, an amplification law would mean the govt picks winners and losers among different users’ speech. Users can challenge that law and win. (Barring some serious communications regulation-like legal gymnastics, which is where attention will shift eventually.) 4/
Second an amplification law would dictate platforms’ editorial policy. Platforms can challenge that law and win. (Again, barring some major legal developments that would look a lot like old FCC cases.) 5/
I get why people want to talk about this. Platforms’ recommendation and ranking algorithms matter a ton. Wanting to change them, and pressuring platforms to change them *voluntarily*, is totally legit. (Though then we have to agree on the values and rules for that...) 6/
And there is an intuitive logic to saying “platforms aren’t responsible for what their users say, but they are responsible for what they choose to amplify.” 7/
But you still can’t pass laws regulating amplification if those laws are just a backhanded way of regulating legal speech. 8/
If the amplified content is actually *illegal* then we are in a different legal universe. Then the questions about what content platforms should demote look a lot like the current ones about what they should remove. 8/
If your position is that currently legal content *should* be illegal and we should change 1st Am jurisprudence, that is fine & intellectually coherent. But until that huge shift in law happens, there is no point tying that question to amplification or platform liability. 9/
One day I will write a paper saying all this in more detail. For now, thanks for bearing with my Twitter rants. 10/10
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Keep Current with Daphne Keller

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!