Thanks to my fellow IEMAC members, Chair @DallasBurtraw, Vice Chair Ann Carlson, Meredith Fowlie, Ross Brown, and our newest member, @TheKropke, for a great conversation. (Welcome, Jennifer!) 2/18
One of my priorities for this year is to better engage the public in the Committee's work advising on California's cap-and-trade program and other state climate policies. 3/18
To that end, we're working on a Committee handbook that will explain the process, including opportunities for written and oral public comments. Meanwhile, this thread will give a quick recap of today's meeting and the Committee's next steps. 4/18
Each year the IEMAC identifies a set of topics for 2-person subcommittees to work on in between public meetings. Each subcommittee develops material that is submitted for full Committee approval as a chapter in the IEMAC's annual report. 5/18
Today, we decided to form five subcommittees for the 2020 report: 6/18
(1) Transportation sector issues, including a special focus on ports and the broader movement of goods (not just people) (Ann Carlson and Jennifer Kropke). 7/18
(2) Cap-and-trade auction mechanics, including potential changes to the priority order in which allowances are sold in under-subscribed auctions (Meredith Fowlie and Ann Carlson). 8/18
(Auction mechanics are a favorite topic of mine, as my poor climate law and policy students know from their homework assignment last quarter.) 9/18
(3) An review of free allowance allocations provided to mitigate emissions leakage in the oil refining sector, as well as the impact of any potential changes to free allocation and program revenues on high-quality careers (Jennifer Kropke and Dallas Burtraw). 10/18
(4) Options for adjusting cap-and-trade allowance supplies and potential mechanisms for determining the need for action (Dallas Burtraw and me). 11/18
(5) The balance of cap-and-trade and regulatory measures in the upcoming 2022 Scoping Plan process, with an emphasis on trade-offs affecting affordability issues (Meredith Fowlie and me). 12/18
The IEMAC's non-voting member, Ross Brown, will also consult with individual subcommittees to provide input and feedback while maintaining the independence of his office, @LAO_CA. 13/18
(Please note that these descriptions reflect my personal notes—not a formal statement from the Committee—so they won't necessarily capture all the relevant nuances or final directions each subcommittee might take.) 14/18
For next steps, CalEPA staff will begin an effort to schedule our next virtual meeting, with a tentative target of August. When it's ready, the official meeting notice will be published here: 15/18
The IEMAC anticipates hosting at least two more virtual meetings this calendar year, with the final Committee report approved at the final meeting of the year. 16/18
In our meeting today, Chair Burtraw indicated that @AirResources plans to begin its public process for the 2022 Scoping Plan update in early 2021, which means that the 2020 IEMAC report will be complete in time to be considered in that process. 17/18
That's a wrap! Looking forward to working with the rest of the Committee and hearing from interested members of the public. 18/18
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Oh hey look it's another senior policymaker from the California Air Resources Board who jumped careers to work for a lobbying firm with oil industry clients.
Richard Corey was CARB's executive officer from 2013-2022. He was responsible for implementing the 2017 oil-industry-drafted cap-and-trade bill, AB 398. He's now the partner in charge of AJW's Carbon Markets practice. ajw-inc.com/carbon-markets/
During Corey's leadership oil won big on cap-and-trade, rolling back state and local regulations on the oil industry combined with a side deal to keep the state program swimming in bad offsets and surplus allowances, as @lisalsong wrote in Propublica. propublica.org/article/cap-an…
Governor Newsom is generating headlines for announcing an end to oil production in California, but as far as I can tell today's news only sets up a process rather than achieves any concrete outcomes.
First, the Governor has asked the director of CalGEM, which regulates oil production and issues drilling permits, to begin a regulatory process to ban new fracking permits by 2024.
2/ The book pulls together big ideas in a short, accessible package. David and I look at the global experience with carbon pricing — particularly carbon markets — and ask what’s gone wrong. We set out to explain why carbon pricing hasn’t been working, then offer solutions.
Thanks to @jtemple for including me in his story on the big news from Governor Newsom's new executive order, which sets a goal of 100% zero emission new car and truck sales by 2035.
I'll do a deeper dive on the legal situation below.
I'm cautiously optimistic that at least some companies will set a high bar and demand better outcomes than we see in the public sector.
(Other firms are looking to greenwash instead, as are some governments that fail to follow through on bold climate announcements.)
The problem is that the constituency for quality in climate policy is weak, so both public and private leaders can satisfy public demands with hollow pledges.
Opt-outs looked legally unnecessary in FERC orders after the SCOTUS opinion in FERC v. EPSA, and now with today's DC Cir decision in NARUC v. FERC there's a path open for FERC to close opt-outs in future rules concerning ISO/RTO access.
For FERC rules addressing something broader than ISO/RTO market access, however, there's not a lot to point to in today's decision. I expect to see a lot of debate over the implications in the months ahead.
In plain English:
Some states block demand response (DR) and distributed energy resources (DERs) from participating in FERC's wholesale electricity markets. But today's decision suggests FERC can require open access to its wholesale markets without any state-level opt-outs.