2/ That those Apollo flight computers were so basic, but flew to the Moon, isn't a measure of how primitive they were.
It's a measure of how ingenious the men & women at MIT were, who designed and programmed them.
3/ In just 5 or 6 years, the MIT engineers took computing power that required space equal to four full-size refrigerators, and shrank it down to 1 square foot — about the size of a brief case.
And that computer was better, by far, than the four-refrigerator version.
4/ This is #12 in the series of 50 stories I did last summer chronicling the race to the Moon in the 1960s, and its impact back here on Earth, @FastCompany.
5/ Apollo changed the course of computing—in the US & the world. Your iPhone can trace its lineage, & its usefulness, back to the computers the astronauts used to fly to the Moon.
The Apollo computer, by the way, had oversize keys so you could work it wearing spacesuit gloves.
6/ Last summer, '50 Days to the Moon,' was a celebration of the 50th anniversary of the 1st Moon landing.
This summer, those stories of how we got to the Moon are a reminder that ordinary people can do the extraordinary—if asked.
In the trade 'deal' with China, the US got nothing.
We're mostly back to where we were before the global trade war started—before Donald Trump started the global trade war.
The Chinese conceded nothing.
Indeed, from the outside, China won this round.
—>
2/ An economist from Hong Kong explains:
'From China’s perspective, the outcome of this meeting is a success, as China took a tough stance on the US threat of high tariffs & eventually managed to get the tariffs down significantly without making concessions.'
The chaos…
—>
3/ …The chaos for American business these last 5 weeks has been incredibly costly—financially, psychologically, in terms of planning, morale, a sense of predictability about the future.
You know how sometimes, you follow the weather & you know the blizzard is coming tomorrow morning, but today it's 39º & crystalline sunshine, & you can't quite believe the blizzard's coming?
But you can look at the radar and, yup, it's coming.
That's where we are now.
—>
2/ We know that in the next month, almost nothing is coming by ship to US from China & Chinese factories.
Ships full of merchandise, not coming.
The Port of Los Angeles/Long Beach has said cargo for the next couple weeks is down 36%.
Fascinating element of Harvard's refusal to buckle to the Trump Administration today.
Who are Harvard's lawyers in this matter?
#1 is Robert K. Hur.
Sound familiar? Trump named him US Attorney for Maryland.
—>
2/ Then Robert Hur was the special counsel who investigated Pres. Biden's mishandling of classified documents. Hur as the one who said Biden was 'an elderly man with a poor memory.' And declined to charge Biden.
That's Harvard lawyer #1.
—>
3/ Harvard lawyer #2 is William A. Burck.
Currently a member of the Board of Directors of Fox Corp., the owner of FoxNews.
Burck served as special counsel to the Republican House task force that investigated the attempted assassination of Pres. Trump.
Could Trump's tariffs spark a US factory & manufacturing renaissance?
Let's say they do.
Here's the problem, even if we double the number of factories the US has now. Even if we—somehow—start making microwave ovens and pleated-front chinos and pillow cases in the US again.
—>
2/ There won't be many jobs.
Factory automation for routine, repetitive manufacturing is very far along.
It's so widespread that there's a phrase in the manufacturing world:
'Lights-out factories.'
…Factories with so few people, they keep the lights off.
—>
3/ Machines don't need lights. So many big companies—including consumer products companies like Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Foxconn—run factories with just a scattering of staff who monitor the machines.
Like in a quiet office, the lights only come on when a person walks in.