🆕 Fresh analysis! 🙌 West Ham secured a vital victory over Chelsea, to the relief of the visitors’ top-four rivals. Our professional coaches assess what unfolded 👇
After starting with a 4-2-3-1 formation, West Ham reorganised into a more defensive 4-1-4-1 in which their wide players were forced to track Chelsea’s adventurous full-backs #WHUCHE
David Moyes’ team sought to attack on the counter during the first half by encouraging Michail Antonio, supported by a teammate, to drift into the spaces behind Chelsea’s full-backs #WHUCHE
Jarrod Bowen’s desire to remain in an attacking position, and the willingness of Chelsea’s defenders to advance, meant that West Ham often had the numbers to transitions into Chelsea’s half #WHUCHE
Bowen’s positioning also meant Ryan Fredericks prioritising Marcos Alonso, and the dangerous Christian Pulisic being left to attack the hosts’ central defenders #WHUCHE
Chelsea, organised into a 4-3-3, adapted to West Ham’s deepening defensive block with the width provided by Willian and Alonso, and the positioning of Mateo Kovacic #WHUCHE
During the rarer periods they were forced to defend from a deep position, Chelsea’s attacking structure became a 4-2-3-1, from what had been their starting 4-3-3 #WHUCHE
A lack of defensive balance demonstrated by Chelsea invited West Ham to attack them on the counter, but N’Golo Kanté largely addressed that imbalance #WHUCHE
Kanté’s influence grew when he became the pivot at the base of Chelsea’s midfield, inviting them to commit increased numbers to their attacks #WHUCHE
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Manchester City’s 4-3-3 started on the front foot as Arsenal initially attempted to press into the host’s half, in a 4-4-2 shape. Arsenal went player-oriented in the wide areas, with Declan Rice and Thomas Partey tracking Bernardo Silva and Ilkay Gündogan’s forward runs. However, Silva’s wide runs to City’s right-side created space for Savinho to drive inside, penetrating against the aggressive jumping of Arsenal’s left-back, Calafiori. This helped disrupt and stretch Arsenal’s back line in the early stages, including when Haaland was slid in-behind to calmly open the scoring... 🧐🧵
It wasn’t long before Arsenal formed a low block, while City responded with a 3-1-5-1 shape. Josko Gvardiol moved into a left-side number eight role from full-back, with Gündogan as the central option underneath Haaland. Rodri – soon to be replaced by Kovacic – acted as the single pivot. Still, it was City’s right side that proved most potent, with Silva’s wider positioning supporting Savinho’s direct movements and dribbles against Calafiori... 🧐🧵
Stemming from tweaks to the 4-4-2 formation, and initially most popular in Spain, the 4-2-3-1 grew in popularity from the 2000s onwards. It has since been used with success by many prominent coaches, including Pep Guardiola, Arne Slot and Erik ten Hag... 4️⃣2️⃣3️⃣1️⃣🧵
Central protection...
The 4-2-3-1 requires defensive midfielders who can duel, tackle and intercept in individual battles. These midfielders must be alert enough to land on any second balls. They must have good acceleration and deceleration to help with this... 4️⃣2️⃣3️⃣1️⃣🧵
Spain used a 4-3-3 structure and built play patiently from the back, despite Germany pressing aggressively from their 4-2-3-1. They moved the ball around the back line to isolate Thomas Müller, before a centre-back stepped out with the ball into midfield... 🧐🧵
Olmo continued to move inside and Asensio dropped deep, in the process pulling Süle out of his position in Germany’s back line. This helped Spain to build out from the back and get around Germany’s increasingly effective high press... 🧐🧵
Traditionally, full-backs are the widest players in a back four, and as a result they attack and defend mostly in the wide areas. However, full-backs who move inside into central spaces are known as ‘inverted full-backs’. This movement adds an extra presence centrally... ↩️🧐
Although Pep Guardiola is the coach most associated with the inverted full-back, Johan Cruyff used them with Barcelona many years before. Then, he often converted the 4-3-3 into a 3-4-3 diamond, with one full-back inverting into central midfield... ↩️🧐
Manchester United were set up in a 4-2-3-1 shape, but Fred pushed forward from the double pivot to become a number 8 and give them a stronger attacking presence in central midfield. Bruno Fernandes then adapted his positioning, moving into the left inside channel... 🧐🧵
The hosts eventually pushed both full-backs higher, primarily working around the outside of Tottenham’s wing-backs. United’s wingers then came inside, with the freedom to rotate with Fred and Fernandes, as long as both inside channels were always occupied... 🧐🧵