Just to clear this one up, as it's very confusing for obvious reasons.
When the VAR checks for offside, he will always first see if the player is in an offside position.
Matic is offside. But in this case the VAR, Lee Mason, must then decide if he is interfering. 1/3 #MUNBOU
When the VAR checks for offside, he will always first see if the player is in an offside position.
Matic is offside. But in this case the VAR, Lee Mason, must then decide if he is interfering. 1/3 #MUNBOU
Lee Mason came to the conclusion that Matic was not in the line of vision of goalkeeper Aaron Ramsdale.
This is obviously subjective, so I'm sure many will feel the goal should have been disallowed.
Matic was in an offside position but deemed not to be interfering.
2/3
This is obviously subjective, so I'm sure many will feel the goal should have been disallowed.
Matic was in an offside position but deemed not to be interfering.
2/3
On the image being on TV - and I've tried to explain this a few times when people ask "why weren't the lines shown."
Choice of which VAR images are used is are solely down to the broadcaster.
Obviously, this image came without context and understandably led to confusion. 3/3
Choice of which VAR images are used is are solely down to the broadcaster.
Obviously, this image came without context and understandably led to confusion. 3/3
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
