Greg Leiserson Profile picture
Jul 6, 2020 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
.@equitablegrowth last week: The coronavirus recession highlights the importance of automatic stabilizers 1/ equitablegrowth.org/the-coronaviru…
A recession is a broad-based decline in economic activity across the country. 2/ Image
Economic suffering is generally a result of the depressed level of economic activity, not the rate of change, and continues long after the official recession ends. 3/ Image
Defining recessions in terms of aggregate economic indicators obscures disparate experiences for different populations. 4/
The Great Recession formally ended in June 2009, but the unemployment rate for White workers peaked in October 2009, the unemployment rate for Black workers peaked in March 2010, and the unemployment rate for women peaked even later. 5/
The policy response to a recession can provide direct relief, moderate the decline in economic activity, and accelerate the recovery. 6/
Importantly, our focus in providing this relief should be on well-being or living standards, not economic activity itself. Public policies can increase living standards even as they reduce economic activity. These types of policies are highly desirable! 7/
The coronavirus recession shares many similarities with previous recessions but is also different in some key ways. First, this recession occurred with unprecedented speed due to the sudden emergence and spread of the novel coronavirus. 8/
Second, the virus has made economic activity more dangerous. Third, because the recession was caused by a virus, the decline in economic activity has occurred alongside an increase in morbidity and mortality. 9/
Nobody knows for sure how long the coronavirus recession will last or exactly how severe it will be. The uncertainty that would exist when confronting any recession is compounded by the uncertainty about the nature and consequences of the coronavirus itself. 10/
Automatic stabilizers support household incomes and spending during recessions. Crucially, they also continue as long as they are needed. If the recession is deeper and longer, then the response grows. If the recovery is quicker, then the response shrinks. 11/
Congress should expand and improve automatic stabilizers to address the coronavirus recession. For more see #RecessionReady from @equitablegrowth and @hamiltonproj. 12/12 equitablegrowth.org/recession-read…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Leiserson

Greg Leiserson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gregleiserson

Sep 30, 2020
New report: Cost-benefit analysis of U.S. tax regulations has failed. What should come next? 1/ equitablegrowth.org/research-paper…
Also available in convenient summary version: Why cost-benefit analysis of tax regulations has failed, and how to fix it 2/ equitablegrowth.org/why-cost-benef…
In April 2018, while the Treasury and the IRS were developing regulations to implement the TCJA, the Trump administration sharply expanded a requirement for cost-benefit analysis of tax regulations 3/
Read 11 tweets
Jun 9, 2020
New WP: Distribution Analysis as Welfare Analysis equitablegrowth.org/working-papers… 1/
This paper formalizes fixed-quantities distribution analysis as the primary ingredient in the welfare (and cost-benefit) analysis of tax changes. The fixed-quantities change in tax is the change in tax ignoring changes in quantities but including changes in prices. 2/
Growth, which is a change in quantities, should generally be ignored in the welfare analysis. However, it does matter for estimating fiscal effects. 3/
Read 20 tweets
Jan 28, 2020
NEW: Taxing Wealth, my contribution to the @hamiltonproj volume Tackling the Tax Code: Efficient and Equitable Ways to Raise Revenue 1/ equitablegrowth.org/taxing-wealth/
The income tax does a poor job of taxing the income from wealth. Investment gains are taxed only when assets are sold. Gains on assets that are never sold during a taxpayer’s lifetime are wiped out for income tax purposes at death. 2/
The opportunity to choose when and even whether to pay tax on investment gains leads to widespread tax avoidance. Moreover, even when gains are taxed, they are taxed at preferential rates. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Jan 6, 2020
Ok, pausing my twitter hiatus because @RichardRubinDC is posing questions that are at the very center of my work: if TCJA yielded a modest boost in the capital stock would that be enough to make it worth it? 1/
This is a (partially) answerable question but you must acknowledge that the purpose of tax cuts is to cut taxes, something our economic policy discourse largely refuses to do so. (I have thoughts on why, but we’ll save those for another time.) 2/
The tax system is a means of effectuating transfers from the public to the government. Tax increases impose burden on people to raise revenues. Tax cuts reduce burden at the expense of revenues. 3/
Read 20 tweets
Oct 9, 2019
For @AEI’s #TCJANowWhat: A regressive, deficit-financed tax cut is not what the United States needed 1/ aei.org/economics/a-re…
Tax economists will spend lots of time in the coming years studying TCJA’s impacts, but its policy merits depend far less on the precise results of these studies than on the basic fact that it was a regressive, trillion-dollar tax cut 2/
Was delivering tax cuts to the relatively well-off the best use of the $1–$2 trillion legislators devoted to the TCJA, or were there other more pressing needs? 3/
Read 13 tweets
Mar 21, 2019
New from @equitablegrowth: “Net worth taxes: what they are and how they work” provides the background you need to understand wealth taxes. Some highlights: equitablegrowth.org/research-paper…
The wealthiest 1 percent of U.S. households own about 40 percent of all wealth according to the Survey of Consumer Finances
Wealth inequality has been increasing in recent decades
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(