Fake News de @ElNuevoDia: El enmarque de este fallo del Supremo es perverso, ya que no se trata de "denegar la libertad de voto", sino de impedir que se trastoque el proceso constitucional del Colegio Electoral. bit.ly/31QzccY
En elecciones presidenciales, el voto por un candidato(a) presidencial significa un voto por la plancha de electores que acuden al Colegio Electoral. Esa plancha de electores está obligada a votar por quien gane el voto popular en su estado.
Lo que el fallo de hoy faculta es que los estados sancionen a quienes violan su compromiso como electores.
Quien quiera enmendar o derogar el Colegio Electoral tiene que buscarse 38 estados que ratifiquen tal enmienda constitucional y punto.
Otra cosa que se quedó fuera de la nota: El fallo fue UNANIME.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
With the notable exception of Telemundo, corporate media’s coverage of the horrendous Ohio child rape case largely casts the activist abortion provider as its true victim- rather than the child whose innocence was shattered.
Where is FCCS? Has this child been removed from the home? Is there a dependency case attached to the capital sexual battery?
Why did it take two weeks for the child to be in a situation where she could identify her rapist to law enforcement? Why was she endangered for two weeks after the rape was initially reported?
WATCH: The mother of the Ohio 10/y rape victim tells Telemundo's @MariaVargasPion that the child "is fine", and "everything they say about (Gerson Flores) is a lie."
This portion of a broader interview sheds significant light on the familial dynamics of this case, and further vindicates all skepticism over how the story broke and was handled. We don't even get to this point without the critical work of @MeganFoxWriter and so many others.
This appears to confirm my thesis of a domestic situation wherein the confessed rapist is also the paramour of the victim's mother (other familial relation is possible but less likely). Unfortunately, I saw many such cases while working as a court interpreter.
Some were expecting the Hispanic shift to the GOP to stall after the 2020 presidential election. Trump hitting 38% of Hispanics nationally was seen as a reversion to historical average after Romney's disastrous 27% in 2012. But the opposite has happened.
Why was GOP support among Hispanics so low in the past? In large part, because the GOP relied on the representations of left-wing groups (such as the National Council of La Raza) that immigration is the paramount issue for the recently-created Latino identity.