Ok, some tweets on the Leicester goal, the offside, the technology and the camera angle. #ARSLEI
The frame is selected which shows the first point of contact on the pass by Gray.
Once this frame is "locked in," the same frame can be cross-checked on other angles.
That enables the VAR, Stuart Attwell, to check the position of players from other camera angles at that same point of play.
So the VAR was able to tell from this angle that the Arsenal defender was playing Vardy onside with his stretched leg.
However, it is important for the main VAR image to show the point the ball is being kicked for transparency.
This can offer a misleading camera angle, as was the case here. The perspective here gives the impression Vardy is further forward relative to the defender.
This changes at the point Ayoze Perez (who was onside) attempts to play the ball, as any touch would have created a new phase and made Vardy offside (he may look level with the ball on this camera angle).
So the only question now is does Perez touch the ball. And if anyone can categorically say he did you have better eyesight than I do.
In addition, Chris Kavanagh got a lot of misplaced praise for using the monitor on the Nketiah red.
1. He now has to. 2. In the PL this is merely a confirmatory process when the VAR decides it's a sure red. 3. So you won't see the ref use the montior on, say, Vardy-Mustafi.
VAR red cards this season have been:
1 professional foul
1 handball on the goalline
6 serious foul play tackles
There has been no VAR red for any kind of "stray" arm or boot that caught an opposition player.
If the referee tells the VAR he saw Vardy's boot accidentally catch Mustafi as both players fell to the ground, and there was no intent, you won't see a red.
The ref only uses the monitor on definite reds *in the opinion of the VAR*. Won't be a review for a "possible red".
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Sick of keepers holding the ball for 30-40 seconds to waste time or slow down play?
The [unenforced] law says a keeper can only hold the ball for 6 seconds. Any longer and it's an indirect FK to the opposition.
We now have details of The IFAB trial to change it.
Thread. 👇
As well as wasting time, a goalkeeper holding the ball for too long is considered an unfair tactic because the opposing team has no possibility to regain possession.
That's because a goalkeeper cannot be challenged when in control of the ball with the hand(s).
A keeper holding the ball for more than 6 seconds should be punishable by an indirect free kick.
However, we have got to the stage where this is rarely enforced by referees, which in recent years has been exploited tactically.
Mauro Icardi's offside in Galatasaray vs. Manchester United gives us a good illustration of how semi-automated technology will be more accurate and reliable - yet may lead to more goals being disallowed.
This was ruled out on the field, but stay with me.
There's a common misconception that handball starts at the bottom of the sleeve.
This isn't the case.
It's the arm point level with the armpit - if you had it by your side - around the whole arm.
Basically, the area of the arm which can't increase body size if you move it.
The starting point for offside (and handball) is therefore an imaginary line on the arm.
With the old tech, the point on the attacker and defender is plotted manually by the VAR and operator.
This obviously has to cause inconsistencies, and it's why there's a tolerance level.
This is what happened with the Luis Diaz "goal" which Liverpool had disallowed vs. Tottenham.
There will be a deeper dive in the Monday VAR thread, but in simple terms the VAR took the wrong onfield decision - it led to the goal being disallowed.
So the VAR, Darren England, checked offside thinking the onfield decision was "goal."
It was a quick offside check because it was clear Diaz was onside, so he told the referee "check complete".
In telling the ref "check complete" he is saying the onfield decision was correct.
So the "human error" by the VAR team is getting the onfield decision wrong. Not by failing to draw lines etc.
The lines were drawn and Diaz was clearly onside.
The huge, quite unbelievable error was misunderstanding the onfield decision.
So the dust has settled on the first VAR audio show of the year with Howard Webb.
Time for a little old-school VAR thread to go through it.
I'll include the video clips.
We got 2 of the 3 big errors in the Premier League this season - the penalty not given against Andre Onana vs. Wolves + the offside goal Man City scored against Fulham.
It didn't include Alexis Mac Allister's red card, which has been the main point of complaint in my comments.
It would have been better to include that Mac Allister red, especially as it was overturned on appeal.
But then if you include Mac Allister, you drop something else (Zaroury?). And you absolutely have to include the examples of good process to show where VAR works.
Getting lots of comments about Lee Mason's return to PGMOL, and they're fair. I'm surprised too.
But he isn't working in the Premier League, he will be a coach in League One and League Two.
PGMOL is reducing the ratio of coaches to referees, so a lot of roles have been created.
Bottom line is everyone who is appointed as a coach is going to be a former ref, and Lee Mason was obviously vastly experienced.
I've no idea if he will be good as a coach, after a pretty dismal end to his career on the pitch and in the VAR room, but understand the reaction.
Howard Webb said: "We're going to be ensuring that [Lee Mason] is exposed to all the upskilling that our professional coach workforce needs. He went through a pretty thorough assessment process alongside others that have come in as well into this enhanced coaching group.
FIFA publishes the top 10 international player transfers by total transfer fee in 2022.
Includes:
Luis Diaz, Darwin Nunez to Liverpool
Antony, Casemiro to Man United
Erling Haaland to Man City
Alexander Isak to Newcastle
Raphinha to Barcelona
(list is not in fee order)
The domination of English football in the transfer market laid bare.
The top 5 country-to-country transfer routes are all to England.
France to England the most lucrative market in 2022.
Man United the biggest spenders on transfer fees in the world in 2022.
Of the top 10, 7 are Premier League clubs.
Leeds 10th.
Nottingham Forest 14th.
Everton 15th.
Chelsea (16th) might be a bit higher next year.....