"Cancel culture" is being used to describe everything from people disapproving of pedophiles to celebrities being criticised on social media.
It's become a means to protect the powerful and wealthy from being scrutinised for things they say or do.
A lot of what's called "the culture war" is just younger people trying to assert their different social and moral values over older generations who run most of the media.
A lot of older media types genuinely fear younger people as woke barbarians banging at their gates.
The essential truth of modern political debate is that younger people and older people now live on different planets. That's unprecedented: both Thatcher and Reagan won the youth vote.
My politics are based on class: this divide doesn't make me comfortable. But it's just a fact.
According to @IpsosMORI, in the 1983 Tory landslide, 42% of under-25s voted Tory, compared to 33% for Labour.
In the 2019 Tory landslide, 62% of under-25s voted Labour compared to 19% who voted Tory.
You can't understand modern political and cultural debate without those facts.
For those asking for the full debate about "cancel culture" with Toby Young, here you go!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gaza genocide deniers like @DavidHirsh should explain, clearly and plainly:
Why have pre-eminent scholars - including in Israel - who dedicate their lives to studying genocide and indeed the Holocaust independently concluded that Israel has committed genocide?
How could academics specialising in the study of genocide get such an unbelievably extreme conclusion so wrong?
If indeed all these genocide scholars have somehow got this wrong, would they not have arrived at this conclusion on the basis of unbelievably damning evidence?
Political journalism isn’t about allowing voters to make informed decisions, thus enhancing democracy.
It’s about setting and policing the parameters of political debate - determining everything from what’s considered extreme, to what’s considered scandalous.
In practise, most British political journalism reduces politics to a character driven Westminster soap opera, based on who is up or down.
But this is itself highly ideological, because it’s based on embedding what’s seen as “serious” and politically acceptable.