Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
ScienceVet Profile picture
@ScienceVet2
Jul 14, 2020 • 6 tweets • 2 min read • Read on X
So yesterday I talked about testicles and COVID-19. Opinions on ovaries are a little more mixed but...

TLDR: Ovaries probably have enough of the same receptors that if testicles are affected, so can ovaries be. So, if you have any interest in protecting your organs, wear a mask
ACE2 is expressed pretty widely through uterus/ovaries/placenta. ACE2 is the primary access point for the SARS-CoV-2 virus

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32365180/
ACE2 isn't largely co-expressed with TMPRSS2 in reproductive tissues, which should make them less vulnerable. But this holds true for testicles too, and that doesn't protect them. No reason to think it would protect ovaries or uteri.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32622411/
Effect on gametogenesis (making eggs) is unknown. Infected pregnant parents are prone to preterm delivery, regardless of severity. This implies some interruption of the reproductive system.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32482250/
SARS-CoV-2 does not seem to be found in the lower portions of the genital tract (vagina/cervix)

ajog.org/article/S0002-…
ACE2 is expressed especially highly in the uterus during decidualization (preparing for egg implanting). This may make those cells susceptible to infection. But those infected cells may be promptly flushed if infection prevents implantation and pregnancy pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32607509/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with ScienceVet

ScienceVet Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ScienceVet2

ScienceVet Profile picture
Jul 20, 2020
"More people die of the flu every year, you're just fear mongering"

No, more than 140k Americans do NOT die from flu a year. No matter how you calculate them.

2017-18 was the worst recent year and the CALCULATED deaths are still only around 61k tops.
(61k is less than 140k in case you were wondering).

And those are the CALCULATED deaths for a YEAR. That's the number that we come to using the numbers of confirmed deaths, the number of total deaths, and a bunch of math after the season is over.
We figure out how many of those total deaths were almost definitely actually flu. For comparison, the CONFIRMED deaths for flu in an average year is 2-3k. Yes, 2-3 thousand. Again, far less than the 143,000 confirmed COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. in six months.
Read 13 tweets
ScienceVet Profile picture
Jul 13, 2020
Need another reason to wear a mask, socially distance, and stay safe?

SARS-CoV-2 gets into cells mostly via the ACE2 receptor. Know what tissue has a lot of ACE2 receptor (besides lungs, gut, heart, etc)?

TESTICLES.
Especially a worry for those young people who "aren't affected as badly" by COVID-19, because you might not be breathing hard, but your dangly bits might be getting permanently toasted.

Don't want your spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis screwed with? Stay home and mask up.
"The main host receptor of the SARS-CoV-2 is angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a major component of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). The ACE2 is also involved in testicular male regulation of steroidogenesis and spermatogenesis." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Read 6 tweets
ScienceVet Profile picture
Jul 11, 2020
The "readability survey" on @ravelry is inaccessible as hell, and fails to address many of the primary concerns with the layout.

It's also incredibly ineffectively written if you actually want usable, useful data out. @outcassed and @ravelry , hire an accessibility consultant!
Seriously, 35 pages and nothing on the flickering drop shadows besides a ticky box asking if you use the setting?
"Which do you prefer?"

I prefer not having to lie down after 5 minutes of using @ravelry, or after spending 5 minutes flicking between survey options.
Read 5 tweets
ScienceVet Profile picture
Jul 10, 2020
61,067 new cases of COVID-19 yesterday in the US

State: New Infections (% of new) - (% of tot US Pop)
TX: 11,394 (19%) - (9% of US Pop)
FL: 8,935 (15%) - (6% of US Pop)
CA: 7,248 (12%) - (12% of US Pop)
AZ: 4,057 (7%) - (2% of US Pop)
GA: 2,837 (5%) - (1% of US Pop)
TX Image
FL Image
Read 5 tweets
ScienceVet Profile picture
Jul 10, 2020
So let's say you have pneumonia. It's not looking so hot.

Then you get terminal cancer. You've got a week to live.

Suddenly someone comes in and stabs you in the chest with a knife.

What do you want marked as the cause of death?

That's right: Bleeding from knife wound
Lucky for you, this is how it works! (mostly)

If you're dyING of something, but something else comes in, takes advantage of that, and kills you (you can't fight back against knife guy because of cancer and pneumonia) it's still the knife that killed you.
My dad has heart disease and diabetes. If someone breaks into his house and kneels on his chest until he dies...

The cause of death is lack of air caused by chest compression, even if his conditions make that easier.
Read 10 tweets
ScienceVet Profile picture
Jun 18, 2020
Another vaccine trial. It will be interesting to see where this goes, and I approve of the lead's comment.

theguardian.com/world/2020/jun…
This quote is good context from the lead. "Is that protection against infection? Is it protection against illness? Is it protection against severe disease? It’s quite possible a vaccine that only protects against severe disease would be very useful.”
An ideal vaccine produces sterilizing immunity, and keeps the virus from ever replicating. But less ideal vaccines are still very useful. A vaccine that kills an extant infection, for instance. Or a vaccine that attenuates infection so symptoms are milder.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(