2/ It was the era when you looked to newspapers the day after big events for spectacular coverage.
That's when they could capture the event in photos, could write stories, could unleash those 8-column headlines.
Here's the NYT front page the day after the launch.
3/ Couple fun things happened the Wednesday of the launch (in addition to the flawless launch itself):
Pres. Nixon called for a national holiday the following Monday (July 21), so everyone could stay up late the day of the Moon walk without worrying about work & school.
4/ The holiday idea got a little traction, but not much.
That day after the launch, in addition to the big 1A coverage of Apollo 11, the NYT produced a whole separate 20-page section.
'Man and the Moon.'
Opening page below.
5/ The NYT special section was an astonishing, bravura New York Times performance.
A dozen pieces & essays, many by NASA officials writing about what they were in charge of.
• Wernher Von Braun on rockets
• Sam Phillips, Apollo program director, on project management
6/ And more…
• Thomas Paine, head of NASA, on the prospect for nuclear-powered rockets making routine roundtrips to the Moon
• Chris Kraft, head of mission control, on Apollo's computers
• Rocco Petrone, head of Cape Kennedy, on the 5 months of prep for a single launch
7/ Plus…
Isaac Asmiov
Arthur C. Clarke
Robert Jastrow
…and stories by the NYT space reporters on the astronauts, the lunar module, & the 50,000-foot flight from lunar orbit to Moon landing.
The section would take a day to ready thoroughly.
And: a couple cool full-page ads.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Fascinating element of Harvard's refusal to buckle to the Trump Administration today.
Who are Harvard's lawyers in this matter?
#1 is Robert K. Hur.
Sound familiar? Trump named him US Attorney for Maryland.
—>
2/ Then Robert Hur was the special counsel who investigated Pres. Biden's mishandling of classified documents. Hur as the one who said Biden was 'an elderly man with a poor memory.' And declined to charge Biden.
That's Harvard lawyer #1.
—>
3/ Harvard lawyer #2 is William A. Burck.
Currently a member of the Board of Directors of Fox Corp., the owner of FoxNews.
Burck served as special counsel to the Republican House task force that investigated the attempted assassination of Pres. Trump.
Could Trump's tariffs spark a US factory & manufacturing renaissance?
Let's say they do.
Here's the problem, even if we double the number of factories the US has now. Even if we—somehow—start making microwave ovens and pleated-front chinos and pillow cases in the US again.
—>
2/ There won't be many jobs.
Factory automation for routine, repetitive manufacturing is very far along.
It's so widespread that there's a phrase in the manufacturing world:
'Lights-out factories.'
…Factories with so few people, they keep the lights off.
—>
3/ Machines don't need lights. So many big companies—including consumer products companies like Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Foxconn—run factories with just a scattering of staff who monitor the machines.
Like in a quiet office, the lights only come on when a person walks in.
Here's the thing that might happen with Trump's tariffs.
It's not 1893. It's not 1933.
We—the United States—have spent 50 years creating a web of global trade, an interwoven global economy.
Now, Trump is using garden shears to cut the US out of that network.
—>
2/ We've been the indispensable trade partner—the US is 26% of global GDP, and a great place to sell your stuff. We have well-off consumers with plenty of disposable income.
But if Trump is unbending, the world could simply comply—and trade among themselves.
—>
3/ We are 26% of the global market. But that means 74% of the global market is out there without us.
Including all of the EU, whose unified economy is almost the size of the US, with similar consumers. And the Chinese economy.
On the bridge of the container ship Dali, 4 minutes from disaster, there's one critical moment we haven't heard about yet.
The very moment the ship lost power the 1st time.
What did the pilot do, right then?
His first thought, apparently, was safety — the bridge looming ahead.
—>
⤵️ NTSB photo of the bridge of the Dali...
2/ The 1st 'event' leading up to the collision that the NTSB notes in its timeline is 1:24:59—when alarms on the bridge indicate power failure.
The ship was without electricity, engine power, lights, navigation, radio.
Dali was dark, literally & in terms of communications.
—>
3/ The first thing the pilot did — apparently within the first 30 to 60 seconds of the ship going dark — was take out his cell phone and call harbor pilot dispatch.
He told his dispatcher: We've lost power, close the bridge. Close the bridge.