Although I did not watch the #SHEAR2020 plenary live, my Twitter feed alerted me to a vibrant discussion about it.
I did watch parts of it until it was taken down.
There are a lot of questions to be answered. Let me raise a few that haven't been so extensively discussed.
Whether or not one wants to classify Andrew Jackson as a military hero, there is little doubt that his exploits in uniform against Native Americans, the British at New Orleans, and his invasion of Florida gave him a high profile.
There were other military notables: Winfield Scott and Oliver Hazard Perry ... and Old Tippicanoe himself, William Henry Harrison and ichard M. Johnson. In the case of Jackson, Harrison, and Johnson, a large part of that reputation was made fighting indigenous peoples.
So it's interesting to think about what made someone a "hero" at this time.
Dan Feller (the "hero" of the hour, according to much commentary about #SHEAR2020), strenuously objected to the use of the word "slaughtered" regarding the Battle of New Orleans. He seemed to think it implied some sort of war crime, whereas Jackson was just doing his job.
I remember thinking that this seemed to make a great deal out of very little and was perhaps a little too defensive, but that Feller was showing us that he was well aware of the implications of words people used.
In light of other events at the plenary, that was ironic.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Time and again critics of Ulysses S. Grant's generalship claim that, above all else, he was "Grant the Butcher," who prevailed because of his superiority in resources (which was seemingly endless) despite a certain mindlessness and dullness.
Grant's supporters counter this charge largely in a statistical fashion. They compare the percentage of Grant's losses versus the percentage of losses suffered by other generals, including Robert E. Lee.
Sometimes these analyses focus on the 1864 Overland Campaign, which in the minds of some people is the only campaign Grant ever fought ... the claims of butcher rely mostly on May-June 1864.
Today's the 160th anniversary of one of the most misunderstood battles of the American Civil War ... Cold Harbor.
The story of the battle has turned into a myth that in turn has long shaped the image of Ulysses S. Grant's generalship.
Make no mistake about it ... Cold Harbor was a significant setback for Grant and US forces during the Overland Campaign. Several US commanders performed poorly that day, especially in not carrying out George G. Meade's orders to reconnoiter the Confederate position.
However, we now know that tales of 7,000 men falling in less than an hour are false. We also know that the quest for a ceasefire to recover wounded and dead between the lines was botched by two prideful commanders.
It's often asserted the as president Ulysses S. Grant destroyed the Ku Klux Klan.
The reality is not nearly as satisfying or uplifting to those who deplore white supremacist paramilitary terrorism as conducted primarily by veterans of the Confederate war effort.
The KKK became a shorthand descriptor for the many forms of white supremacist terrorism that slowly took organized form in the late 1860s. There were other massacres (Memphis) and attacks (New Orleans) against blacks and their white allies in the Reconstructing South.
By 1867 and 1868, when Black men in large numbers exercised the right to vote for the first time, white supremacist terrorism, often defined as KKK activity, targeted Black voters and Republican officeholders.
Visual portrayals of what happened in Wilmer McLean's parlor on April 9, 1865, at Appomattox Court House are worth some study.
Here's a simple early version: two generals, one table.
The table is a curious effort to bring together elements of the two tables involved in the event. Grant said at a brown wood oval table; Lee sat at a squarish marble table. Grant's chair was a swivel desk chair backed in leather, while Lee sat in a high-backed chair.
Yet it took a while for artists to include those four pieces of furniture, let alone to assign them to the general who used them.
As true Americans commemorate the anniversary of Lee's surrender to Grant at Appomattox, let's recall that the events of April 9 marked an end to one of the most successful pursuits in military history ... one that is often underappreciated.
In some sixteen days the US forces under Grant's command repulsed a breakout attempt, severed Confederate supply lines and railroads, forced the evacuation of Petersburg and the the Confederate capital at Richmond.
That's for starters.
They then outmarched a foe determined to escape, blocked any chance of the enemy combining forces in North Carolina, then headed the insurgents off before they could reach the protection of the Blue Ridge Mountains.
In the process the foe suffered nearly 50% losses.