A very quick Twitter search for the term "vaccinated" pulls up a ton of anti-vax accounts.

I randomly selected one. Went to the account. And, what do you know, some of the accounts Twitter recommeds as a follow that are "similar" are Q accounts. ImageImageImage
And while NOT all of the acct's in his followers are real ... (cough, cough) ...

A number of them are Q accounts.

Anti-vax and Q nutters are absolutely intermingled. And, yes, Twitter's algorithms encourage it. Image
While we're discussing the Twitter's flawed algorithms ...

Let's not forget:
If you accidentally follow a fake acct, Twitter will encourage you to follow more from *that network*--proof that their algorithms can identify the networks ... yet somehow they remain on the platform. ImageImageImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Virginia Murr

Virginia Murr Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Verba_et_Vertus

14 Oct
Troll networks and Amplification networks are often the same entity. In such cases, judging them as separate platform abuses can do more harm than good.

This is how it works on Twitter.

(Long—but hopefully informative—thread)
1/
A political operator “influencer” (e.g., someone who runs a politicized non-profit) builds a large acct through:

1. Acct stuffing (bots)
2. Organizing a troll network in Twitter DM rooms to “protect” his TL & “fight” the opposition (& sometimes competitors in the same space)

2/
1.Building retweet (RT) DM rooms to amplify messaging (& slowly pulls in real users to “fight the good fight” alongside the bots/trolls)

2.Encouraging people running troll & RT accts to create multiple accts “in case Twitter silences them” (alts=bonus followers)

3/
Read 17 tweets
3 Oct 20
Thread of responses to Twitter's poor PR attempt today re: "threats" & other forms of harassment.

Note that the threats and harassment are mostly accepted as common. Also note, in cases where the accts are reported, Twitter often does nothing.

Read 18 tweets
3 Oct 20
I wasn't joking when I said this kind of thing is rampant on Twitter--and has been for years.

Rape threats - common.
Death threats - common.
Doxxing threats (and actual doxxing) - common.
Physical abuse threats - common.
Countless other types of harassment - common.
One of my "fond" memories of a death threat came in the form of a meme (from a troll acct) that said "people want to kill you."

Twitter found no fault with the tweet.
Then there are accts like this. Pure troll. The acct has been harassing and threatening people since Nov. 2019--and it is still active.
Read 6 tweets
19 Sep 20
As expected, Klyushin is tweeting about Coney-Barrett again (as he did in Jan. 2019).

Let me repeat: He regurgitates US news & pretends the ideas are his--to screw with us.

Klyushin is a bot-troll distributor (for Russian ops--as confirmed in Vol. 5 intel report). Nothing more
Almost verbatim, Klyushin regurgitates US news. One of my faves was his thread "directing" Trump about Afghanistan troop withdrawals--nearly every word of which was taken from an Erik Prince interview published just a few days prior.

unhackthevote.com/debunking-the-…
I spent a long time source-tracking bot-troll networks to Klyushin (one of many distributors I tracked)

Let me give a tiny example of why it is stunning that Twitter hasn't suspended his main acct.

These are 0 following/follower fakes pretending to be American. Note the replies ImageImage
Read 6 tweets
8 Sep 20
A quick reminder that since Twitter does not require real locations to be posted on accts, fake locations are common.

Be wary about reports that rely on location data without assessing legitimacy of the accts.

A few examples from the notorious model bot network:

FL is popular. ImageImageImageImage
Pick-a-state, any state.

How about NY .... ImageImageImageImage
Or, let's look at a mid-western state ... how about OH? ImageImageImageImage
Read 5 tweets
2 Sep 20
Soc. media "engagement" numbers can only have meaning if the engagement comes from real & individual accts.

With the sheer magnitude of fake engagement--political & commercial--on soc. media platforms, real engagement can't be determined. Thus, the metric is meaningless at best.
At worst, soc. media "engagement" as a metric is inherently deceptive.

Individuals, political groups, etc. purchase and/or create countless fake engagement. "Look how popular!"

Users & media alike validate the deception when we appeal to non-validated "engagement" as a metric.
Until platforms find a way to:
1. ensure that engagement is *real*
2. prevent (or at least disincentivize) algorithm gaming
3. not duplicate counts (Twitter counts multiple accts run by one person as "individual" accts--see SEC docs)

"Engagement" will continue to be meaningless.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(