@CNN once again seeks to deceive the public. Clickbait about ICU beds in FL is unconscionable. They know people only read headlines and they would never click a link inside to see the actual info. Shameful. 1/ cnn.com/world/live-new…
The link says that Broward County is out of beds. Only they aren’t according to the link provided by CNN. 2/
That website shows a whopping 17 counties in FL that *gasp* have no ICU beds left... 3/
Only of you look closely at the column that says “adult ICU census” you will see most of the column has ZEROS which means they never had any ICU beds to begin with. Probably rural hospitals. The three that have some full ICUs had <10 beds to begin with. 4/
It’s time we start to push back on this poor reporting from the media. @CNN is really trying to deceive and that’s horrible. We deserve better and the truth. Real people are really scared. #flattenthefear 5/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
More absurd fear mongering crap from the UK. Sorry for being so crass but this is getting to me. People with PTSD get to self report symptoms that they think may have been from a possible infection. WTAF? Let’s take a look...
THREAD: I've been hesitant to touch masks because of the hot button nature of them but this is getting out of control. New models showing thousands of lives will be saved by February is we all just mask up. It's absurd on it's face. 1/ statnews.com/2020/10/23/uni…
The science is unsettled. For every study saying they help, you can find the contrary saying they don't. That's the point. The OP is absurd. There is ZERO evidence to show thousands of lives will be saved because of masks. 2/
Modeling has been wrong on virtually everything since March. Viruses will do what they do, they don't care about your masks. Decades of research show that. The science didn't change the politics did. What a shame. 3/
Basic math destroys this one. If Sturgis had 250,000 cases link then at a IFR of 0.26% then there will be 650 deaths and there has been one. Unless of course the IFR is far far lower than that. Which would be even better news. 2/
SD had a “peak” of 623 cases in August 27 and it has dropped since then. So I’m not sure how they have the highest rate of infection. They’ve also not had any increased deaths in the state they have been hobbling along in the single digits for the whole epidemic 3/
THREAD: Because frankly I’m growing increasingly tired of countering those who are ignoring studies coming out from across the board showing children are not the drivers of this illness... 1/
“Mark Woodhouse, a leading epidemiologist and member of the government’s Sage committee, told The Times that it may have been a mistake to close schools in March given the limited role children play in spreading the virus.”
“Indicative data show there is no diff in the overall incidence of the lab-confirmed C19 cases in children aged 1 to 19 years in the two countries; contact tracings in primary schools in Finland found hardly any evidence of children infecting others.” 3/ bloomberg.com/amp/news/artic…
THREAD: I finally found the study I had read a while back and wished I had saved. This study was over an 8 yr period in MI. It followed several families and 4 HCoVs during that time. Children weren’t always the index cases. 1/
Let’s look at the study and some of the conclusions. “993 HCoV infections were identified during the 8 years, with OC43 most commonly seen and 229E the least.” 2/
“From 2010–11 through 2015–16, eligible households were those with 4 or more members at least 2 of whom were younger than 18 yrs. In subsequent yes, eligible households contained 3 or more members including at least 1 child younger than 5 yrs (2015-16) or <10 yrs (2017–18).” 3/
THREAD: There’s a lot to unwrap here. Basically in 2003 during the SARS outbreak there was a elder home in British Columbia which had an outbreak of a coronavirus. 1/ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Because of the SARS outbreak in Asia they did RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV on the residents of a nursing home and they came back positive. Remember I have explained before that RT-PCR testing has limitations, it detects viral particles, and can also return a positive if... 2/
...another virus is present like in this instance. This was frightening because that could decimate a nursing home, and be in the community at large which could also be undesirable. The illness though, wasn’t displaying the exact characteristics of SARS infection 3/