This is an article which, according to @jackturban MD describes "conversion therapy" which he says is illegal in 20 states (and in Canada if #BillC8 passes in its present form.) journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117… /2
The article describes an approach for treatment of gender dysphoria in young boys which is highly non-intrusive. Only the parents attend the therapy sessions which focus on such things as improving relations with the father and male peers. Parents are advised not to prohibit /2
cross-gender behavior but to respond with "benign neglect" Parents are told that the therapy is not intended to prevent homosexuality, which is not a medical condition. The article states that the goal of the treatment is to reduce the need for the "long and difficult process /3
of sex reassignment which includes hormonal and medical procedures with substantial risks and complications." I am not a medical doctor or psychologist so I can't say whether this treatment approach is effective but as a lawyer and citizen I can see no reason why it should be /4
illegal. The point here is that defenders of #Billc8 say that it permits exploration of gender identity issues but for the TRA community exploration can only be in one direction. I think it is very unlikely that a judge or jury would consider the kind of approach described in /5
this article as illegal "conversion therapy" but I think it is even more unlikely that a case would ever come to court because the doctors would be deterred by the simple threat of charges.
Here is the original tweet for those of you on @jack_turban 's blocklist.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Fans of Stranger Things might think that the experiments on helpless children by Dr. Brenner are as much a fantasy creation as demigorgons, but the history of unethical human experimentation in the US is frighteningly real and recent. [**Spoilers to follow**]
2/ The CIA ran the infamous MK-Ultra experiments on mind control in which involved hypnosis, electroshock and doses of LSD on subjects who did not consent or volunteered under coercion. history.com/mkultra-operat…
3/ Some of the most damaging experiments were conducted in Canada by Dr. Ewen Cameron at the Allan Memorial Institute at McGill University in Montreal. thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/mku…
1/ In 2025 the collapse of gender ideology began in earnest. People around the world have had enough of men pushing into women's spaces and sterilizing confused children in the name of "affirmative care". Politicians and the courts started to listen.
2/ As 2024 ended, an article by a group at the Amsterdam clinic made it clear that the leading proponents of gender affirming treatments have abandoned evidence-based medicine for pure gender ideology. open.substack.com/pub/justdad718…
3/ In the last days of the Biden administration, a U.S. Federal Court vacated Title IX rules which equated sex with gender identity.
1/ The NHS clinical trial of puberty blockers has now been approved and will start recruiting patients. The full trial protocol and a simplified study description are available here. kcl.ac.uk/research/pathw…
3/ Marcus Evans and Susan Evans, two of the original Tavistock clinic whistleblowers, have sent an open letter to health secretary Wes Streeting arguing that the study is poorly designed and risks causing serious harm to children. open.substack.com/pub/marcusevan…
1/ In his embarrassing interview with Stella O'Malley and Mia Hughes, Gordon Guyatt repeated the claim that the Health and Human Services report on gender medicine used the McMaster reviews to justify the denial of care to transgender people.
2/ This is a misrepresentation of the HHS report, which does not make any policy recommendations. It does present evidence which could be used to justify a ban on pediatric gender medicine but this evidence goes well beyond the systematic reviews. opa.hhs.gov/sites/default/…
3/ The HHS report conducted an umbrella review of all of the systematic reviews of pediatric gender medicine, and not just the McMaster reviews, to support the finding that the evidence of benefit is low certainty.
1/ One aspect of the controversy over @GuyattGH, @segm_ebm and the McMaster systematic reviews which has not been noted is the link with Egale Canada and ongoing litigation over the pediatric gender medicine ban in Alberta.
@GuyattGH @segm_ebm 2/ Egale Canada is the plaintiff in an action to block the Alberta legislation restricting medical transition of minors. A judge granted an interim injunction against the implementation of the law, and the government has appealed cbc.ca/news/canada/ca…
@GuyattGH @segm_ebm 3/ An analysis of the injunction decision by @GeoffSigalet argues that the judge was operating inside a liberal misinformation bubble. macdonaldlaurier.ca/a-misinformati…
A short but pointed thread by another leading figure in evidence based medicine on the extent to which the recent statement @GuyattGH and some of his colleagues on their systematic reviews of gender medicine betrays the core principles he helped to develop. /2
One of the principles of evidence based medicine is avoiding bias through management of conflicts of interest. The methodologists who lead systematic reviews and guideline development are supposed to be neutral on the clinical and policy implications of their work. /3
By expressing the opinions in the letter and donating to Egale Canada, which is a highly partisan advocacy group supporting medical transition of minors, Guyatt and his team are putting themselves in a position of intellectual conflict of interest on issues of gender medicine. /4