Reading @mashagessen's book, Surviving Autocracy, which helps us understand Trumpism historically and theoretically.
Want to note this passage: Hilter began to consolidate power by restricting the press and "expanding the powers of the police" to "detain people w/out charges."
Gessen makes the point that like "no president before him" Trump views "government with contempt" (30). But it strikes me that contempt for govt has been right-wing ideology since the 80's!
Yet as an ideology that hid the real ways right-wingers just used the govt to transfer wealth upward, contempt for govt was less an expression of intellectual principles and more a justiciation for dismantling the welfare state.
But Trump really *does* have contempt for governance. He exposes how right-wing ideology really does destroy democratic institutions and norms—and how we need those things simply to preserve our economy and citizens' very lives.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm excited to announce that I've restarted the @EndClimtSilence newsletter with a post on the main climate-communications opportunity I see in this difficult political moment: associating Trump's deep unpopularity with his support for coal, oil, and gas development.
🧵
When we have focused on fossil fuels—in the Beyond Coal campaign, via divestment, in pipeline fights, or under #KeepItInTheGround—coal, oil, & gas have been called polluting, toxic, the greatest source of emissions, and profoundly unjust.
And they are all of those things!
2/n
But at the same time, fossil fuels have tended to retain their *cultural* associations with many things Americans like: industry, manufacturing, prosperity, modernity.
3/n
China's State Counsel has announced that provinces will be graded on their efforts to peak emissions before 2030.
"Authorities ranked as making unsatisfactory progress ... could be subject to disciplinary processes if issues aren’t rectified." 💥
🧵
In The Language of Climate Politics, I wrote about how this accountability was enacted in the 2021 "1+N Documents," China's whole-of government, whole-of-society policy to achieve net-zero emissions by 2060.
👇
This is the implementation of this provision in real time.
2/n
As happy as I am by that China (or any nation) might actually create a net-zero economy in time to halt warming at a relatively survivable level, I am also worried that the authoritarian country who controls key global supply chains seems likely to get there first.
3/n
@NoemaMag What is China's climate policy? Called the “1+N” framework, it's an all-of-government, all-of-society blueprint for the country’s decarbonization. Its foundational documents were enacted in 2021.
3/n
🚨Do NOT talk about solar geoengineering as a climate "solution."🚨
1/n
As people start to panic—and as others advance the next phase of the fossil-fuel agenda—we're now seeing a lot of talk about the need to research solar geoengineering (SG).
Fine. I actually agree that SG should be researched systematically.
2/n
But what that research needs to establish is precisely whether solar geoengineering is or is not a solution: if and how much it cools the planet and whether its dangers (or "trade-offs," if you're disingenuous) will allow for deployment or not.