Sabyasachi Kar Profile picture
Jul 28, 2020 8 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Very useful to have views and counter-views on these issues. So thanks to Viral Acharya and @dugalira for the interview and @teasri for the counter.

Would like to add a few points from a political economy perspective:
1. Agree with Viral that the banking sector has always been misused in India for political economy reasons. But assuming that the legislation of rules will prevent this is not consistent with developing country experiences.
It is well established in the institutions literature that countries simply pretend to implement rules but work around them when they are politically difficult to implement. Lant Pritchett calls this *isomorphic mimicry*.
Just look at how our budget deficits are being managed.
2. On the Inflation Targeting framework. Viral is right that the IT framework has experienced far less political interference than the banking sector or liquidity management.

But that is also because of political priorities.
As long as growth and inflation rates are reasonable, monetary policy and the policy interest rates are not politically salient. Notice how low growth rates have started putting political pressure on monetary policy in the last year or so.
By comparison, the banking sector and liquidity management (proxy for deficit monetization) are far more political because they have important implications for the two important political activities of any government - State-business relationship and clientelist welfare programs.
3. About the IT framework, there is an argument made that it has been reasonably successful in the short period following it's implementation in India. I would argue that this is because it has not really faced a politically challenging situation like a stagflation.
To sum up, my arguments are not against the adoption of rules. Rules are very useful in making economic policy predictable and help in encouraging private investments. But ignoring political realities and adopting unimplementable rules will lead to creative ways of avoiding them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sabyasachi Kar

Sabyasachi Kar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Sabya_K

Aug 5, 2023
🧵 1/13

India’s new licensing policy for laptops.

Two Qs have been raised in social media about this policy.

Q1. Can this be characterized as a return to License Raj?

Q2. Can this protectionism lead to lower productivity and lower growth?

Here, I share my views on Q1.
2/13

So, is this licensing policy for laptop production a return to License Raj, or not?

The answer, like most of economics, is conditional.

It has two parts.
3/13

1. The current policy is different from the regime of the 60s/70s, and it would be misleading to characterize it as a return to License Raj.

2. But it could lead to a creeping return to a License Raj-type regime over time. Unless specific steps are taken to counter these.
Read 13 tweets
Apr 23, 2021
1/
Thread.

A lot of useful discussions going on about pricing of vaccines. Some thoughts on this.

There are 2 issues here. The first, how much should the vaccine producers charge for the vaccines?

The second, how much should the citizens pay to get themselves vaccinated?
2/
It is important to address these two issues separately, rather than conflating them.
3/
Let’s start with the second one, the amount we have to pay to get vaccinated.

Here, for the vast majority of our citizens, it makes complete sense to provide it for free, with the government (centre or state) picking up the tab.
Read 14 tweets
Dec 8, 2020
Thread. Agriculture as shock absorber.

In all the discussions on Indian agriculture and farming, one aspect of this sector gets largely overlooked.

Its role as a social safety net.

1/11
For the poor and the vulnerable, the agricultural and allied sectors are still the main safety net in times of crisis.

And it is much bigger and more effective than all the other safety nets - like MNREGA - that we currently have.

2/11
Safety nets are most important in countries that have a lot of vulnerable people and have adopted a market-led growth strategy.

Markets are useful in driving higher growth over time, but are also much more vulnerable to many types of shocks.

Covid-19 is a good example.

3/11
Read 11 tweets
Oct 19, 2020
Thread.

Politics and political-economy of Bangladesh vis-a-vis India.

Since independence, the political developments in Bangladesh has not been great.

Military coups. Political killings. De facto one party rule.

1/6
But the political economy of Bangladesh has been great for growth for a long time now.

The garments industry is the engine of Bangladeshi growth.

And Irrespective of who has been in power, the garments industry has always received royal treatment.

2/6
In India, on the other hand, politics has done well. The one success that we have had is democracy.

It has its flaws. But who doesn't?

Looking at what is happening in even developed countries right now, we have done well.

3/6
Read 7 tweets
Oct 5, 2020
The disruptions caused by Covid-19 and the lockdowns may make the work of macro policy more complicated than usual, simply by worsening the short-run tradeoff between growth and inflation.

Let me explain.

1/6
A major factor behind the growth-inflation tradeoff is that in any economy close to full capacity, there is excess capacity in some sectors, while others face capacity constraints.

2/6
Increasing aggregate demand in such a situation lead to more growth in the excess-capacity sectors but also more inflation in the sectors facing constraints.

This is the tradeoff.

3/6
Read 6 tweets
Oct 5, 2020
Short thread on the politics of economic policymaking.

How does economics analyze the impact of politics on policymaking?

The most common framework used for this in economic analysis, is the median voter theorem.

1/5
This framework suggests that a majority rule voting system will select the outcome most preferred by the median voter.

This would imply that an average voter (represented by the median) has the power to determine policy choices.

2/5
An alternative framework that has been influenced by political science is elite theory.

This approach suggests that powerful groups like business or political elites determine policy choices.

The average voter doesn't really have a significant role or influence.

3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(