Grading the opening statements from Zuck, Bezos, Cook and Pichai in today's House antitrust hearing, a thread:
Jeff Bezos is appearing before Congress for the first time and his prepared statement is making up for lost time clocking in at an amazing 8 pages
-1 for violating Strunk & White’s 17th rule. Brevity.
Bezos also says curbside pickup at Walmart is a threat to Amazon and touts Walmart’s 74% online sales growth. Amazon is still number 1.
-1 for touting a competitor
Bezos immediately follows by saying Amazon was among the first retailers to pay a $15 minimum wage. Applauds Target and Best Buy for following. Doesn’t mention Walmart, which hasn’t.
+1 for subtweet
Bezos, the world’s richest man, also seeks pity points with a story of Amazon shares falling from $116 to $6 in the tech bubble. At $3,000 now, I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul
-4
Bezos closes with the fact his dad is a Cuban immigrant. Would be pandering if not for this truth “Immigrants like my dad see what a treasure this country is—they have perspective and can often see it even more clearly than those of us who were lucky enough to be born here.”
+1
Sundar Pichai opens by mentioning he grew up in India without a computer, basically upstaging Bezos’ one-degree removed immigrant story.
Savage +1
Flexing Google’s FREE tools, Pichai stumbles with this weird example of Google Analytics, which allows people “to track the effectiveness of their marketing spend.”
It’s free to track how much you spend!
-2
Pichai says this about searching for info: ”You can ask Alexa a question from your kitchen; read your news on Twitter; ask friends for information via WhatsApp; and get recommendations on Snapchat or Pinterest.”
Getting life advice from Snap leads you to a dark place
-1
It’s been a bit since Apple CEO Tim Cook appeared before congress, so he takes a while to hit form but offers this gem: “Apple does not have a dominant market share in any market where we do business.”
iPhone is 45.5% of the smartphone mkt
-1
Cook also says this about Apple’s 30% commission on in-app purchases: “App Store developers set prices for their apps and never pay for shelf space.”
Technically shelves don’t exist in a digital world, but then again they kinda do
-1
Zuck is a vet in front of congress, which is why it’s surprising to see his statement come in at 5 pages that almost say “if you’re going to take my time, I’m going to take your time.”
Zuck says this about FB: “We believe in values - democracy, competition, inclusion and free expression - that the American economy was built on.”
Bold statement at an antirust hearing
-1
Zuck also size shames congress: “As I understand our laws, companies aren’t bad just because they are big.”
AKA Don’t break us cause u ain’t us.
+1
OVERALL OPENING STATEMENT SCORE:
BEZOS: -4
PICHAI: -2
COOK: -2
ZUCK: +1
Could be anyone’s game as we hit questioning, especially with a newcomer in the world’s richest man…
Rep. Jim Jordan going on a rant about Twitter "censoring" conservatives during a hearing with Google, Facebook, Amazon and Apple is not a great use of time
Congress gets the heads of the richest companies in the world on one call, including the world's richest man, and this is the shot we get
HEAD FAKE: Zuck submitted the longest opening statement for the record, but was the only one among the #BigTech CEOs to go that far under the 5 minute mark:
Zuck: 4:42
Bezos: 5:05
Cook: 5:07
Pichai: ~ 5:00
Ranking member Jim Sensenbrenner just asked Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg why Donald Trump Jr.'s Twitter account was suspended for promoting hydroxychloroquine
This hearing is off to a great start
Nadler lands a solid flurry of punches on Zuck buying Instagram as a move to eliminate a competitor in violation of antitrust laws:
Zuck: "It was not a guarantee that Instagram was going to succeed,” calling it an American success story + adds the FTC found no issue then
Did Rep. Greg Steube just put his dad on blast for moving his campaign emails to the spam folder?
FINALLY at nearly 2.5 hours into the antitrust hearing, Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon becomes the first to bring up Amazon's acquisition of Diapers .com and how price cutting tactics could be exclusionary conduct to squash a competitor
Bezos sneaks by on the ol "don't remember" play
+1
Pressing on his proposed legislation to eliminate slave labor, Rep. Buck gets Pichai to bend first to explicitly agree to prevent products that use slave labor to sell on Big Tech platforms
Cook stopped short, the rest caved after Pichai explicitly agreed
+1 Pichai
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It was surreal to be back in court for Do Kwon's trial, just a few floors from where SBF was convicted
I was the first to interview Do after Terra's collapse, and went to SBF's home right before his trial. Here's why these cases are both extremely different and eerily similar 🧵
For starters, this is a civil fraud case against Do Kwon and Terraform Labs. There is no jail time associated with this ruling (though the DOJ was lingering around the courtroom today)
At the heart of the case is exactly what we explored in our interview — Failure vs. Fraud
The SEC has built their case around the climax of our piece on Terra's collapse. As we presented it more than a year ago, this was always going to come down to:
NEW: Do Kwon / Terra vs. SEC off to a hot start in Manhattan court today
We already got a jury selected along with opening statements from both the SEC and defense teams (plus’s some pretty hilarious material from Judge Rakoff)
Here’s everything from Day 1 🧵
It’s my first time back at the courthouse since SBF’s trial, and this one is way less crowded
Showed up late cause I was coming straight from Newark, but still got a seat.
Most obvious difference: all suits in the courtroom. Terra and the SEC came to play for the civil trial!
Judge Rakoff laid out ground rules from the jump:
Trial expected to take 2 weeks
Only 4-word objections allowed
“The only way you can get me mad is a speedy objection. You say 3 words: ‘Objection, lack of foundation.’ Ok, maybe I’ll extend to 4 words.”
The Winklevoss Twins' crypto platform Gemini is the latest player to get hit in the crypto collapse
But they were seen as one of *the good* crypto platforms — above board, regulated, and backed 1:1. So how did even they run into problems? A mini thread 🧵
First off, as we've seen this year — centralized crypto lenders have basically been operating as unregulated banks: promising interest rates 140x-higher than traditional banks, taking in customer deposits, and loaning them out
Even Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz said that
But unlike Celsius, and BlockFi, Gemini had tried to appear safer with its operations
For one, it never launched its own risky token. It had a stablecoin, sure, but GUSD was backed 1:1 with audited cash held in a trust ✅
It also didn't offer 8% interest to its customers alone
Most NFT mints optimize to sell out as quickly as possible, or make a lot of money. But if NFTs are all about "community" around a shared goal you'd think fostering the *right* community would be a higher priority
Here's one decentralized approach to put community first 🧵thread
2/ First thing first: Identify a genuine shared goal that isn’t “number go up.”
With precious few exceptions, the NFT market is currently driven by speculation. People will always want to make money. That’s never going to change.
But that creates a destructive paradox
3/ A “community” of people trying to outmaneuver and undercut each other for profit is not a community. That’s a 10,000-way Mexican standoff
When the shared goal is only financial upside, you can share the desire, but when push comes to shove, you’ll rarely all share the success
Crypto project @terra_money ( $LUNA ) has surged 50% in the last week to hit a new all-time high even with bitcoin down 5%
Its algorithmically-backed stablecoin $UST has become the largest of its kind and keeps picking up Web3 adoption as THE DeFi dollar
Why that is huge ⬇️ 1/X
A "DeFi dollar" has been the elusive holy grail of crypto. How do you make a stablecoin stay at $1?
The largest stablecoins (Tether and USDC) are backed by cash. But what if regulators seize those accounts? What if a company lies about its holdings? 2/X
Terra's simple starting point is that its stablecoin is not backed by cash or assets at all. Instead it's backed by its own cryptocurrency.
People can convert $LUNA into $UST and vice-versa. While Luna's price fluctuates, UST remains priced at $1 3/X