Brooks D. Simpson Profile picture
Jul 29, 2020 9 tweets 2 min read Read on X
One needs to understand that Confederate heritage apologists aren't really interested in the past.

They are interested in a usable past to serve present needs.

They also see heritage as ultimately about themselves.
Listen as they talk about "we" and "us" and "you." It's not about the past. It's about a construct of the past that makes one feel good about one's ancestors (and not all of them have Confederate ancestors) and justifies one's present beliefs.
This is one reason they decry "revisionist history" and "political correctness." They imagine that an "objective" rendering of the past would confirm their belief system.
News flash: "Birth of a Nation" and "Gone With the Wind" are both exercises in "political correctness," white supremacy style.

Want a movie that summarizes mainstream understanding of the Civil War in 1940? Try "Santa Fe Trail."
In short, they believe that an "objective" view of history would confirm white supremacy and Confederate heritage assumptions about life and politics.
BTW, Southern heritage is not Confederate heritage. Southern heritage is far more inclusive and rich. Confederate heritage concentrates on four years of ultimate futility, and it's dominated by sore losers seeking to win in peace what they lost in war.
The irony of Confederate heritage is that the Confederacy became more popular after it died in 1865.
I have some close experience with this. I married into a southern family with Confederate ancestors. The racism, bigotry, and ignorance was palpable. Some of it surfaced over time in ways that made me realize that I would be better off elsewhere ... as I am. :)
The same sentiments were expressed by people who married into the family, so it was always touch and go.

It was like a #SHEAR2020 plenary nearly every week.

So I seceded.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brooks D. Simpson

Brooks D. Simpson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BrooksDSimpson

May 8
It's often asserted the as president Ulysses S. Grant destroyed the Ku Klux Klan.

The reality is not nearly as satisfying or uplifting to those who deplore white supremacist paramilitary terrorism as conducted primarily by veterans of the Confederate war effort.
The KKK became a shorthand descriptor for the many forms of white supremacist terrorism that slowly took organized form in the late 1860s. There were other massacres (Memphis) and attacks (New Orleans) against blacks and their white allies in the Reconstructing South.
By 1867 and 1868, when Black men in large numbers exercised the right to vote for the first time, white supremacist terrorism, often defined as KKK activity, targeted Black voters and Republican officeholders.

This was voter suppression, pure and simple.
Read 21 tweets
Apr 10
Yesterday I shared with you various images of the events in Wilmer McLean's parlor on April 9, 1865.

Today I plan to share a few more images that shape our memory of what happened that day ... and April 10, 1865 as well.

Grant and Lee met a second time this day in 1865.
These images fall into three categories.

First, there are images of an imagined surrender conference outside that draw upon talk of an apple tree at Appomattox.

Second, there's Lee's departure from the McLean House.

Third, there's the April 10 meeting.
Let's look first at the imagined outdoor April 9 encounter.

Sometimes Grant and Lee meet while mounted on their horses. A rather dapper Ulysses, no? Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 9
Visual portrayals of what happened in Wilmer McLean's parlor on April 9, 1865, at Appomattox Court House are worth some study.

Here's a simple early version: two generals, one table. Image
The table is a curious effort to bring together elements of the two tables involved in the event. Grant said at a brown wood oval table; Lee sat at a squarish marble table. Grant's chair was a swivel desk chair backed in leather, while Lee sat in a high-backed chair.
Image
Image
Yet it took a while for artists to include those four pieces of furniture, let alone to assign them to the general who used them. Image
Read 21 tweets
Apr 9
As true Americans commemorate the anniversary of Lee's surrender to Grant at Appomattox, let's recall that the events of April 9 marked an end to one of the most successful pursuits in military history ... one that is often underappreciated.
In some sixteen days the US forces under Grant's command repulsed a breakout attempt, severed Confederate supply lines and railroads, forced the evacuation of Petersburg and the the Confederate capital at Richmond.

That's for starters.
They then outmarched a foe determined to escape, blocked any chance of the enemy combining forces in North Carolina, then headed the insurgents off before they could reach the protection of the Blue Ridge Mountains.

In the process the foe suffered nearly 50% losses.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 8
Tomorrow is the anniversary of Robert E. Lee's surrender to Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Court House.

Most of us recall the generous terms Grant offered Lee, which stood in contrast to his reputation as "Unconditional Surrender" Grant.

But what about Lee?
After all, on April 6, at the battle of Sailor's Creek, Lee watched as his army crumbled under US attacks. "My God, has the army dissolved?" Lee declared in desperation.

Lee was in dire straits.
Gone was any chance of uniting with Confederate forces under Joseph E. Johnston in North Carolina.

Gone also was the chance of dealing any sort of significant blow against his foe.

All that was left was to continue westward to the protection of the Blue Ridge Mountains.
Read 23 tweets
Apr 8
A few notes on Ulysses S. Grant's personal involvement with the institution of slavery prior to the American Civil War for those who might be interested ...
Grant grew up in an antislavery home. As a boy his father had worked in a tannery owned by Owen Brown, who had a son named John. I bet you've heard of him.

As a boy Grant attended a preparatory school in Ripley, Ohio, run by Reverend John Rankin.
What else did Rankin run? A stop on the Underground Railroad.

Recall Eliza's fording the Ohio in *Uncle Tom's Cabin*?

The real life event took place in this vicinity. The Eliza in question was Eliza Harris. Image
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(