Stefan Kertesz, MD, MSc Profile picture
Jul 29, 2020 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
1/How to fix a problem in addiction treatment: a Train the Trainer model to expand #opioid use disorder treatment, tackling barriers: knowledge (providers & administrators), workload, innovation fatigue, telehealth, credentialing. In @SubstanceAbuseJ pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32697170/
2/The key was to address this reality: there is considerable failure to reach patients with OUD with medication based therapies in @VeteransHealth (same as outside) with only a small % (often just 1/4 or less) obtaining treatment
3/The SCOUTT Initiative drew 13 staff from each VA network, with 4 leaders in mental health, substance use, primary care, pain services, and 7 multidisciplinary staff (pharmacists, nurses, physicians, therapists) - for special training- conference & community of practice
4/They implemented two LEVEL 1 clinics (addiction treatment via primary care, mental or pain settings) within 12 months and another within 24 months. Heavy emphasis on nurse collaboration
5/As this began, SCOUTT leaders anticipated PRECISELY those challenges our health care system fails to consider when implementing change: competing time demands, stigma of OUD, overworked front line staff, and lack of incentive for real change. That required more resources
6/Crucial for reporters: Reporting on "lack of treatment" or "prescribing opioids" is too narrow. The question to ask, for rehabilitation, pain, or addiction is this:

"what tangible steps should health systems and their payers take to implement change successfully".
7/Hats off to this guy (left side) who led the SCOUTT Initiative to expand OUD treatment in VA, @vahsrd investigator, clinician and nurturer-in-chief @AJ_Gordon #mensch
#Tristan Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stefan Kertesz, MD, MSc

Stefan Kertesz, MD, MSc Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StefanKertesz

Nov 15, 2023
Truth💣
1/ The “NARXCare” opioid Rx risk algorithm is in all Prescription Monitoring Databases,ie ~1 bn Rx’s/year

NOW in @JournalGIM
✅evidence does not yet exist to support it as safe or protective
✅It has flourished due to lack of federal oversight
link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Image
2/The authors, led by Dr Michele Buonara, review the core argument as one in which this algorithm with low evidence to its favor

and high risk of harm

has gone unregulated

despite apparently fulfilling @US_FDA criteria that mandate it be regulated Image
3/Nearly all prescribers and national pharmacies now see the Bamboo Health, Inc proprietary “NARXcare” algorithm in a more prominent position *than the prescription history itself” when they view a prescription history. Image
Read 10 tweets
Nov 3, 2023
1/Arguing for methadone deregulation, Dr. Ruth Potee notes that in an auditorium of 400 addiction specialists, almost NONE prescribe methadone (because they can't)

"Methadone is a miracle drug that no one has access to"

There are more people who offer Botox than offer methadone
2/With most blood pressure and anti-cholesterol meds, the number needed to treat to save one life is well over 100

With methadone, it’s 40

Number needed to treat to improve a life=1 #AMERSA2023
@AMERSA_tweets 3/Regulations for methadone care have not changed in 50 years.

How many other aspects of health care have not changed one bit in 50 years?

In the map: access to methadone care is almost completely absent in extremely large parts of the country.

-Dr Potee Image
Read 31 tweets
Sep 24, 2023
1/For patients on opioids, weighing “risks vs benefits” with shared decisionmaking – as CDC urged- may be out of reach for today’s doctors & patients.

Writing in @SAj_AMERSA @PoojaLagisetty & I propose weighing Harms of continuing vs Harms of reducing
A🧵
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08…
Image
2/Opioid Tapering has proven a mixed bag. Research finds some patients ⬇️doses with no harm, but others suffer catastrophes

The CDC urged “shared decision-making” about risk & benefit

But for opioid BENEFITS, docs & patients routinely disagree cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/7…
3/A patient may report an opioid benefit

Patient: “I can still do my activities”.
Doc: "No way, not really. I read the SPACE trial, and there is NO benefit (that would outweigh the opioids’ risk)”
"Shared decision-making" seems *doomed* here Image
Read 12 tweets
Sep 22, 2023
1/I watch with concern as DEA prosecutions of MDs still seem to rely on “they prescribed more than I would” despite a 9-0 ruling of
Supreme Court last year

Sudden termination of opioids & progressive abandonment of 5-8 million patients is dangerous

pressherald.com/2023/09/21/ken…
Image
2/In Maine the prosecuted Dr Norris is board -certified in addiction and runs an addiction treatment program.

Thus far, she has not faced discipline from her Board. The Maine based expert witness for the DEA *resigned from the case*

pressherald.com/2022/10/27/mai…
Image
3/the challenge is weighing Harm vs Harm

Nearly every addiction doc treating patients with addiction or overlap addiction+pain is walking a tight rope

The Rx risks a HARM

But a HARM may follow stopping the Rx: suicide or overdose

That is harm vs harm
seacoastonline.com/story/news/202…
Read 9 tweets
Jul 20, 2023
1/Even on inpatient rounds, it is possible to introduce the idea that addiction isn’t (only) in the brain.

I contrast @NIAAAnews “brain disease” against a behavioral economics vide substance use as a pattern of behavior occurring in relation to environmental context Image
2/On teaching rounds we read aloud and discussed the @NIAAAnews brain-science model of addiction, pulling just a few lines off their website Image
3/then we read lines from Chapter 39 of “Evaluating the Brain Disease Model of Addiction” - this presents harmful substance use as a pattern of behavior based on assessment of competing rewards, delay or uncertainty of desired rewards, risks and costs - ie behavioral economics Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 3, 2023
1/In thinking about the OPAL opioid Trial (as 1st line treatment for back pain) - and other trials, I want to model an idea that I welcome others to shoot down or support

Comparing mean effects of opioid to placebo as 1st line treatment
2/studying the average effect for a treatment with very ⬆️ variability of “benefit” and “aversive” responses is confusing

it makes comparisons to placebo a bit of a mess.

Here is my hypothetical graph of a placebo’s average range of aversive impacts and beneficial impacts
3/With placebo - I suggest- whatever bad effects people feel (even if they are not truly “caused” by placebo) or benefits are either along some narrow range.

or you can designate as zero
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(