Gavan Reilly Profile picture
Jul 30, 2020 9 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Another bunfight beckons in the Dáil today: the Dáil reform committee (with proposals backed by Govt and SF) is reassigning speaking time so that the smaller parties and independent groups are squeezed. Currently they have disproportionate speaking time but won’t cede it lightly!
A (fairly crude) illustration of what is proposed for a debate on a new Bill. Basically the Government and SF will get an extra speaking slot between the opposition parties and proportionately more time.

Other parties say new proportions are okay but sequencing marginalises them Image
Jennifer Whitmore of the SocDems raising this on the floor now. Varadkar says he is "not au fait with the details" but says it is "entirely appropriate" that speaking time be allocated in a proportionate way, otherwise "microparties" get time and Govt backbenchers do not
"We are going to re-establish democracy in this House," says Varadkar, which goes down … less than well. #Dáil
I hear this is potentially being revised by the Business Committee this lunchtime - and only appeared very briefly on the Dáil agenda earlier before being quietly taken off it again
Marian Harkin raising this on the Dáil floor now too. Her group's speaking time would now be preceded by six different Government speakers. Compares it to European Parliament where all parties, irrespective of size, get to speak in the first round of debate.
ℹ️ I hear a compromise has been put on the table. All parties would get to speak in the first round of a debate (though with a bit less time for smaller groups); larger groups would claim more time in later rounds. Overall time is proportionate but small groups not marginalised
🚨 The compromise is off. The Government parties are unwilling to accept this practice and want to go ahead with their original, where every opposition group (except Labour) would be delayed by additional Govt and SF speakers. Set to be put to an acrimonious vote later
I hear it was pointed out at the Business Committee that a speaking order like this, where only limited parties get to contribute in the first round of debate, has not been used in the Dáil since 1921-22 👀

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gavan Reilly

Gavan Reilly Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gavreilly

Feb 27
Catherine Martin opens her appearance at Oireachtas Media Committee by saying the two external reports into culture and governance at RTÉ - which were notionally due to report by end of February - are delayed and will now be handed over next month.
First question, on the button, from SF's Fintan Warfield: shouldn't you have spent last Thursday evening meeting with Siún Ní Raghallaigh instead of being on TV?

Answer: It would be wrong to pull out of a prearranged interview, and it needed more than a rushed evening meeting
Warfield puts it to her that, as politicians, both know that interview plans change and guests often cancel at short notice. "I don't think your first job as minister is to go on television… surely you know you were going to be asked, had you confidence in Siún Ní Raghallaigh"
Read 42 tweets
Jul 11, 2023
📺 Coverage of the Oireachtas Media Committee getting underway in a mo on Virgin Media One.

Be advised: Tubridy and Kelly intend to read the same opening statements (as PAC) in full to open the meeting, to contextualise answers for the nine members who weren’t there earlier
Huzzah. By consent, Tubridy and Kelly won't re-read the full opening statements (to do so was a deferential act to a committee that doesn't want it) so into the questions we go.

FF's Christopher O'Sullivan goes first
O'Sullivan picks up the baton from PAC. You know you were issuing invoices for consultancy fees for services that wen't consultancy…

Kelly: It's what RTÉ asked us to do.

CO'S: You understand people's scepticism?

Kelly: But they're the facts.
Read 51 tweets
Jul 11, 2023
Imelda Munster is first up, asking about the genesis of the 'tripartite' deal (RTE/Renault/Tubridy).

Kelly: "This is nothing about pay cuts, this is a separate commercial deal…" Says it was proposed to him by Breda O'Keeffe, then RTE CFO.
Kelly frames the idea of underwriting the €75k deal suggesting it was to insulate Tubridy from any Late Late sponsor change.

"It was never for RTÉ to pay. The guarantee was for, if another sponsor came on", that they would inherit a similar arrangement for personal appearances
Munster: But the deal was underwritten, at your request, from the public purse?

Kelly: I asked for the deal to be underwritten because the relationship with the sponsor is with RTE and not us.

Munster: But underwritten by RTE?

Kelly: Yes.

Munster: So the public purse.
Read 72 tweets
May 9, 2023
‘One way or another, Albert has to go’ – Peadar Tóibín calls for removal of prince’s statue from Leinster House

…so, there’s a funny story about the last time someone proposed to remove this statue… independent.ie/irish-news/one…
…which is that there was a petition sent to the Oireachtas Petitions Committee in 2017 making a broadly similar argument - that Albert was the consort of a much unloved imperial monarch and there was no justification for the Leinster House authorities to keep him there.

Except:
Firstly it turned out that the statue was the property of the OPW and not of the Oireachtas, so Leinster House didn’t have the authority to simply remove it: it wasn’t theirs to throw away.

But then the committee members did a bit of digging and…
Read 8 tweets
Apr 27, 2023
Niall Collins now on his feet in the Dáil. "I am in absolutely no doubt that … my actions were at all times legally correct"
"The question of the potential sale of the property followed various expressions of interest by members of the public… one of the people… was Dr Eimear O'Connor, who is also my wife. It was agreed at the area committee meeting that the property should be sold on open market"
"An area committee of a local authority, which in the case of the Bruss area committee included only seven councillors, does not have disposal rights for the sale of council property. This is a reserved and statutory function of the full county council by law"
Read 10 tweets
Apr 27, 2023
ℹ️ I understand Niall Collins’ personal statement to the Dáil will be made at around 1:50pm today
Same topic being raised at Leaders' Questions by Holly Cairns, who asks if standards of transparency and accountability in FF are slipping, given Barry Cowen was sacked for not taking questions while Collins will now (twice) be resisting calls for similar
"At the outset of this, the full story was not told," says the Taoiseach, alluding to the Sept 2008 meeting at which the sale was formally approved, when Collins was already gone
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(