🚨 Neasa Hourigan has just voted against the Government
Dáil was voting on a Labour amendment to Govt’s new tenancy Bill, which renews rent freeze/evictions moratorium - but only for those who self-certify as having financial distress
Labour wanted to extend it on a blanket basis; Govt says unconstitutional; Hourigan supported anyway
Ironically Hourigan herself is the Green Party’s Dáil whip, so the immediate disciplinary process is unclear
I understand Hourigan has no desire to leave the Green parliamentary party
ℹ️ Neasa Hourigan has resigned as Green Party whip but intends to remain a member of the parliamentary party
Hourigan has just voted against the government for a second time - she supported a cross-party amendment which would have removed any criminal sanction for those who fraudulently self-certify as experiencing financial distress
…and now for a third time, supporting a SocDems amendment which aimed to extend the rental protections to all tenants and not just those in financial trouble.
A final vote on the Bill is to be held at 6pm and may be seen as sealing her future.
…and a fourth time, backing a SF bid to extend the rental protection to all tenants and not just those in rent arrears
…and a fifth time.
Hourigan has voted against the government’s Bill as a whole, an act which is much more likely to see her stripped of the party whip. #Dáil
(It also seems another Green TD abstained on the final vote?)
Statement from @JTG_ie on why Hourigan opposed the Govt’s Bill
🚨 Junior minister Joe O’Brien - a pro-coalition Green TD - abstained in the final vote on his own government’s Bill
Statement from @neasa_neasa on her vote against the Government's tenancy legislation this evening
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Catherine Martin opens her appearance at Oireachtas Media Committee by saying the two external reports into culture and governance at RTÉ - which were notionally due to report by end of February - are delayed and will now be handed over next month.
First question, on the button, from SF's Fintan Warfield: shouldn't you have spent last Thursday evening meeting with Siún Ní Raghallaigh instead of being on TV?
Answer: It would be wrong to pull out of a prearranged interview, and it needed more than a rushed evening meeting
Warfield puts it to her that, as politicians, both know that interview plans change and guests often cancel at short notice. "I don't think your first job as minister is to go on television… surely you know you were going to be asked, had you confidence in Siún Ní Raghallaigh"
📺 Coverage of the Oireachtas Media Committee getting underway in a mo on Virgin Media One.
Be advised: Tubridy and Kelly intend to read the same opening statements (as PAC) in full to open the meeting, to contextualise answers for the nine members who weren’t there earlier
Huzzah. By consent, Tubridy and Kelly won't re-read the full opening statements (to do so was a deferential act to a committee that doesn't want it) so into the questions we go.
FF's Christopher O'Sullivan goes first
O'Sullivan picks up the baton from PAC. You know you were issuing invoices for consultancy fees for services that wen't consultancy…
Imelda Munster is first up, asking about the genesis of the 'tripartite' deal (RTE/Renault/Tubridy).
Kelly: "This is nothing about pay cuts, this is a separate commercial deal…" Says it was proposed to him by Breda O'Keeffe, then RTE CFO.
Kelly frames the idea of underwriting the €75k deal suggesting it was to insulate Tubridy from any Late Late sponsor change.
"It was never for RTÉ to pay. The guarantee was for, if another sponsor came on", that they would inherit a similar arrangement for personal appearances
Munster: But the deal was underwritten, at your request, from the public purse?
Kelly: I asked for the deal to be underwritten because the relationship with the sponsor is with RTE and not us.
…which is that there was a petition sent to the Oireachtas Petitions Committee in 2017 making a broadly similar argument - that Albert was the consort of a much unloved imperial monarch and there was no justification for the Leinster House authorities to keep him there.
Except:
Firstly it turned out that the statue was the property of the OPW and not of the Oireachtas, so Leinster House didn’t have the authority to simply remove it: it wasn’t theirs to throw away.
But then the committee members did a bit of digging and…
Niall Collins now on his feet in the Dáil. "I am in absolutely no doubt that … my actions were at all times legally correct"
"The question of the potential sale of the property followed various expressions of interest by members of the public… one of the people… was Dr Eimear O'Connor, who is also my wife. It was agreed at the area committee meeting that the property should be sold on open market"
"An area committee of a local authority, which in the case of the Bruss area committee included only seven councillors, does not have disposal rights for the sale of council property. This is a reserved and statutory function of the full county council by law"
ℹ️ I understand Niall Collins’ personal statement to the Dáil will be made at around 1:50pm today
Same topic being raised at Leaders' Questions by Holly Cairns, who asks if standards of transparency and accountability in FF are slipping, given Barry Cowen was sacked for not taking questions while Collins will now (twice) be resisting calls for similar
"At the outset of this, the full story was not told," says the Taoiseach, alluding to the Sept 2008 meeting at which the sale was formally approved, when Collins was already gone