1. FYJC Science at Andheri Bhavan's college. First biology lecture. Having studied biology in vernacular language till Std 10th, everything was a bouncer.
Bole toh ... sab upar se jaa raha tha.
It was a shock for a ' brilliant' 'School Topper's small town boy.
Nearly similar situation in all other subjects as the language of education was English.
Being a hostelite prevented from getting into depression.
Bhavan's had a girl's hostel in the campus then.
Not sure if it's still there.
Some of my hostel mates were from the same public school in Panchagani as some of the girls from the girl's hostel.
They were a group. Soon I became a part of the group.
[I still wonder why & how of it]
But, it worked like a miracle & by the end of first year - I was cool.
Not everyone is as lucky.
Cut to - First year law at GLC. A lot of hostelites at GCH were from small towns.
By this time - having spent 5 years in 5 different colleges (all in western suburbs & SoBo) & 3 different hostels - I was what they called - quintessential Bambaiya
But the First year law students, hailing from rural Maharashtra found it tremendously hard to cope with study of law ....in English.
Cut to 2020 : try visiting Rajpuria Hostel at Andheri. Students from Rajasthan pursuing CA. Try & understand their English handicap.
These graduates from different parts of Rajasthan are completely out of place. Not for lack of excellence in CA subjects, but English. They move around Mumbai with an unexplainable sense of inadequacy. Low self esteem.
Many succumb to the inferiority complex & withdraw.
If the govt is aiming to create more such students - it may well culminate in a cruel decimation of budding young talent & uncluttered dreams.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, there was a training session for Maharashtra's Judges (JMFC & MM) at judicial academy on the 3 new criminal laws that are set to screw your freedom & dignity.
About 187 Judges were called for it.
A retired Madras HC judge
And, a Retired UP Sessions Judge was called in as speakers.
A training of barely 1 & half day is actually no training at all.
It was reflected in the responses of those who attended.
1. Why ? If you merely wanted to change the nomenclature - why not through an amendment?
2. Why ?? Why change the sequence of sections and numbering - when there's no substance.
3. There's no opportunity to unlearn the old laws as they're going to remain for at least 30-40 years.
4. What happens to the prevailing jurisprudence qua the sections that r in conflict?
Dindori, LS constituency in Maharashtra is an amazing story of @ECISVEEP & @rajivkumarec's questionable conduct AND @PawarSpeaks's remarkable political smarts.
Mr. Pawar had fielded, an ordinary party Karyakarta, a teacher, Mr. Bhagare (also known as 'guruji' being a teacher)
He was facing a sitting Minister of State in Modi's Cabinet & political heavyweight, Bharti Pawar.
BJP also fielded one Babu Sadu Bhagre. A commoner with the same surname as that of NCP (SP) candidate.
ECI gave him 🎺 trumpet as a symbol which resembled NCP(SP)'s symbol.
ECI also put (SIR) at the end of this Candidate's name. (Incidentally, a 5th pass man)
To mislead the voters & cause prejudice to Pawar's candidate who is known as Bhagare Sir (he's a teacher, you see)
Here's a small incident to show how privilege works in India :
The son hasn't enrolled in #Aadhaar .
His College's Administration staff (one of the most prominent in Mumbai) told him :- either you'll have to enroll or forget about sitting for the Std XII Boards exam.
The 17 was made to stand outside the Admin block when he was trying to reason with the In-charge that Aadhaar is not mandatory for attempting Std XII exams.
Mr. Dubey, the all knowing God of Admin was pretty harsh to him.
Dubey: "Kya tum Indian citizen nahi ho"?
"Thumne ab tak #Aadhaar kyun nahi banaya"?
"Kya tum Pakistani ho"?
The 17 kept his cool. (He could have smashed Dubey ji to a pulp w/o consequences).
He : Sir, I don't have #Aadhaar & I'm not planning to get one. If you have any Circular from the Board, please share.
Have I understood it correctly?
On #PMLA SC has said : declaration by Parliament, ipso facto, satisfies the 'test' of compelling State interest.
Does that leave room for judicial scrutiny of a Law as all of them are passed / declared by the Parliament. Often, w/o debate.
More shocking is pulling up directive principles in support of upholding sections that are inversion of justice and due process.
Mind boggling is citation of State's obligation to prevent concentration of wealth in a few hands to justify draconian powers of arrest & detention.
SC completely missed the fact that ED's powers have actually been used by the State to concentrate wealth in a few hands - case in point - Mumbai Airport came to Adani only after ED booked GVK Group under PMLA.
That GVK owners weren't arrested can be attributed to sale to Adani
The least that's expected of a ruling dispensation is that it will not mislead the Parliament.
Mumbai has 5 Benches of NCLT.
Bench 1 & 2 are presided by the same members. Bench 1 in the morning session - from 11 AM to 2 PM & Bench 2 in post lunch - 3 PM to 4.30 PM
First up : fresh matters are taken up as Supplimentary board. Here, at the most, notices are issued. Zero adjudication.
Then, 1 or 2 heavy duty cases are heard where Sr. Counsels make never-ending arguments to end the session on being adjourned to some other day.
Other lawyers are given fresh dates and are expected to be glued to their screens on such adjourned dates for 2-3 hours - only to be given further fresh dates.
The funny (sic) part is - it's been happening for over a year now.