Ingrid H. Kvangraven Profile picture
Jul 31, 2020 6 tweets 4 min read Read on X
#AHE2020 as seen from rural Norway. @SurbhiKesar (@working_india) introducing the panel on perspectives from the Global South on Heterodox Economics with a stellar panel calling in from India, Italy and the US. Image
Prabhat Patnaik opens the plenary, speaking on globalization, inequality and economic crisis. #ahe2020 Image
Now @LuGuangMing is presenting on "Bordering the Surplus Population across the Mediterranean: Imperialism and Unfree Labour in Libya and the Italian Countryside". She explains how immigrant workers can be seen as a reserve army allowing farmers to meet low production costs. Image
She highlights the important of understanding this process through a lens of neo-colonial resource extraction that expands the reserve army of labor of metropolitan capital. #AHE2020
She calls this "border imperialism" - it seeks to prevent a common organization of workers across lines of race, religion and nationality; preventing them from realizing their structural power that they have from their role in production. #AHE2020
Now we have @ymadra speaking on: Whither development after neoliberalism: Corporate nationalism vs. democratic economy.

Interesting theoretical framework presented here. 👇#AHE2020 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ingrid H. Kvangraven

Ingrid H. Kvangraven Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ingridharvold

Oct 19
Here is our commentary on how the 2024 Economics Nobel integrates colonialism into economics, while leaving a colonial worldview intact (with @SurbhiKesar & @devikadutt). To explain how & why they do this, we go back to the colonial origins of economics. epw.in/journal/2024/4…Image
As Econ is increasingly being challenged for not adequately dealing with issues of racialization & imperialism, the "colonial turn" in economics that AJR represent seems to offer a defense. But they don't deal with the fundamental problem: the Eurocentric view of capitalism.
A Eurocentric view is one that assumes the development of capitalism evolved in the global North in a rational manner, based on a range of internal factors, distracting from the violent processes of exploitation & colonial extraction that shaped development & underdevelopment.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 13, 2023
What's wrong with development studies & how can we change it?

It was super interesting & thought-provoking to discuss this with @SaraStevano @Kamnatweets and @IndrajitRoyYork recently in Manchester.

We summarized the discussion on the @devcomms blog 👇
devstud.org.uk/2023/03/07/wha…
After the intro by @pritishbehuria & @GoodfellowTom (linked to above), you can read the interventions summarized in chronological order.

I was up first, focusing my intervention on the problem of lack of South-centered theorisation in development studies
devstud.org.uk/2023/02/28/the…
Next up was @Kamnatweets, calling for a deliberate deconstruction of our projections of 'development', picking apart the 'black box' & reckoning with the range of political causes UK Development Studies programmes serve, intentionally or unintentionally,
devstud.org.uk/2023/02/28/loo…
Read 5 tweets
Nov 10, 2022
Our paper on decolonizing economics teaching is finally out!

@SurbhiKesar & I surveyed 498 economists to evaluate possibilities and challenges associated with efforts to decolonize economics.

As you may imagine, the results are not super encouraging...🧵
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
Building on scholarship by Amin, Quijano, Sanyal, and feminist IPE, we see a radical decolonization agenda as one necessitates unpacking how dominant approaches may hinder the study of systemic processes associated with decolonization, such as structural racism and imperialism.
This entails analyzing and challenging Eurocentrism in economics, but also seeking to foreground theoretical frameworks which might be more useful for studying systemic processes that lead to various form of subordination.
Read 44 tweets
Aug 12, 2022
Economists can learn from anthropologists.

I mean it! And not in a "they provide valuable context for our research" kind of way.

Anthro can help us understand financial processes & structures of oppression. Anthro can help us theorise.

Some resources & anthros to follow👇
Markets of Dispossession by @JElyachar dukeupress.edu/markets-of-dis…

Best Practice: Management Consulting and the Ethics of Financialization in China by @KimberlyZChong
dukeupress.edu/best-practice
Forensics of Capital by @topdogunderdog
degruyter.com/document/doi/1…

Social Collateral: Women and Microfinance in Paraguay’s Smuggling Economy by @CarlySchuster
ucpress.edu/book/978052028…

Uncivil City: Ecology, Equity and the Commons in Delhi by Amita Baviskar
us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/unci…
Read 14 tweets
Aug 11, 2022
How do key arguments in the financialization literature change if they are interrogated from the vantage point of the Global South?

@KaiKodden @nssylla and I tackle this question through a historical study of the financial systems of Senegal & Ghana. 🧵👇
academic.oup.com/cje/advance-ar…
We engage with 2 main camps in the financialisation lit: 1) largely descriptive studies of how financial institutions, actors, motives & practices have expanded in recent decades (e.g. Krippner, Epstein), focusing on quantitative changes.
We call it the 'expansion' view.
2) More qualitative studies of how finance has come to dominate other realms of the economy, which often see the productive marriage between finance and production as in severe crisis, as the golden age of capitalism has come to an end. We call it the 'divorce' view.
Read 23 tweets
Jul 21, 2022
What happens when 7 scholars from different heterodox traditions, including Marxism, Post-Keynesianism & Dependency Theory, get together to work on finance?

It actually did not descend into total chaos 🤯

Check out our research agenda on international financial subordination 😊
We identify how different heterodox & disciplinary traditions bring different strengths to the table for conceptualising how developing economies remain in a subordinate position in the global monetary and financial system, and how this shapes the ways in which finance operates.
We argue that an agenda on international financial subordination (IFS) would benefit from a sustained engagement with heterodox traditions that have been the most explicit and systematic in their analysis of finance in the periphery: Marxist, PK & dependency theory scholarship.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(