My Authors
Read all threads
NEW BLOG: Unit Director & Lords expert Meg Russell analyses the effects of Boris Johnson’s newly announced #peerages list.

The 36 appointments push the chamber's size back over 800, reversing hard work by the @LordSpeaker & restraint under Theresa May.

constitution-unit.com/2020/07/31/bor…
The lack of regulation of the PM's appointments to the Lords remains a huge problem.

He can appoint as many peers as he wants, whenever he wants, & with any party balance.

He could even appoint 1,000 sympathetic peers, as Jacob Rees-Mogg once proposed.

express.co.uk/news/politics/…
The only constraints on the PM's appointments to the Lords are the propriety checks run by the House of Lords Appointments Commission

According to this story in today's @Telegraph, Johnson rejects even those - raising threats of a really retrograde step

telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/…
In terms of size these 36 appointments unravel the hard work of the Lord Speaker's Committee on the Size of the House, which had successfully begun managing the size of the chamber down from its highest point in 2016 towards a target of 600 members.

committees.parliament.uk/committee/369/…
Those broad proposals, which also included a formula to maintain party balance, were also supported by @CommonsPACAC - when chaired by Brexit-supporting Conservative @bernardjenkin

Indeed it went further, wanting rules written into the Cabinet Manual.

committees.parliament.uk/committee/327/…
The new appointments also further unbalance the Lords in favour of the government.

There will be 261 Conservatives and 179 Labour - a lead of 82. In contrast when Labour left office in 2010 its lead over the Conservatives was just 22.

This weakens the Lords' power of scrutiny.
Significant frustrations have been expressed by the @LordSpeaker, the former Conservative Cabinet minister Norman Fowler.

He has even suggested that there should be a moratorium on new appointments.

politicshome.com/thehouse/artic…
So what can be done? More retirements from the Lords are not the answer (as the PM could simply fill it up again).

Parliamentary committees should strongly reiterate their commitment to a smaller, more managed Lords, as should other parliamentarians and party leaders.
But ultimately only legislation can constrain the unfettered and outdated patronage powers of the PM.

Whatever happens, some urgent action is needed. As there is already talk of a further peerage list.

@uclnews

telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/…
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Keep Current with Constitution Unit

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!