I think the "framing" of the report itself does a lot of the work, though. Take these three screenshots:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c905/6c9050a0ac0d13df241c7091dbe803ac77a3b6fe" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e77b/6e77b91826dc94fed7ac5d1fe6293211d7f0628c" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f9d2/1f9d2e7f19f87ae4ff920f3c3262a3e34c245c36" alt="Image"
So with these two points in hand, I think you can do something akin to what the person who did the BBC analysis did, and separate fact from spin.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30c00/30c005f18c5efaa6fd23942b25f200a9c32e41be" alt="Image"
Take as a counterpoint this article from NPR from 2010:
Now, after murdering millions of Muslims and destroying several countries, it is charging China with this confusion.
The unchallenged assumption is that nobody can be less racist than them.