John Laurens was an American soldier and statesman from South Carolina during the American Revolutionary War, best known for his criticism of slavery and his efforts to help recruit slaves to fight for their freedom as U.S. soldiers.
John Laurens: A Man of His Times
George Bourne was a 19th-century American abolitionist and presbyterian pastor, who proclaimed "immediate emancipation" of American slaves in a theological treatise. He refused to serve communion to unrepentant slave holders.
George Bourne: A Man of His Times
Juliette Morgan was a librarian & civil rights activist in Montgomery, Alabama. The great grand daughter of a confederate general, Morgan stood against her family & began pushing for integration after attending an interracial prayer meeting.
Juliette Morgan: A Woman of Her Times
Viola Liuzzo was an American housewife & civil rights activist who traveled from Detroit to Selma in the wake of Bloody Sunday. After participating in the Selma to Montgomery marches, she was murdered by the KKK while helping with logistics.
Viola Liuzzo: A Woman of Her Times
Heather Heyer was an advocate for the disenfranchised, often moved to tears by the world’s injustices. She joined demonstrators protesting a rally of white nationalists in Charlottesville where she gave her life standing for black lives.
Heather Heyer: A Woman of Her Times
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’ve always had misgivings about the way some circles use the phrase “Christian worldview.”
My main concern was that they’d use the phrase to help create a cultural orthodoxy, baptizing partisan platforms as binding on Christian consciences and branding others as heretical.
In a climate of increasing polarization, I believe this phrase “Christian Worldview” has done considerable damage because it suggests a kind of political certainty that doesn’t respect our freedom to faithfully apply the claims of scripture in complex, nuanced, and different ways
I knew the phrase “Christian Worldview” was unhelpful when it became too narrow to include the social engagement of the majority of Black Christians & many minority Christians, & justice minded believers overseas. It seemed to have little resonance with Catholic Social teaching.
Here are some reasons Christians are called to influence society rather than control society.
1. Exiles and Strangers: The Bible describes our current status as “exiles and strangers” in our world. Heb 11:13 This means we persuade others as guests rather than dictate to them.
2. A Kingdom Not of this World: The NT church is not called or equipped to bear the sword. The weapons of our warfare (prayer, preaching, gospel witness and persuasion, sacrificial service) are not the same weapons the world uses to expand its reach (guns, bombs, tanks, etc)
3. A Name Reserved for Covenant Community: Jesus was very careful and deliberate about what he put his name upon. In scripture, Jesus places his name on his people & his church.
Where does he place his name on countries, political parties, platforms, schools, & economic systems?
1) “A man who flatters his neighbor spreads a net for his feet.”Prov. 29:5
Abusive leaders often use flattery to manipulate people into giving them what they want.The difference between flattery & compliments is that a compliment supports people while flattery supports abusers.
2)Flattery is transactional. When an abusive leader flatters someone, they expect that person to flatter them in return or offer compliance in return. When flattery or compliance are not offered, abusive leaders become frustrated treat that person like a malcontent. @wademullen
3) Flattery is manipulative. Flattery is not used to build people up. Instead it’s used to set people up. Flattery is about ingratiating a victim to become dependent on the abuser for their sense of self worth and to accept abuse as normal or right. @wademullen
/1 Many black women (& men) in majority white church spaces are carefully listening to how their fellow church members speak about Jdg Ketanji Brown Jackson
Some questions they may ask themselves.. 1) Do these folks value representation even if it doesn’t fit their partisan box?
Other questions black folks in majority white churches may ask themselves as they watch the confirmation process for Jdg Jackson
2.Will these people stand up for a black woman if/when she is publicly mistreated?
3.What assumptions do they make about black women’s qualifications
4. Are these folks serious about diversity in the church, if they struggle to appreciate it in the world?
5. Are they willing to malign a black woman if/when they disagree with her?
6. Can they empathize with marginalized people, rejoicing with those who rejoice?
On this day in 1965, Alabama police viciously attacked peaceful protestors as they crossed the Edmund Pettus bridge marching for voting rights. The day came to be known as “Bloody Sunday.”
Here are a few important facts that help us better understand Bloody Sunday.
Bloody Sunday Began and Ended in Prayer
Civil Rights marches often began as prayer meetings. March 7, 1965 protesters gathered for prayer at the Brown Chapel AME Church & began walking from that location. After the brutal attack, they would return there to weep, sing, and pray.
Bloody Sunday: A Victory not a Defeat
The brutal attack on Bloody Sunday was meant to deter protestors from marching to Montgomery. However that plan backfired as media coverage of the event caused participation to swell from 600 marchers that first day to 3,200 two days later.