A post from VOAT: @POTUS
Here's what the Dem's may be planning re: delaying the vote count. And why Nan had the continuity of government meeting, saying she'd be #2 in line for the Presidency.
The Dems all of a sudden seem a little too confident in some plan. Here is what may
2. be at play:
The Constitution’s 20th Amendment also requires the president and vice president to end their terms of office on January 20 at noon in the year following the general election. In addition to those basic constitutional requirements, Congress
3. by statute controls when electoral votes are counted at the states and at Congress. The current statute reads that “the electors of President and Vice President of each State shall meet and give their votes on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December
4. next following their appointment at such place in each State as the legislature of such State shall direct.” This year, that day is December 14, 2020. Another part of the election law requires the states to send in their electoral votes to Congress by December 23, 2020.
5. If electoral votes are not received by the fourth Wednesday in December, then the President of the Senate or the Archivist of the United States can use “the most expeditious method available” to get the votes sent to Congress. The electoral votes received by Congress are
6. counted in a joint session at 1 p.m. on January 6. If a presidential or vice presidential candidate does not receive a majority of the electoral votes, the House selects the next president and the Senate selects the next vice president.
Does the Constitution allow for a
7. delayed presidential election?
What all this means is that if there is a snag with all the mail in voting due to Covid-19 that does not indicate a clear winner, the House gets to chose the next president. POTUS's term constitutionally is up on Jan 20. This is why the Dems
8. keep saying that they may have to physically remove POTUS if he refuses to go - curious?
Right now my understanding is that there are enough Republican run states that they could give POTUS the needed electoral votes by the delegates to clear the 270 threshold and send
9. their votes in even if there is a problem with the mail ins. We did not expect to take the Democrat run states that are promoting mail in ballots - their plan is to delay the count to not have a clear winner. There are previous elections that still are not decided
10. because of the mail in system. This is what is being set up. The Dems could care less about what the actual vote is - they are working on something entirely different to steal the election - they are planning to not have the results thereby giving the House the ability
11. to chose the next president. This is why Nancy Pants and company had a meeting about continuity of government - they are planning this move.
POTUS's tweet the other day about a cancelled election was possibly to let us know what they are planning. Please pass this along for
12. discussion. I do not put anything past them at this point and this maneuver would be completely constitutional and there would be nothing to stop them but exposure. So, we need
13. to keep an eye on those Republican run states - if they go to mail in voting it could be an indication they will side with this latest coup attempt.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aumone Maison

Aumone Maison Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AumoneMaison

Dec 24, 2020
1/13 Doubt anyone who should read this will, but here goes-We had @FOXnews on 24/7 every day for years.
Recorded so many great shows to watch when we had time at night.
Then BOOM
-They fired Glenn Beck
-Then the Meghan Kelly fiasco
-Then Brett Baier's show died
-Then they fired
2/13
- Eric Bolling and Bill O'Reilly
-They hired Donna Brazille
-They brought on Anti-Trumper Paul Ryan to run things
-Then Chris Wallace @FoxNewsSunday went anti-Trump like we couldn't believe! (Do you remember the days when we could watch a news show and never know
3/13
the person's political leanings?)
-We finally changed our 24x7 to @OANN & fell in love again with a FAIR AND BALANCED NEWS OUTLET!
-@FoxNews went out of their way to become CNN & we could NOT understand why would you want to follow in the footsteps of a losing news outlet.
Read 13 tweets
Nov 25, 2020
@realDonaldTrump I know you can't respond to me personally, Sir, but right now I need to vent.
I go back and forth from faith that you will get the true votes in your column and then I read something that takes that truth away.
I have never felt like this before but I have never
2. watched my Country dissolve before my eyes.
I have never thought people on the left could be so blind.
I have never thought people on the right could be so traitorous.
Sir, please keep on fighting for your next 4 years, because if you don't win; there is no USA.
You have no
3. idea how many times I pray every single day. You have no idea how many tears I have cried in the last 3 weeks.
You have no idea how much I have found hate in my heart for the left; knowing I should not hate.
I feel like I have lost my Country and hate the left for taking it
Read 7 tweets
Nov 24, 2020
trendingpolitics.com/shocking-study…
I wonder how many journalists & media people will end up in jail. What say you @CNN ?
Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays
2. any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize
3. any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes
Read 4 tweets
Nov 22, 2020
A thread by our old friend Rex-
"Will Trump win the 2020 election?
WRONG QUESTION.
Trump has already won the election.

Correct question : HOW does he subjugate the enemy's will to resist?
Follow-up questions - how does he do it, with the least possible damage
2- to The Republic?
Thoughts.
Everyone is focusing on the PUBLIC drama playing out 24/7, across America.
In particular, the various legal actions being taken by Team Trump and others in different State and Federal courts.
Fair enough. However, the analysis is wrong.
3- It assumes the outcome is in doubt, when it is not.
Readers of my threads already understand my position.
Trump has known about the Democrats vote fraud schemes for YEARS. There are tweets as far back as 2012.
Ergo, he would have known he was target #1 in 2016, 2018 and
Read 21 tweets
Nov 11, 2020
I wish every single person who was involved with this Voter Fraud would take the time to read this!
Are they willing to go to jail for Joe?
52 U.S. Code § 20511.Criminal penalties
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52…
A person, including an election official, who in any election for Federal
2. office—
(1) knowingly and willfully intimidates, threatens, or coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any person for—
(A) registering to vote, or voting, or attempting to register or vote;
(B) urging or aiding any person to register to vote, to vote, or to
3. attempt to register or vote; or
(C) exercising any right under this chapter; or
(2) knowingly and willfully deprives, defrauds, or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process, by
(A) the procurement or submission
Read 6 tweets
Sep 28, 2020
I had a Dr.'s appt this morning. On the way home I was listening to Rush who played an audio clip of AB Stoddard saying she believes the release of @realDonaldTrump tax documents could keep Independents & those on the fence to NOT vote for @POTUS. (cont.)
2. Saying that is no different than if you replace @realDonaldTrump with the only Heart Surgeon in the world who could perform a specific surgery & then replace the voters with a patient who would die if he didn't get the surgery offered by the surgeon. (cont)
3. A week later you find out that the patient died. He died as a result of researching the Dr.'s social media & decided NOT to have the surgery because he disagreed with the Dr.'s social media posts.
Not voting for @POTUS because of posts, taxes, or any other reason (cont)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(