Elliot Haspel Profile picture
Aug 6, 2020 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
One reason this is such an important read is how it illuminates philosophical underpinnings of child care policy we don't often talk about. Michel charts how U.S. child care policy rests on a welfare foundation, and not a feminist one. This matters. (1/4)

prospect.org/health/will-fe…
As she points out, to get to 'universal' child care (child care as a public good), "Congress will probably need to replace the child care block grant, which, though very helpful in the past and given a second life in pandemic relief, is still framed as... (2/4)
... support for low-income families rather than as a universal program." This is a bigger lift than just supercharging subsidy; but in its DNA, subsidy was designed as a means-tested welfare program. Other nations talk abt child care entitlements or rights - very different. (3/4)
So in addition to reframing child care for the public, we need to craft a new public policy framework that simultaneously centers family needs & preferences (inextricable from moms having legit work/care choices!) + children's thriving in a functional, well-resourced system. 4/4

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elliot Haspel

Elliot Haspel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ehaspel

Sep 4, 2023
One of the greatest differences between the U.S. and nations that lead the pack on family outcomes is an understanding that, as the Nordic Council of Ministers says, "the well-being of children is strongly linked to that of their parents."
In the U.S., we often segment out the child from the parents. Think about the way that we focus on 'school readiness' by what the kid can do w/o considering factors like housing stability. We want a playground for the kid w/little consideration for how parents can socialize.
Similarly, until pretty recently, America has had very little to say about how working conditions, schedule predictability, and job quality impact parental well-being. That conversation is much more sophisticated (and has policy teeth) in many peer nations.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 27, 2023
🧵Ok, we need to talk about this. We've reached the point where in a well-intentioned attempt to do ANYTHING about child care, the administration is taking an action that may be actively counterproductive. Let me explain.

nytimes.com/2023/02/27/us/…
First off, I have SO MANY QUESTIONS about how this is going to work. Options include "company child-care centers near construction sites or new plants, paying local child-care providers to add capacity at an affordable cost for workers, directly subsidizing workers’ care costs"
Ok, but you realize we have a MASSIVE child care educator shortage right now, yes? Do any of these companies need to ensure educators get a competitive wage? What happens if their workers just end up on waiting lists? Doesn't feel fully thought out.

nytimes.com/2022/10/13/us/…
Read 13 tweets
Feb 27, 2023
Just like community centers, I strongly believe local government should set these up!

Some do. I went to an "open center" in Helsinki, and it was simple and lovely.

(Indoor options do exist in the U.S., but usually the hours suck or they're expensive)

foreignersinfinland.fi/post/everyone-…
None of this has to be complicated. There are enough public buildings around -- elementary school gyms could easily be used on the weekends -- and local gvm't could partner with volunteer orgs, faith communities etc. to staff them. Toys, coffee machine, you're set.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 12, 2022
🧵I had a fascinating experience today at this Helsinki playground that reinforced for me just how backwards the U.S. gets its family policy.

(And no, this isn't gonna be another 'if only America was Finland' thread) Image
I went with my daughters to attend a free arts & crafts activity at the children's center adjoining the playground (many Finnish playgrounds have these, and there are different staffed activities every day).

A Finnish father was there with his delightful 15-month-old son.
We struck up a conversation and it emerged that he was on his third day of paternity leave. His wife had been taking care of their son before going back to work, and now he had three months of full-time care before the toddler started attending a child care program in January.
Read 10 tweets
Jun 14, 2022
🧵I want to talk about what the school meals cliff means in real terms.

Let's say you're a family of four making $52,000 a year, with one kid in elementary school and one in middle school.

Right now, your kids are getting breakfast and lunches for free during the school year.
When the food waivers expire in 2 weeks, sorry, you're over the limit for free/reduced-price meals.

Your cheapest option now is to just purchase full-price meals.

With prices going up, that means in a typical district you're paying *$1,700* for 2 kids!

wral.com/wake-votes-to-…
That's 3% of your annual income and close to a $150 increase in your monthly food budget!

Of course, this assumes that your district is actually able to operate its school meal program as usual; if it's not, now you're buying more at the grocery store.

usnews.com/news/education…
Read 5 tweets
Jun 13, 2022
"Under a policy of broadly expanded subsidies that limits family payments for ECE to no more than 7% of income among those up to 250% of national median income, we estimate that mothers’ employment would increase by six percentage points while full-time...
nber.org/papers/w30140?…
"...employment would increase by nearly 10 percentage points, with substantially larger increases among lower-income families...

...Despite the increased use of formal care, family expenditures on ECE services would decrease throughout most of the income distribution..."

(10%!)
...For example, families in the bottom three income quintiles would experience expenditure reductions of 76%, 68%, and 55%, respectively. Finally, teacher wages and market prices would increase to attract workers with higher levels of education."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(