Kudos to @nytimes and @SherylNYT for publishing this article on Birx, which rectifies some of the unfair criticism aimed at her in NYT's July 18 article. This one tells the rest of the story: She's been pushing the White House and governors to do more. /1 nyti.ms/30AEgS0
The July 18 article was full of criticisms of Birx, many of them anonymous, that exceeded, and in some cases contradicted, evidence in the public record. Some of that evidence was in the article itself. I described some problems with that article here. /2
1) "Inside the White House, aides refer to Dr. Birx as 'Dr. Doom' for her efforts to temper the president’s positive spin."
2) A State Department adviser says Birx told Pence, "You’re putting a mask on and appearing with a mask." /3
3) The Dem governor of KY says Birx stood up, in the administration's name, to give him cover for issuing a mask order and considering a shutdown of bars.
4) The GOP governor of MS says Birx "prodded him for weeks to institute a statewide mask order; this week he relented." /4
These tweets from NYT reporters indicate that while others were blaming Birx (some of it looks like White House political people trying to cover their own malpractice), she wouldn't tell her side of the story. Now she has folks speaking up for her. /END
If you visit DC this summer, beware: The city manipulates traffic signs and cameras to take your money.
Example: This is Massachusetts Ave. NW, which runs from Maryland into DC. Months ago, the MD side lowered its speed limit. It posted big orange signs to alert drivers. (1/6)
Those alerts are still up in MD, to give drivers notice.
But when DC lowered the limit on its part of the same road, it posted no alerts. Instead — almost simultaneously — it lowered the trigger on its speed camera.
Why? To surprise drivers and hit them with $100 tickets. (2/6)
When you drive a road routinely, you get used to the speed limit. Without an alert, you wouldn't initially notice a new number.
Weeks after DC switched the number, Google Maps still showed the previous limit.
That's why MD waited to enforce its new limit — and DC didn't. (3/6)
Several weeks ago, I learned that @Citibank locks some customers out of their accounts and refuses to release their money even if they show up with ID.
This week, @Citi sent an email explicitly affirming its right to do this "without cause."
If so, I strongly recommend that you find an alternative. Citibank has procedures that will lock you out of all your accounts without consultation — and will bar you from regaining access for 45 days, even if you show up in person with ID. (1/9)
This happened to my son. He went to another US city and tried to use his debit card. Card was declined, account was blocked.
This happens. But what happened next was Kafkaesque: @Citibank refused to accept any method of proving his identity, including showing up in person. (2/9)
His first notice wasn't a text or email alerting him to fraud. It was an email announcing that all his accounts were blocked, immediately, and would automatically close, so he had no access to any funds.
Since he was traveling and was relying on @Citibank, he was screwed. (3/9)
Ted explains how needlessly explicit pledges to appoint based on race (e.g. Biden on KBJ) reinforce the "asterisk" that unfairly haunts promoted women and minorities. bit.ly/3vn9wSy
Ted's alternative model: the NFL rule that teams must interview, not necessarily hire, a minority candidate for head coach.
Biden could do this for court and cabinet jobs, "so whoever he ends up choosing feels less like an affirmative-action hire or a racial quota fulfillment."
"Biden just nominated a woman to lead the Coast Guard. First time ever, a women will lead an armed service. No fanfare. He didn’t say ... 'I’m going to make sure a woman leads our armed forces.' He just did it."
Result: "No one’s talking about whether this woman is qualified."
New ISW report: "Russian General Officers are reportedly instructi[ng] commanders to severely restrict internet access among Russian personnel ... to combat low morale."
The problem: "Ukrainian influence over the information consumed by Russian soldiers." bit.ly/3jeaRWg
"Ukrainian Military Intelligence reported increasing Russian censorship...to combat growing morale problems among Russian troops. Ukraine’s GUR reported that Russian officers are intensifying censorship of their troops and restricting access to the internet due to low morale." /2
"The GUR claimed that Russian commanders complain about increasing Ukrainian influence over the information consumed by Russian soldiers. The GUR claimed to have intercepted an extract from an order ... which blamed low Russian morale on the internet and social media." /3