The panel began with the expected book recs, then took a turn into some much deeper topics.
This thread will include some of the many things the panelists said. I’m copying this over from my handwritten notes, so assume I’ve paraphrased unless I put something in quotes. There’s also a chance that some of these thoughts are attributed to the wrong person.
The panel began with a book rec from each panelist:
@gracikim described Legendborn by @tracydeonn (out in September) as King Arthur with Southern Black girl magic.
@ClaireRousseau said The Unspoken Name by @AKLarkwood is fun epic fantasy that subverts a lot of tropes.
From @gaileyfrey: The Mermaid, the Witch and the Sea by @emteehall is about trauma, colonialism and the cost of violence. (It also has pirates.)
From @redscribe: The City We Became by @nkjemisin is an angry book in a beautiful way.
I’ve read The City We Became (it’s amazing!), and the other three are now on my TBR list. (And I’ve already ordered two of them from my local indie store!)
And @redscribe pointed out that all of these recommended books deal with trauma, grief and politics—including gender, race and class.
And @gracikim noted how Rick Riordan Presents is publishing stories that resonate with elements of different cultures, not just on the surface level, but one level deeper. Not just foods characters eat, but also how they think.
Works like this didn’t exist when she was a kid.
The conversation then turned to magic systems, and how @gaileyfrey’s book, Magic for Liars, doesn’t have one.
@gaileyfrey said that she didn’t design a magic system because to her, magic should be innate, and at least a little out of reach.
And @gaileyfrey said that when she was a kid, she loved a good magic system because she could pretend she had the magic, but as an adult, she wants it to be a bit mysterious. You can’t know whether you have it or not.
And @gracikim said that the idea of magic being accessible to all is powerful, and that if you define the magic too much, it almost takes away the magic.
From @gaileyfrey: part of why magic systems are comforting to some people is because rules and boundaries are comforting to some people. But for others, rules hurt them, so… “Poops to a magic system.”
Thoughts on magic:
@gaileyfrey: tell me rules so I can function, but don’t limit me. I want either rules that matter, or no rules at all.
@gracikim: If the boundaries serve no purpose, the search outside the boundaries is electrifying.
The panel then considered questions from the audience:
Q1: Do you create the magic system first, or the plot, world, etc?
From @gracikim: I started with the character and built the world around her.
From @gaileyfrey: I usually start with character. The magic is based on the character. For example, a reckless character will have big, scary magic.
Q2: How can you write a story with magic in the current times?
@gaileyfrey: abandon the idea that fantasy is neutral and apolitical.
From @gracikim: Once you publish a book, it becomes a public resource. People read things into it based on their own baggage.
From @ClaireRousseau: You don’t want readers who want “neutral” fantasy to be comfortable.
And those are the notes I wanted to share from “Fantasy Today.” I really enjoyed this panel, and I love how the discussion went deeper than just a list of books to read. The discussion about magic systems in particular left me with a lot to think about.
I'm hoping to do threads like this for a number of the panels I attended. I'll be collecting them here: twitter.com/i/events/12922…
Happy reading!
A quick correction: @gaileyfrey 's pronouns are they/them. Sorry for misgendering up above. (And thank you to @coolcurrybooks for catching that.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For those of us who aren’t celebrating Christmas, I would like to share a story:
In a small Jewish community on an outlying planet sits a museum. At its center, a narrow plinth. Upon the plinth, a boxy container, folded from heavy white paper, its edges charred. A wire handle across its top.
The label reads: In Commemoration of the Great Christmas Alliance
There is no further explanation posted, but ask any museum staff member, and they will tell you the tale of the time when Chinese food saved the Jews from boredom and despair, on the occasion of yet another Christmas.
This Rosh Hashanah, my thoughts kept returning to a single story. It’s the story of a soul, newly arrived at the gates of Heaven And while I’m not sure I believe in a literal heaven, with an actual gate where angels stand guard, a story doesn’t have to be factual to be true.
So a woman arrives at the gates of Heaven. She is small of stature, but she stands tall before the imposing gates. A simple black robe hangs from her shoulders, and a lacy white collar adorns her neck. In her eyes, there is a gleam of steely determination.
In most stories, this is when the angels would stop her. They would ask her to prove she deserves a place in Heaven. But in this story, the angels step aside.
The eighth panel I attended at #ConZealand this year wasn’t technically a panel. It was a dialogue between @doctorow and @Ada_Palmer entitled “Corey Doctorow and Ada Palmer Discuss Censorship and Information Control”
I learned a lot from their conversation.
This thread will include some of the things the two of them said. I’m copying this over from my handwritten notes, so assume I’ve paraphrased unless I put something in quotes.
From @Ada_Palmer: Every time there’s new media technology, people worry about the new one and forget to censor older ones. Censorship focuses on the newest saturate media - and on where people get political information from.
This thread will include some of the things the panelists said. I’m copying this over from my handwritten notes, so assume I’ve paraphrased unless I put something in quotes.
The panelists began by listing pet peeves about how justice is handled in science fiction and fantasy:
@AdriJjy: I want more about societal institutions and systemic things rather than an individual. And I hate the bad guy getting redeemed by dying.
This thread will include some of the things the panelists said. I’m copying this over from my handwritten notes, so assume I’ve paraphrased unless I put something in quotes.
First, the panelists introduced themselves. Among other things, each shared which indigenous tribe they are a part of. Because most of these tribal names were unfamiliar to me, I didn’t know how to spell them, so I looked them up afterward on author websites and twitter.