The question is why this document has received virtually no media attention -- as with earlier declassified documents. It is at best misleading by omission and at worse intentionally false in its briefing of a congressional intelligence committee. jonathanturley.org/2020/08/10/new…
...The problem is that there seems a virtual new blackout on the new evidence being declassified. After using tanker loads of ink on the unfounded collusion theories, the media seem unwilling to use a drop of ink on the evidence of misconduct in pursuing that investigation.
The statement that most stands out from the briefing is that the Primary Sub-source “did not cite any significant concerns with the way his reporting was characterized in the dossier to the extent he could identify it.” That statement was known in 2018 to be demonstrably untrue.
