Mason Nystrom Profile picture
Aug 11, 2020 15 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Bitcoin, specifically the mining process gets a lot of flack for its energy usage. However, Bitcoin mining can help alleviate one of the greatest challenges facing renewable energy – the Duck Curve. 🧵 Image
The Duck Curve ELI5

Energy from renewables is inconsistent and peaks at inconvenient times. Solar peaks during the midday and wind in the middle of the night.

But, peak demand occurs in the morning and in the late afternoon which is opposite from renewable energy generation.
Renewables now provide an excessive amount of renewable energy from solar and wind during the middle of the day which screws up the economics of electricity generation because the net energy production (grid load) continues to increase without any outlet.
This results in the “Duck Curve” where there’s too much energy being generated which ends up getting curtailed – wasted – or sold at negative prices.

Conversely, as demand rises at the end of the day, generators scramble to ramp up energy load, typically utilizing fossil fuels.
Texas is the largest producer of renewable energy and has a deregulated energy grid which increases competition and so the Duck Curve – and the fate of renewables – is an even larger dilemma. Image
The Solution

Bitcoin mining provides a mechanism known as demand response:

• Bitcoin mining consumes energy constantly
• Bitcoin mining operation is a flexible load, meaning it is
relatively easy to shut down since it doesn’t require any
sort of continuous operations.
Layer1 is capitalizing on this use case by negotiating with ERCOT – the Texas energy grid regulator – for long term demand response contracts. Essentially, Layer1 agrees to shut down at a moment’s notice while collecting an annual premium based on their expected power demand.
How does this help?

Demand response helps stabilize the energy grid by removing price spikes, leveling energy demand, and realign economic incentives – reduce negative pricing – that allow for the continued growth of renewable energy sources.
Now, Layer1’s strategy comes with the obvious downside that their bitcoin printers – mining facilities – go brrrr less often.

However, in exchange for guaranteed revenues, this may be an effective hedge for miners against bitcoin’s volatility. Image
Bitcoin and The Environment

Bitcoin mining energy usage is dependent on local energy grids, most mining facilities already use renewable energy sources such as thermal, hydro, wind, and solar.
CoinShares estimates a 73% renewables penetration in the bitcoin mining energy mix and that Texas is a prospective region for mining. Image
Still, Bitcoin will only ever be as clean and environmentally friendly as the grid. Period.

If mining utilizes energy from peaker plants that are turned on only when demand reaches certain levels – then it’s not entirely environmentally friendly.
Bitcoin is unique, it will continue to consume energy.

There is no upper limit on the price of bitcoin and therefore no limit on how much energy can be dedicated to mining bitcoin. This is the biology of Bitcoin.
The ever – and altruistically – moving goalpost of environmental servitude ensures that Bitcoin will never be without environmental consequences. The hope is Bitcoin’s benefits will outweigh its flaws.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mason Nystrom

Mason Nystrom Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @masonnystrom

Jul 17
There are a few common crypto business models:
- Exchanges and marketplaces
- Transaction sequencing
- Asset managers

Let's dive into some examples 👇
Exchange Model
Subset 1) marketplace models – fee on transactions
- create a new asset and market (e.g. Polymarket, Perps)
- expand access to emerging asset (Coinbase and BTC)
- convenience fee (wallet swaps)
- SaaS enabled marketplaces – Proof marketplaces

Exchange subset 2): Liquidity servicing - build valuable pool of specialized liquidity and charge acces fee to end app (e.g. hooks) or match-maker fee (e.g. swaps)
- DEXs
- Lending
MEV / Transaction sequencing – own and monetize valuable order flow
- App PFOF (e.g. TG Bots)
- Sequencer model - own sequencer and MEV (e.g. L2)
- SaaS enabled tx sequencing and monitoring - RaaS, RPC providers, security providers, oracles etc.
Read 5 tweets
Jul 6
Lots of people on the timeline questioning token incentives and whether they're net-beneficial or net-negative.

Some thoughts 🧵
When combined with new products, tokens – or the promise of tokens – have proven effective at alleviating the cold start problem.

But, networks that launch with a token from the jump, must find PMF in a shortened window amidst inorganic activity or otherwise these networks are just spending tokens for limited upside.

My friend and fellow investor, @howdai27 calls this the “hot start problem” where the presence of a token limits the window of time a startup has to find PMF and gain enough organic traction such that the startup can retain users/liquidity as token rewards diminish.Image
The hot start problem – launching tokens early and dealing with finding PMF amidst inorganic activity – is favorable to the cold start problem in two scenarios:

1) Startups competing in red ocean markets (markets with a high degree of competition and known demand)
Examples: Second mover defi protocols, Blur vs OpenSea, LRTs, etc.

2) Products and networks with passive-supply side participation
Examples: passive jobs to be done – staking (L1s), providing liquidity, or set-it and forget-it hardware (e.g. DePIN).
masonnystrom.com/p/tokenized-ma…
Read 5 tweets
Apr 26, 2023
Over 2 million compressed NFTs have been minted in just a few weeks.

Enabled by @metaplex's new NFT compression standard (Bubblebum), Compressed NFTs offer greater scale to NFT minting and open up a new array of use cases for Solana NFTs. Image
But what are compressed NFTs?

Normal Solana NFTs have metadata stored in on-chain accounts

Compressed NFTs group the state of many NFTs into a merkle tree and hash the merkle root on-chain with each leaf of the tree (e.g. NFT) verifiable on-chain while the metadata is offchain
Compressed NFTs allow minting NFTs at scale while securing them cryptographically on-chain.

Importantly, compressed NFTs can be redeemed/decompressed in which case the NFT is removed from the offchain merkle tree and then exits on-chain as a normal Metaplex NFT.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 5, 2023
Some thoughts on NFT marketplace defensibility and value capture
nystrom.substack.com/p/defensible-n…
The magic of NFTs as an asset class is that the underlying assets are composable. But, this effortlessly destroys the moat of secondary trading liquidity that marketplaces have relied on to succeed.
NFT marketplaces must find proprietary liquidity that lives on their platforms, that drives users, and is unique.

Fluid secondary liquidity means marketplaces & NFT social networks must compete in the streets of the bazaar where trading occurs and not behind their castle moats.
Read 18 tweets
Mar 27, 2023
Artists have earned over $5m in earnings on Sound Protocol.

Let’s take a brief look at the state of @soundxyz_ Protocol & Marketplace 🎧 🧵
sound.xyz
Sound Protocol by the numbers:
•$10m in NFT volume (4.4m Primary and 5.7m Secondary)
• Minted over 80,000 music
• Over 400 talented artists
• Nearly 13,000 collectors

dune.com/nicoelzer/soun…
Music NFT mints continue to grow 📈

Feb 2023 was Sound’s best month ever in terms of music NFTs minted.

The record month was aided by the launch of Sound’s curator rewards which enabled fans to earn 5% on primary mints generated through their referral links and playlists. Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 28, 2023
Today, the way in which protocols build demand is often dictated by two GTM approaches:
1) Network-driven Protocol GTM
2) Product-led Protocol GTM

Let's examine when each GTM strategy works best.
nystrom.substack.com/p/protocol-gtm…
1) Network-driven protocol GTM focuses on building a protocol with broad distribution and permissionless access, and then evangelizes others to build on top of the network.

Examples: Ethereum, Polygon, Livepeer, Metaplex, Lens, XMTP, Reservoir
This approach often encourages adoption through:
• Permissionless access (e.g. Ethereum)
• Strong BD/sales (e.g. Polygon)
• Integrations and Robust documentation (i.e., XMPT)
• Token standard or contract integrations (e.g., Metaplex)
• Resource marketplaces (e.g.Livepeer)
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(