Learnt a bit about blood pressure measurement last year. But if it’s not on twitter did it really happen?
Cue my second #tweetorial 😎
BP can me measured invasively or non-invasively and there are three common methods: intra-arterial, manual (sphygmomanometry), and automated (oscillometry).
Due to the effects of gravity on the hydrostatic pressure of fluid in a column, the Wheatstone Bridge must be at the same height as the heart to give an accurate reading.
Additionally the device must be ‘zeroed’ to atmospheric pressure to calibrate it and ensure accuracy.
In addition to measuring systolic (pressure during systole - heart contraction) and diastolic (pressure during diastole - cardiac relaxation) pressures, this method can ascertain a true mean arterial pressure (MAP).
When the cuff pressure falls below that of the diastolic the artery stays patent throughout the entire cardiac cycle and the sounds are no longer heard.
MAP can be calculated using the equation above.
Although easy, quick, and non-invasive, this method may lead to inaccurate readings for a number of reasons: inappropriate cuff or stethoscope placement, inaccurate gauge calibration, and clinician hearing for example.
In these situations, consecutive readings should be taken and mean values calculated for best accuracy.
According to Matthieu Halfon and colleagues (bit.ly/3aAC1Bl) three readings is the sweet spot!
So that’s a quick tour of BP measurement. Ultimately there are pros and cons to each method, and even the ‘gold standard’ is prone to inaccuracy. So be aware of the limitations of the method you’re using and, as always, interpret the findings in their clinical context!