Carolina Bolado Profile picture
Aug 17, 2020 7 tweets 1 min read Read on X
So I just had a fun interaction with the Florida Board of Bar Examiners.
Me: Hi, I'd like to file a public records request. To whom should I direct it?
FBBE: We don't have to comply with public records requests.
Me: Can you cite to the statute that exempts you from providing public records?
FBBE: If you send us a request we will reply with the statute and explanation.
Me: OK, so can I have an email address to which I can send this request?
FBBE: We don't normally give out personal email addresses.
Me: I don't mean a personal email address, I mean a general email address.
FBBE: We only accept correspondence by mail or by fax.
I have filed public records requests using email or online forms with various Florida agencies before. This should not be difficult.
An additional note, because I see lots of comments saying the FBBE did this to a reporter -- I did not identify myself as a reporter, and I didn't specify what I was requesting. I just called and asked where I could send a formal public records request.
Anyway, I sent my first fax today in years. Email-to-fax is a marvelous thing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Carolina Bolado

Carolina Bolado Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CarolinaBolado

Dec 22, 2021
Here it is: I talked to a juror in the Kleiman v. Wright trial: law360.com/capitalmarkets…
This juror, who will remain anonymous, told me that all 10 jurors agreed early on that Craig Wright was liable for some of the IP moved from W&K to his own entities.
But they were split 8-2 in Wright's favor with regard to the bitcoins issue. Most did not believe Dave Kleiman was involved in developing or mining bitcoins.
Read 9 tweets
Dec 6, 2021
We have a verdict. Or a hung jury. We've got something at least. Back in the courtroom, waiting for everyone to get here and figure out what's going on.
It's a verdict. Going to bring the jury in in a minute.
Before bringing in the jurors, Judge Bloom is again commending the attorneys who provided "superb representation" to their clients.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 29, 2021
Waiting for a verdict…
We've got a note from the jury. They want the "simple definition of unjust enrichment." That's in regards to questions 17-19 of the verdict form, so if they're going in order maybe they're getting close?
They specifically want the definition of the word "conferred" as it applies to unjust enrichment.
Read 12 tweets
Nov 22, 2021
Good morning! Back in the courthouse for Kleiman v. Wright. We started a little early today and are planning to go late, as the parties try to wrap this up to hand the case to the jury tomorrow. Dr. Ami Klin, Wright's autism expert, is still being cross-examined on the stand.
Klin is saying that Wright is "overly literal." Also apparently Wright's favorite book is the OED.
We're on a 10-minute break, and now the attorneys are fighting over whether the plaintiffs can ask Klin to comment on some of the evidence in this case, namely emails in which Wright refers to Dave Kleiman as his business partner.
Read 31 tweets
Nov 19, 2021
Dr. Ami Klin of the Marcus Autism Center in Georgia is on the stand now in Kleiman v. Wright, discussing his work in the autism field and his extensive evaluation of Craig Wright.
He said individuals with autism who also have high intellect often go undiagnosed, especially someone like Wright, who was in school 40 years ago, when people didn't know much about autism.
Klin said he was approached by Wright’s attorneys to evaluate Wright. He told them he doesn’t do expert witness work very frequently and that his opinion would go where the evidence went and would not just serve the case.
Read 21 tweets
Nov 18, 2021
Back in the courtroom for Kleiman v. Wright. A doctor has been going through Dave Kleiman's medical records, explaining his medical issues. There were a lot. Kleiman had really bad pressure ulcers (aka bed sores) and couldn't sit or lay down for any extended period of time.
There were bacterial infections, hospitalizations. He was on painkillers. The reason this is being presented is that Wright has argued that Kleiman was too sick to have done any meaningful work on bitcoin.
In the records, nurses recorded that he was on the computer a lot and that he didn't elaborate on what he was doing, just said he was doing work. They also recorded that he watched movies on the laptop.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(