Angelo Carusone Profile picture
Aug 19, 2020 5 tweets 1 min read Read on X
1/ Yes, it is good for FB to take the action against QAnon groups. But a few things:

1) It has already metastized. Too late to contain now.

2) FB let this thing grow unchecked.

3) Remember: Other tech companies cracked down way months ago - Roku, Apple, Eventbrite.
2/ Oh and don’t get me started on pandering to right-wing.

They can’t crack down against QAnon alone. Facebook has to pair it with a crackdown on anti-fascist pages. So FB is pro-fascism?

What they shoulda done was crack down on the really far out there anti-vax communities.
3/ This is important too: In the past when Facebook has done this, they put out these numbers of pages affected.

The last time they did a big fake news crack down, they also lumped in police accountability pages. Disproportionately hit those pages.

I fear you’ll see that here.
4/ It took about 30 secs and we already found very obvious QAnon content still being advertised.

Last point: It says nothing about private/closed groups. FB has consistently misled tech reporters with this stuff. They announce these things...and it only applies to public groups
5/ And to clarify: that’s is cuz you can apparently still advertise QAnon content, even with this latest supposed crackdown.

Gee. Wonder why. Well for starters, it would affect republican candidates that have used QAnon hashtags in ads.

Beyond that: it’s cuz it’s windowdressing

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Angelo Carusone

Angelo Carusone Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GoAngelo

Apr 17, 2023
1/ So this might partially help explain the delay: Last evening (4/16), Fox submitted a motion to the court. The motion asked the court to allow Fox to introduce as evidence that Donald Trump and others (Trump was the only one Fox named) made the same claims about others.
2/ A previous ruling said Fox wasn't really allowed to do this and they needed to keep focus on what they did. But, Fox is asking for the court to clarify and also approve this for 2 reasons (and this is kinda amusing)...
3/ First, basically to argue that because Trump was saying it, they had to cover it. I'm not sure they will prevail here. The judge has already said they don't get to use the neutral reportage defense and that's basically what this would be.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 14, 2023
1/ There's something incredible in the background during this Dominion trial that is at least as significant (and possibly even more significant) as the trial itself for Fox News' bottom line.

My goodness is this a doozy...
2/ As the trial is happening, Fox News will be renegotiating or gearing up to renegotiate carriage renewal with 3 cable providers -- Xfinity, Chater and Cox.

It's hard to overstate how significant this and how potentially consequential this is for Fox News' future. Here's why...
3/ The dirty secret is that Fox News is the only commercial tv channel that actually doesn't need a single adl. They could have $0 in ad revenue and they'd still have more than a 35% profit margin.

That's cuz Fox is the 2nd most expensive channel on every cable bill (ESPN is #1)
Read 15 tweets
Mar 31, 2023
1/ Judge issued ruling on the summary judgment motions in the Dominion v Fox News case.

Fox Corp and Fox News' motions for summary judgment to dismiss the case have been denied.

Domion's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

Details to follow...
2/ In its partial ruling in favor of Dominion, the court did determine statements made by Fox were statements of fact and were not statements of opinion.
3/ The court ruled that Fox News is responsible for the claims made about Dominion; but, it left open the question for the jury as to whether Fox Corporation (Fox News' parent company) is responsible.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 7, 2023
1/Some Dems are really gonna throw Fox a life raft just as it’s drowning, huh?

If you’re Dem leader, regardless what you think, recognize you don’t need to go on in this moment.

Better off saying nothing than criticize Fox while confirming you’ll treat them same as always.
2/Recognize that “should Democrats go on Fox” debate is actually 2 distinct questions.

1) Should Democrats go on Fox?
2) Should Democrats go on Fox right now?

I can make strong case for both. But I feel like 2 is obvious. There is no valid reason for going on Fox right now.
3/If a Democrat goes on Fox right now, given all that we have seen, they should be asked and forced to explain why they will go on Fox but won’t go on InfoWars or OAN. The deliberate deceit and extremism is the same. Why give Fox a pass?
Read 4 tweets
Mar 1, 2023
1/ Given all the recent revelations about Fox News' internal machinations from the Dominion filings, I'd like to give a sense of just how delicate this moment is for Fox..

I'll start with advertisers, then talk about cable agreements and close with likely cascading litigation
2/ Advertisers. Fox News is already suffering with advertisers quite a bit. Yea, they have MyPillow and vegetable pill sponsors. But, overall, advertising isn'tas robust as it could be -- especially for prime time.

For ex, Fox is currently Fox News' 4th biggest advertiser. Weird
3/ For the most part though, the really big and beloved brands largely eschew Fox. That said, pharmaceutical companies heavily advertise on Fox and then it's companies like @GM and @LibertyMutual that are largely left funding Fox partisan deceptions.
Read 14 tweets
Dec 3, 2022
1/ There's a thing happening right now to Fox that is quite important and will almost certainly influence the trajectory of Fox News if the trend continues.

For some context, a while back, I posted a tread about Fox News and carriage fees.

2/ The short of it is that Fox News is wildly over priced compared to other channels. So much so, that Fox News could have $0 dollars in advertising revenue and they would still have a 90% profit margin.
3/ Fox Corp plays dirty during negotiations. They treat Fox Sports and Fox News as one in same; leverage Fox Sports to drive up rates for Fox News. They use money from Fox Sports to help offset the advertisers losses they suffer from Fox (they leave a lot of money on table).
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(