Angelo Carusone Profile picture
Aug 19, 2020 5 tweets 1 min read Read on X
1/ Yes, it is good for FB to take the action against QAnon groups. But a few things:

1) It has already metastized. Too late to contain now.

2) FB let this thing grow unchecked.

3) Remember: Other tech companies cracked down way months ago - Roku, Apple, Eventbrite.
2/ Oh and don’t get me started on pandering to right-wing.

They can’t crack down against QAnon alone. Facebook has to pair it with a crackdown on anti-fascist pages. So FB is pro-fascism?

What they shoulda done was crack down on the really far out there anti-vax communities.
3/ This is important too: In the past when Facebook has done this, they put out these numbers of pages affected.

The last time they did a big fake news crack down, they also lumped in police accountability pages. Disproportionately hit those pages.

I fear you’ll see that here.
4/ It took about 30 secs and we already found very obvious QAnon content still being advertised.

Last point: It says nothing about private/closed groups. FB has consistently misled tech reporters with this stuff. They announce these things...and it only applies to public groups
5/ And to clarify: that’s is cuz you can apparently still advertise QAnon content, even with this latest supposed crackdown.

Gee. Wonder why. Well for starters, it would affect republican candidates that have used QAnon hashtags in ads.

Beyond that: it’s cuz it’s windowdressing

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Angelo Carusone

Angelo Carusone Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GoAngelo

Oct 31
1/ The right-wing noise machine has a disorienting effect.

Flooding the zone with lies, hate, conspiracies and intimidation. It distorts the conversation, tilts media narrative toward their nonsense, fosters fear and anxiety.

But recognize: this moment unlike any in decades…
2/ I am not sugar coating things. But, I also want to share some major considerations that many aren’t aware of. Considerations as to why this moment is so very unique.
3/ No 1 - recognize that this is the first presidential election in nearly 30 years where Rush Limbaugh is not the single largest get out the vote operation in the country.

The absence of Limbaugh is actually so much bigger than Limbaugh alone though.
Read 17 tweets
Jul 30
1/ I want to explain a bit about what this means. Project 2025 has 4 Pilars: Policy, Personnel, Training and Playbook.

Project 2025 is saying they will stop Policy work. This isn't very significant for 2 major reasons...
2/ Project 2025 shutting down policy work isn't significant because: a) the bulk of the policy work is already done. The 900 page policy book is already written; and, b) the other 3 Project 2025 pilars remain in place -- especially the Playbook pilar.
3/ Project 2025 still plans on doing personnel work and still plans on doing the training work. Essentially, Project 2025 will still be the foundation of staffing a Trump admin should he get back into office.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 17, 2023
1/ So this might partially help explain the delay: Last evening (4/16), Fox submitted a motion to the court. The motion asked the court to allow Fox to introduce as evidence that Donald Trump and others (Trump was the only one Fox named) made the same claims about others.
2/ A previous ruling said Fox wasn't really allowed to do this and they needed to keep focus on what they did. But, Fox is asking for the court to clarify and also approve this for 2 reasons (and this is kinda amusing)...
3/ First, basically to argue that because Trump was saying it, they had to cover it. I'm not sure they will prevail here. The judge has already said they don't get to use the neutral reportage defense and that's basically what this would be.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 14, 2023
1/ There's something incredible in the background during this Dominion trial that is at least as significant (and possibly even more significant) as the trial itself for Fox News' bottom line.

My goodness is this a doozy...
2/ As the trial is happening, Fox News will be renegotiating or gearing up to renegotiate carriage renewal with 3 cable providers -- Xfinity, Chater and Cox.

It's hard to overstate how significant this and how potentially consequential this is for Fox News' future. Here's why...
3/ The dirty secret is that Fox News is the only commercial tv channel that actually doesn't need a single adl. They could have $0 in ad revenue and they'd still have more than a 35% profit margin.

That's cuz Fox is the 2nd most expensive channel on every cable bill (ESPN is #1)
Read 15 tweets
Mar 31, 2023
1/ Judge issued ruling on the summary judgment motions in the Dominion v Fox News case.

Fox Corp and Fox News' motions for summary judgment to dismiss the case have been denied.

Domion's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

Details to follow...
2/ In its partial ruling in favor of Dominion, the court did determine statements made by Fox were statements of fact and were not statements of opinion.
3/ The court ruled that Fox News is responsible for the claims made about Dominion; but, it left open the question for the jury as to whether Fox Corporation (Fox News' parent company) is responsible.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 7, 2023
1/Some Dems are really gonna throw Fox a life raft just as it’s drowning, huh?

If you’re Dem leader, regardless what you think, recognize you don’t need to go on in this moment.

Better off saying nothing than criticize Fox while confirming you’ll treat them same as always.
2/Recognize that “should Democrats go on Fox” debate is actually 2 distinct questions.

1) Should Democrats go on Fox?
2) Should Democrats go on Fox right now?

I can make strong case for both. But I feel like 2 is obvious. There is no valid reason for going on Fox right now.
3/If a Democrat goes on Fox right now, given all that we have seen, they should be asked and forced to explain why they will go on Fox but won’t go on InfoWars or OAN. The deliberate deceit and extremism is the same. Why give Fox a pass?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(